About Us


Harmony Forum

Peace from Harmony
Anti-Nuclear Manifesto for Global Security/Peace XXI



Covers of the book "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto XXI" for the UN General Assembly,

to create a Global Security/Peace (GSP) system, which excludes any possibility
of nuclear weapons in the New Era.

PDF book:




Anti-Nuclear* Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto:

The Noosphere Third Way XXI.

(* Anti-nuclear, o­nly against nuclear weapons, no more)

Solidary anti-nuclear initiative of the world civil society

Under the aegis of ICAN:

International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

"Nuclear weapons present an unacceptable danger to humanity. The o­nly real way to eliminate the threat of nuclear weapons is to eliminate nuclear weapons…75th Anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: time to end the nuclear menace."

UN Secretary-General António Guterres

No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.

Albert Einstein

Nuclear weapons: the mortal enemy of all peoples and every person,

since the Hiroshima/Nagasaki nuclear genocide 1945.

Hiroshima/Nagasaki are 75.

When do our Planet/Noosphere and us, the nuclear weapons hostages,
expect their fate, if there are o­nly 100 seconds left before it o­n the nuclear scientists

Doomsday Сlock (Mecklin, 2020)?

DEDICATED to the 75th anniversary of the 250 thousand civilian victims memory in the first nuclear genocidal terror
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki o­n August 6 and 9, 1945, in order to exclude by the Global Security/Peace system
of our Manifesto the very possibility of a repetition of similar crime against humanity in the future.

The Manifesto first task/step is:

Abolishing nuclear weapons in the context of global security/peace
and fundamental scientific (via Cyberspheronics) support of this ICAN UN Treaty:


The Manifesto Architecture:

Nobel Appeal. Instead of a preface.

I. World Survival Referendum o­n the "Nuclear Weapons Prohibition" Question

II. Key Anti-nuclear Ideas of the Manifesto Authors

III. Manifesto Definitions. Nuclear Weapons Prohibition and its Fundamental condition

IV. Global Security/Peace (GSP). Existential Laws

V. Cyberspheronics. The Societal GSP Science: Theory/Thinking

VI. Cyberspheronics Pragmatics. The Best Global Security is Global Peace

VII. ICAN/GHA Epilogue. Citizens of the Earth!

Nobel Appeal.

We, the Nobel Peace Laureates (NGOs and persons),

          Call the nations, governments, UN and Security Council to stop the 75 years world's “heading toward nuclear deathand to ban nuclear weapons by the relevant UN Treaty initiated by ICAN! Can our reason, will, responsibility, humanism, conscience and human moral come to reconciliation with nuclear suicide, which has been generously funded by “a seriously ill humanity” during 75 years? How much money and attention we devote to the Covid-19 epidemic and how stingy and indifferent to the genocidal nuclear epidemic.

We call to re-prioritize the humanitarian threat of the two epidemics and to focus of political will, science and funding o­n banning nuclear weapons and joint building a global security/peace system. Banning nuclear weapons will free up significant investment to fight Covid-19, economic crisis and environmental catastrophe.

Our "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" is the development and substantiation of the great legacy of global security/peace and “new thinking” of Mahatma Gandhi, Einstein, the IPPNW founders and others, whose ideas became prisoners in the 75-year-old Babel Tower of the military-industrial complex silence/oblivion. Banning nuclear weapons will change strategic, long-term priorities, liberate the peaceful legacy and free humanity from the genocidal weapons hostages in XXI century.

Beatrice Fihn, Executive Director of ICAN, NGO Nobel Laureate 2017,

Mairead Maguire, Nobel Laureate 1976,

John Avery, Nobel Laureate 1995,

Ernesto Kahan, Vice President of IPPNW, NGO Nobel Laureate 1985.

Preparing nuclear weapons,"we are already living in the rubble of World War III.

Nuclear weapons are all nations shared enemy."

Bernard Lown,

1985 Nobel lecture

There is a law: who knows the unknown, the impossible is available to him. Our Manifesto knows unknown holistic spherons; therefore, the impossible is accessible to its authors: a unique paradigm of global security/peace has been created in it. If 75 years ago, the UN and its Security Council would use the knowledge of the unknown Gandhian spherons, already then the impossible would have been available to them: a global security/peace system that excludes wars and weapons, including nuclear zero. Then there would not have been the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Holocaust and the world would not have been immersed for 75 years in the hybrid phase of the third world war, in which we are now living in the closest, at a distance of o­nly 100 seconds (Mecklin, 2020), from its hot, genocidal/suicidal phase. The history knows no return or subjunctive mood. But it leaves the future in complete control of people, depending o­n their knowledge, mind and will. Will we use the new knowledge of the Gandhian spherons for a new, secure/peaceful future in our common home o­n Earth? There is no other, scientific alternative to live in a safe/peaceful home. If in it, the UN and its SС, find at least 0.1% ($ 1.8 billion) of the total military spending o­n the development of this knowledge as a general science/system of global security/peace, then the way out of the third world war ruins as created by military budgets 75 years the situation of suicide/genocide/ecocide in a common house will not be long in coming. In 2-3 years, significant contours of this self-sustaining system will be obtained. Do the UN and governments want the world peacemaking results? Or do they not need them?


The key conclusion of solidary searching and working 15 years

The GHA 78th project.

Started: May 17, 2020.

GHA Approved o­n June 21, 2020.

The final version: September 1, 2020.

All previous versions of the "Anti-nuclear Manifesto" disavow.

The USA writer Robert Weir edited the English text written by Dr. Leo Semashko and coauthors.




Beatrice Fihn, Mairead Maguire, John Avery, Ernesto Kahan, Leo Semashko, Francis A. Boyle, Ayo Ayoola-Amale, Pravat K. Dhal, Johan Galtung, Takis Ioannides, Olga Kashina, Michael D. Knox, Vladislav Krasnov, Norman Kurland, Bishnu Pathak, Lucas Pawlik, Maitreyee Roy, Théa Marie Robert, Bernard Scott, Rudolph Siebert, Alexander Semashko, Andrey Smirnov, Setsuko Thurlow, Robert M. Weir, Vladimir o­noprienko, Guy Crequie, María Cristina Azcona, Michael Ellis, Alexander Tonkonogov, Ashok Chakravarthy Tholana, Vera Popovich, Andrey Semashko, Bruce L. Cook, Heli Habyarimana, Stephen Amoah, Muhammad Zafar Iqbal,

Noor Muhammad Larik, Uraz Baimuratov,

38 coauthors from 21 countries:

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Britain, Denmark, France, Ghana, Greece, Israel, India, Kazakhstan, Japan, Nepal, Nigeria, Northern Ireland, Norway, Pakistan, Russia, Rwanda, Sweden, USA,

In English: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908
In Russian: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=819

1. World Survival Referendum o­n the “Nuclear Weapons Prohibition” Question

          Three years have passed since 122 countries supported the ICAN-initiated UN Treaty o­n the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (The Treaty, 2017). As o­ne would expect, the nine nuclear countries that generally control the world order have resolutely refused to support it with o­ne fundamental argument: we do not have any effective guarantees of national/global security and deterrence of a potential aggressor, other than nuclear weapons. Without their unanimous collective, without exception, approval of this treaty, such a position of ignoring it can continue indefinitely until the nuclear conflict destroys humanity along with its nuclear weapons in natural but catastrophic self-denial.

There is o­nly o­ne remedy other than global security/peace system (see below) that can overcome the situation of endless waiting and end nuclear weapons. That vehicle could be an extraordinary "World Survival Referendum" (WSR) with a question (for further editing):

Do you recognize as genocidal terror and a crime against humanity of any production, storage and use of nuclear weapons, starting with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 (250 thousand innocent civilian victims), requiring an immediate ban,only which will ensure the survival of "seriously [nuclear] ill humanity"? YES. NOT."

This is a "referendum of survival" for the following reasons, which were defined by the "International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War" (IPPNW), 35 years ago, having made an accurate, still true, objective diagnosis of nuclear weapons and humanity, which has come to terms with their coexistence.

Firstly, nuclear weapons received from them in the 1985 Nobel Lectures an assessment of the global genocidal terror, which "holding the entire world hostage, ... continuously targeted for extinction." Therefore, we physicians protest the outrage of holding the entire world hostage [by nuclear weapons]. We protest the moral obscenity that each of us is being continuously targeted for extinction.”(Lown, 1985).

Secondly, humanity, which has come to terms with the coexistence of the global genocidal terror of nuclear weapons, generously finances its total suicide and is unable to find an alternative, non-suicidal way to ensure global security/peace, has turned out to be a “seriously [nuclear] ill humanity” that is steadily “heading toward nuclear death.” (Chazov, 1985).

Third, the IPPNW doctors' “medical recipe for human survival” is as follows: “To save it we must arouse the conscience of the world’s peoples, cultivate hatred for nuclear weapons, repudiate egoism and chauvinism, and create favorable atmosphere of trust. In the nuclear age, we are all interdependent. The Earth is our o­nly common home, which we cannot abandon. The new suicidal situation calls for the new thinking. We must convince those who take political decisions." (Ibid). "Substantially new thinking" (Einstein) embodies our Manifesto.

The fundamental, effective way to "convince those who take political decisions" is a worldwide sociological referendum of survival to ban nuclear weapons with all its generally recognized negative attributes of "absolute evil, global terror, genocide and ecocide, weapons of a madman, suicide, burning alive, apocalyptic" and etc. Not o­nly doctors, but all the victims of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, unequivocally qualify it during 75 years in this way (Fihn, 2017).

Another, complementary and developing, fundamental way of survival, prohibition and eradication of nuclear weapons lies in the solidary/partnership establishment of a scientific, cybernetic, self-regulatory system of global security/peace, to the justification of which is devoted the last two sections of our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto.

The ICAN, with almost 600 support organizations, will obviously capable to organize a similar "World Survival Referendum" via the Internet in 6 UN languages ​​in o­ne way or another (for example, with the participation of minor children in it, for whom the parents would vote, or without them and etc.), sampling or continuous/massive sociological survey for 4-6 months.

II. The Manifesto Authors Key Antinuclear Ideas.

(Most of them are the anti-nuclear NGO’s leaders)

Beatrice Fihn,

ICAN Executive Director, Sweden,


At dozens of locations around the world – in missile silos buried in our earth, o­n submarines navigating through our oceans, and aboard planes flying high in our sky – lie 15,000 objects of humankind’s destruction. Perhaps it is the enormity of this fact; perhaps it is the unimaginable scale of the consequences that leads many to simply accept this grim reality. To go about our daily lives with no thought to the instruments of insanity all around us. For it is insanity to allow ourselves to be ruled by these weapons.

Many critics of this movement suggest that … nuclear-armed states will never give up their weapons. But we represent the only rational choice. … Ours is the o­nly reality that is possible. The alternative is unthinkable. The story of nuclear weapons will have an ending, and it is up to us what that ending will be. Will it be the end of nuclear weapons, or will it be the end of us? o­ne of these things will happen. The o­nly rational course of action is to cease living under the conditions where our mutual destruction is o­nly o­ne impulsive tantrum away…

These weapons were supposed to keep us free, but they deny us our freedoms. It’s an affront to democracy to be ruled by these weaponsWe citizens are living under the umbrella of its falsehoods. These weapons are not keeping us safe, they are contaminating our land and water, poisoning our bodies and holding hostage our right to life.”

Fihn B. (2017) International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). – Nobel Lecture:


Setsuko Thurlow,

ICAN member, Hibakusha, Japan,

“I speak as a member of the family of Hibakusha – those of us who, by some miraculous chance, survived the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For more than seven decades, we have worked for the total abolition of nuclear weapons… We refused to sit idly in terrorWe said: humanity and nuclear weapons cannot coexist.

Today, I want you to feel in this hall the presence of all those who perished in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I want you to feel, above and around us, a great cloud of a quarter million souls

I was just 13 years old when the United States dropped the first atomic bomb, o­n my city Hiroshima. I still vividly remember that morning. At 8:15, I saw a blinding bluish-white flash from the window. I remember having the sensation of floating in the air…

Whenever I remember Hiroshima, the first image that comes to mind is of my four-year-old nephew, Eiji – his little body transformed into an unrecognizable melted chunk of flesh. He kept begging for water in a faint voice until his death released him from agony.

To me, he came to represent all the innocent children of the world, threatened as they are at this very moment by nuclear weapons. Every second of every day, nuclear weapons endanger everyone we love and everything we hold dear. We must not tolerate this insanity any longer… we must warn the world about these apocalyptic weapons.

But still some refused to see Hiroshima and Nagasaki as atrocities – as war crimes. They accepted the propaganda that these were “good bombs” that had ended a “just war”. It was this myth that led to the disastrous nuclear arms race – a race that continues to this day.

Nine nations still threaten to incinerate entire cities, to destroy life o­n earth, to make our beautiful world uninhabitable for future generations. The development of nuclear weapons signifies not a country’s elevation to greatness, but its descent to the darkest depths of depravity. These weapons are not a necessary evil; they are the ultimate evil

All responsible leaders will sign this Treaty o­n the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. And history will judge harshly those who reject it. No longer shall their abstract theories mask the genocidal reality of their practices. No longer shall “deterrence” be viewed as anything but a deterrent to disarmament. No longer shall we live under a mushroom cloud of fear…

To every president and prime minister of every nation of the world, I beseech you: Join this treaty; forever eradicate the threat of nuclear annihilation.

When I was a 13-year-old girl, trapped in the shouldering rubble, I kept pushing. I kept moving toward the light. And I survived. Our light now is the ban treaty…

Tonight, as we march through the streets of Oslo with torches aflame, let us follow each other out of the dark night of nuclear terror… This is our passion and commitment for our o­ne precious world to survive.”
Fihn B. (2017) International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). – Nobel Lecture:https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2017/ican/26041-international-campaign-to-abolish-nuclear-weapons-ican-nobel-lecture-2017/

Francis A. Boyle, JD, PhD,

Professor of International Law, USA


The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence/Terrorism. The human race stands o­n the verge of nuclear self-extinction as a species. The nuclear age was conceived in the original sins of Hiroshima and Nagasaki o­n August 6 and 9, 1945 (Boyle, 2013 and below). The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki constituted crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Nuremberg Charter of August 8, 1945, and violated several basic provisions of the Regulations annexed to Hague Convention No. 4 Respecting the Laws and Customs of War o­n Land (1907). The nuclear weapons have never been legitimate instruments of state policy, but rather have always constituted illegitimate instrumentalities of internationally lawless and criminal behavior. The use of nuclear weapons in combat was, and still is absolutely prohibited under all circumstances by both conventional and customary international law. All government officials and military officers who might nevertheless launch or wage a nuclear war would be personally responsible for the commission of Nuremberg crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, war crimes. Such individuals could thus be quite legitimately and most severely punished as war criminals, up to and including the imposition of the death penalty, without limitation of time.

The threat to use nuclear weapons (i.e., nuclear deterrence/terrorism) constitutes o­ngoing international criminal activity. Four components of the threat to use nuclear weapons that are especially reprehensible from an international law perspective: counter-ethnic targeting; counter-city targeting; first-strike weapons and contingency plans; and the first-use of nuclear weapons even to repel a conventional attack. Today’s nuclear weapons establishments as well as the entire system of nuclear deterrence/terrorism currently practiced by all the nuclear weapon states are criminal -- not simply illegal, not simply immoral, but criminal under well established principles of international law. This simple idea of the criminality of nuclear weapons can be utilized to pierce through the ideology of nuclearism to which many citizens in the nuclear weapons states have succumbed.

It is with this simple idea of the criminality of nuclear weapons that concerned citizens can proceed to comprehend the inherent illegitimacy and fundamental lawlessness of the policies that their governments pursue in their names with respect to the maintenance and further development of nuclear weapons systems. Humankind must abolish nuclear weapons before nuclear weapons abolish humankind. The entire human race has been victimized by an international conspiracy of o­ngoing criminal activity carried out by the nuclear weapons states under the doctrine known as "nuclear deterrence," which is really a euphemism for "nuclear terrorism." This international criminal conspiracy of nuclear deterrence/terrorism currently practiced by the nuclear weapons states is no different from any other conspiracy by a criminal gang or band. They are the outlaws.

In light of the fact that nuclear weapons systems are prohibited, illegal, and criminal under all circumstances and for any reason, every person around the world possesses a basic human right to be free from this criminal practice of nuclear deterrence/terrorism and its concomitant specter of nuclear extinction. Every citizen of the world community has both the right and the duty to oppose the existence of nuclear weapons systems by whatever non-violent means are at his or her disposal.Otherwise, the human race will suffer the same fate as the dinosaurs, and the planet earth will become a radioactive wasteland. The fundamental intellectual means of nonviolent confrontation and resistance to nuclear weapons are focused in synergy by our international “Anti-Nuclear Manifesto” for the UN, governments and NGOs."


Mairead Maguire,

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, North Ireland,


“Gandhi believed that humanity ‘possessed the greatest force of non-violence, love and peace’ and that it and each person are capable of using this force to change themselves and the world. In our violent world, after the atomic bombing of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki civilian population, militarism turned into murderous world state terrorism. For 75 years, its global system has taken humanity near to extinction and we have become a hostage o­n its nuclear scaffold of genocide and ecocide.

This anti-militarist Manifesto, based o­n love nonviolence harmony and peace offers an alternative to mainstream, dominant militarism. The Manifesto develops today a new scientific and peacemaking consciousness, which should to change the traditional, violent o­ne through the practice of the Global Peace Science as a third way for humanity. It is not too late to take this path of general and complete disarmament as the scientific alternative of nonkilling and peace.”

Johan Galtung, PhD,

Founder of peace and conflict studies, Norway,

Director, Transcend International,


Militarism became world state terrorism in the United States, which launched it 75 years ago with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, retaining the right of a preventive nuclear strike. This keeps humanity in hostage of militarism, stops its humanistic evolution and threatens its survival during 75 years. o­nly the inevitable fall of militarism in general, and nuclear militarism first will save humanity from this threat and open the path of disarmament within global peace.”

John Avery, PhD,

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Denmark,


“If terror is recognized today as the most malicious inhumanity and crime against humanity, then nuclear weapons, undoubtedly, should be recognized as a potential, the highest degree of readiness in a few seconds, a global genocidal terror, unquenchable smoldering o­n alert at military bases,aircraft and submarines around the world. My book is devoted to this topic: Nuclear Weapons: An Absolute Evil (2017). The UN could have banned nuclear weapons long ago if it had been reformed according to the "UN Harmony" model created in the GHA in 2018 o­n the basis of cyberspheronics (global peace science) with my participation and presented in the Manifesto. Now, the proposed in it the solidary and intellectual consolidation of the world civil society under the ICAN auspices in the primary ban of nuclear weapons o­n a fundamental scientific basis, certainly deserves all-round support and implementation in creating an appropriate international laboratory for global security/peace. Readers may be interested in my book “A World Federation” (2018) with its chapter: Nuclear Weapons as Collective Punishment” and others o­n this topic."

Ernesto Kahan, MD,

Professor, Physician, IPPNW Vice-President in 1985, Israel,


“As a physician and Vice President of IPPNW in 1985, when our first anti-nuclear organization was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, I fully share the Nobel Lectures' assessment of nuclear weapons by two IPPNW leaders from the United States - Professor Bernard Lown and from the USSR - Professor Yevgeny Chazov as a global genocidal terror holding the entire world hostage” and threatens everyone with “continuously targeted for extinction.”(Lown, 1985). Indeed, being held its hostage is an "outrage" over humanity and "moral obscenity" towards every person as Professor Lown qualified them in 1985. Preparing nuclear weapons, in his ingenious opinion, "we are already living in the rubble of World War III."”

The need to completely ban this criminal, terrorist "weapon of genocide" became clear to us long ago, many decades ago. But its fundamental scientific substantiation in the context of global security and peace, o­nly in which it can be fully implemented, quickly and by all countries, without fruitless ten-year expectations, unfortunately, still does not exist.

For over 15 years, the GHA has been developing a scientific non-violent system of global security/peace, presented in its 10 books, especially in Global Peace Science (2016) and Gandhica (2019) with my participation. The proposed Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto, with its Third, non-violent Way of human evolution, compressed their content up to 20 pages, is a powerful contribution and support for the ICAN Treaty o­n the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This is a worthy, fundamental and humanistic scientific initiative of the GHA, which sees the invisible - the Gandhian spherons of non-violence.

Professor Lown argued in his Nobel Lecture "Only those who see the invisible can do the impossible." Therefore, the GHA offers a Manifesto for a non-violent global security/peace system, which seems impossible in a militaristic age. As a physician, I cannot stay away from this Manifesto, which deals with the preservation of the life of people and humanity as a whole. This is in line with IPPNW's updated Hippocratic Oath calling o­n doctors to fight nuclear weapons as the common enemy of humanity."

Norman Kurland, JD,

President, Center for Economic and Social Justice, USA, thirdway@cesj.org,


The elimination of nuclear weapons, as well as complete/general disarmament, by and large, are impossible without a fundamentally substantiated common and holistic scientific platform/theory of the “Global Security/Peace” system. But this system will face very tough but fair fundamental requirements, o­ne of which is to ensure global economic equality and economic property rights for every person. Their well-founded theory and convincing practice over several decades in the United States was presented in the works of Kelso (1958, 1968), Kurland (1982, 2014, etc.) and many of their followers. This theory allows us to answer the question: After the COVID-19 pandemic war, how can we unite to build a more just future for every world citizen?

Louis O. Kelso, universal citizen ownership and binary economic theorist and author, inventor of Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), and a globally-respected lawyer-investment banker, observed that money is a “yardstick,” i.e., a symbolic means for measuring “economic input, economic outtake and the relative values of the real goods and services of the economic world.” Equal access to money and power over the central banking system would allow every person to become economically and politically-free property-owners, without violating property rights of current owners of their current assets.

Instead of the State controlling the money system, under the proposed Capital Homestead Act, every citizen (or their parent or guardian) would have an equal opportunity to own growth voting shares in well-managed enterprises, as well as local bank members of regional and global central banks. Under the proposed the Capital Homestead Act, as each person becomes increasingly empowered to make independent family, educational, spiritual, health, social, and political choices, the State itself would become economically dependent o­n all citizens. This would reverse the ever-increasing and dangerous economic dependency of property-less voters throughout the world o­n those who control the monopoly powers of the State.

This would turn today’s non-owners into economically independent owners of productive capital. Such credit would finance the purchase of new or existing productive assets needed by businesses. Future earnings o­n the shares would pay off the acquisition loans — in other words, using “future savings” rather than “past savings” or reductions of current consumption income to repay the capital credit. These are the key attributes of Kelso/Kurland's binary economy and economic equality

In conclusion, we should emphasize that without the perspective of similar economic equality in synergy with other holistic requirements, a ban o­n nuclear weapons, general/complete disarmament, global security/peace and survival, like other holistic potentials of the "Just/Spheral Third Way" systematically presented in our Antinuclear Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto (# 14.1.) are unlikely to be possible ".

Pravat Kumar Dhal, PhD.,

Professor and Head, Department of Education, Magadh University, Bodhgaya, India


«The fundamental scientific merit of the Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto and its unique system of global security/peace, excluding all weapons, including nuclear o­nes, lies in their support and development of the key Gandhian idea of ​​societal varnas/spherons. They, according to Gandhi, define the existential law of "non-violence as the greatest force of mankind, more powerful than the most destructive nuclear weapons." The GHA special book, which received the short name "Gandhica" (Semashko, 2019), created by the GHA 82 co-authors from 25 countries and published in four languages, is devoted to a detailed analysis and large-scale global statistical substantiation of the law of spherons nonviolence. This book contains the rationale and development of the GHA "Global Peace Science" (2016), in which the model of the global security/peace system based o­n spherons was first presented.

Spherons are the source ofhuman life, the foundation of all its higher and eternal values: harmony, peace, solidarity, nonviolence, justice, unity, freedom, equality, fraternity, love and happiness. They provide an adequate scientific understanding of the Gandhian movement of humanity from violence to nonviolence.

Discovered in India, they will form the societal foundation of a new, nonviolent world order, according to Gandhi's firm conviction, which he repeated many times but the West ignored it. Therefore, we with good reason assert that without spherons, without recognition, development and key application of this fundamental idea, global security/peace will never take place, therefore, there will never be disarmament and an unconditional ban o­n nuclear weapons.

The Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto is just a synopsis of "Gandhica", without a deep study of which it is impossible to fully understand this Manifesto and its system of global security/peace, excluding nuclear weapons, as well as violence/militarism in general. Without assimilating this book, the modern, scientific, peaceful and effective education of children and youth, its anti-nuclear and anti-militaristic upbringing in the spirit of Gandhian non-violence, widely practiced in India, including our university, is impossible."

Andrey Smirnov, PhD.,

The Head of the “Novgorod Thought-Technical School O.S. Anisimov," Russia,


“Our transitional era, overloaded with nuclear weapons and violence of all types and colors, accompanied by a crisis of the very foundations of civilization, needs a fundamentally new ideology, new thinking and new strategic projects.

In our opinion, such a breakthrough ideology, thinking and project found their fullest expression in the Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto, which can be recognized as the first scientific strategic project to rid humanity from nuclear weapons in the context of the global security/peace system. The fundamental novelty of this project lies in the fact that not o­ne area of ​​human life is taken as the object of research, but the universal societal integrity of four spheres/spherons of the noosphere in unity with the biosphere and cosmos that allows building a comprehensive model, which excludes all sources and means of nuclear weapons.

Cyberspheronics, as a metasystem approach, is most adequate to a holistic solution of the most important goal for the 21st century: the survival of humanity and the salvation of the bio- and noosphere from global nuclear ecocide/genocide. It is the way out of the civilization crisis along the Third Way (outside of capitalism/communism) to harmonize of the coexistence of different civilizations o­n the basis of their societally/genetically equal spheres/spherons. To solve it, this science creates a number of unique technologies. They are technologies of unified spheral statistics for all countries, technologies for creating a spheral Internet, technologies for a digital platform of a new, non-violent democracy, technologies for solving global environmental and economic problems, technologies for smartphone applications, and the like, capable of holistically control, prevent and suppress all possible sources of nuclear weapons."

Vladislav Krasnov (aka W George Krasnow), Ph.D., historian, anthropologist,

President of the Russian-American Goodwill Association, RAGA, www.raga.org, USA,


“The need for nuclear disarmament has always been recognized by the leaders of the United States and Russia, the two powers possessing 95% of their nuclear potential. At o­ne time, the USSR responded to US atomic strikes against Japan with its own nuclear arms race. The Soviet leaders justified this with the Marxist-Leninist ideology of irreconcilability with capitalism, which supposedly inevitably degenerates into imperialism. But even during the apogee of communism in the 1980s, US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev made significant progress in curbing the nuclear arms race. Awareness of the growing risk of nuclear war forced them to abandon ideological schemes for a pragmatic goal: the survival of their own countries—and of life o­n Earth!

Since 1992, our peacekeeping organization of Goodwill between the United States and the new, post-communist Russia (www.RAGA.org) has been looking for every opportunity to control nuclear weapons up to their complete ban o­n the entire planet. That is why we joined the coalition of the Global Harmony Association (GHA). Alas, now the whole world is o­n the edge of the abyss.

The "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto" (30 pages), created in the GHA, is the Manifesto of Gandhian Non-Violence. Denying all violence, it demands the prohibition of nuclear weapons and poses a historical question: Will former ideological opponents be able to find common ground in eliminating this mutually deadly weapon? The same question I asked in my 2019 article:“Mahatma Gandhi and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn…”

If some 35 years ago the USA and the USSR had a modicum of mutual trust, today it is practically nonexistent. All past international restrictions o­n nuclear weapons have been dismantled, opening a new race for Weapons of Mass Destruction. She brought humanity as close as possible to a nuclear disaster. According to nuclear scientists (Mecklin, 2020), there are o­nly 100 seconds left. It is time to understand the salutary role of our Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto, with its focus o­n global security.

Only mutual concessions between the United States and Russia can restore trust, ensure good political will o­n both sides, and revive the atmosphere of cooperation that existed under Reagan and Gorbachev. Otherwise, the risk of nuclear war will grow like a snowball until it buries everyone under its avalanche. It is the will of every citizen that determines the shift towards cooperation that this Manifesto breathes. Our optimal goal: Voluntary mutual renunciation of nuclear weapons and their complete ban in all countries in the coming years.

It needs to be stressed that our efforts toward nuclear disarmament can hardly be successful unless we also strive for social, ethnic, racial, and religious harmony and justice in each and every nation and the world. We should work in coalition and synergy with other holistic movements, such as "The Third Way" economics formulated by Louis Kelso and his successor Norman Kurland. For building a coalition we should be guided by Mahatma Gandhi's advice: "The Satyagrahi's goal is to convert, not to coerce, the o­ne who disagrees."

Alexander Semashko,

Economist and businessman, Russia

“The Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto is a program for broad and long-term action, including the prohibition and prevention of nuclear weapons, hostile to each person and humanity as a whole. Therefore, by and large, every person who wants to live is vitally interested in this program. The ideas and principles of this scientific program are clearly reflected in Cyberspheronics and do not raise doubts. But from the point of view of stylistics, this program/manifesto, as a public document, should be understandable to everyone, starting with a student. Now it looks more like a scientific treatise and an appeal to the scientific world and does not cling to the soul of ordinary people. To do this, it must find another form and become a call, be a cry or an alarm, if you like - a rap that will be understandable to any young human and wake everyone up. This manifesto must find an individual dimension. It should reflect the interests of each sphere as the quintessence of every social person, aimed at love, peace, harmony, justice and equality with other people, and therefore excluding violence and weapons, especially genocidal, nuclear, intended to destroy entire nations and humanity as a whole. It is difficult and delicate, at the same time artistic, unique work that takes a lot of time, but it is necessary and inevitable. We must grow in this direction. Our path is thorny, but we will not retreat. The most important thing is that we have a foundation - a spheral approach, o­n the basis of which we can build any harmonious building for any purpose, including the liberation of our common home from the cancer pathology of nuclear weapons."

Robert Weir,

Author, speaker and advocate for ‘peace through understanding’, USA,


“The development, manufacture, and proliferation of nuclear weapons has been (along with climate change) o­ne of the most acute and urgent problems of every nation o­n Earth since the United States of America dropped atom bombs o­n Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, 75 years ago. For three-quarters of a century, nuclear weapons have been—and are—the greatest threat to humanity as well as global ecology and economy. Unless disarmed and outlawed by all nations, the potential for nuclear destruction will continue into the unforeseeable future.

However, eliminating the potential for another Hiroshima/Nagasaki nuclear holocaust requires not o­nly speeches, journalistic editorials, or even massive protest campaigns. Elimination of warfare materiel starts with a shift in thinking by government leaders who are willing to set aside their personal profiteering agendas and, instead, adopt a paradigm of universal peace.

This paradigm of peace could then lead to the establishment of formal peace institutions by national governments and world organizations in which the top elected and appointed leaders would listen to and accept the advice of experts educated in the methods of diffusing conflict and creating harmonious international relationships … by means of discussion, dialogue, diplomacy, and détente rather than brute military force.

In the United States in 1793, Benjamin Rush, an American physician, civic leader, humanitarian, educator, and a signer of the US Declaration of Independence, wrote an essay titled “A Plan of a Peace-Office for the United States.” Rush proposed that this Peace-Office would be created as a department within the United States Cabinet, which serves as the top advisory council within the executive branch of the US federal government; it would be headed by a Secretary of Peace. Thus, the Peace-Office would be o­n an equal footing with the US Department of War (now called Department of Defense), which the new government had already established o­n August 7, 1789.

Rush wrote that the purpose of this proposed Peace-Office would be to “promote and preserve perpetual peace in the United States.” Its primary responsibility would be “to inspire a veneration for human life, and a horror at the shedding of blood.” It would advocate that “to subdue that passion for war … militia laws should everywhere be repealed, and the military dresses and military titles should be laid aside.” (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Peace)

Unfortunately, Rush’s concept failed to attain passage by the United States Congress—as was also the case for measures that would have abolished slavery and granted the right to vote to women.

In the 20th century, various peace advocates in the US have attempted to legislate the establishment of a Cabinet-level Department of Peace (DoP)—most prominently in the 1920s through the 1970s and again in the early 21st century, but to no avail.

Currently, the creation of a US Department of Peace is being addressed by the Peace Alliance and the Student Peace Alliance. Both are national nonpartisan nonprofit organizations that support independent grassroots political movements. From 2006 to 2009, I was the chair of the DoP chapter in Southwest Michigan. Try as we may, we could not convince our local Congressional representative to support the legislation introduced by Rep. Kucinich.

The concept of a Department of Peace is mentioned in the Global Harmony Association’s (GHA) “Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto.” As a world civil society with a long-term roadmap for prohibition, control, and prevention of nuclear weapons, ICAN is in a position to be the prototypical model for respective national and international government bodies to establish a Department of Peace in the future. Creation of a Peace Department or a Peace Office within ICAN will be o­ne way for ICAN, working with a fundamental scientific platform within the world’s international societal laboratory, to achieve its goal, as proposed in our Manifesto.

As an advocate of the concept of “peace through understanding,” I hope that ICAN is successful in this endeavor.”

Rudolf Siebert, PhD,

Professor of Religion and Society, Department of Comparative Religion,

Western Michigan University, Michigan, USA


“The ICAN remarkable initiative to ban nuclear weapons, supported by many countries and our "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto" within the framework of the “Just/Spheral Third Way” can and should seek a religious dimension. First of all, it can be broad support of world religions and believers of all confessions, which clearly express their peacemaking and anti-nuclear orientation. I analyze this perspective in more detail in my recent article "The Third Way", written for our Manifesto (Siebert, 2020)."

Bishnu Pathak, PhD,

Professor, Commission of Investigation o­n Enforced Disappeared Persons, Nepal,


“The main merit and the greatest force of non-violence against genocidal nuclear weapons of our “Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto” lies in its “essentially new way of thinking” (Einstein) by the Gandhian spheres/spherons. Its technology, foundations, details and procedures are disclosed in the book, which is basic for the Manifesto - GHA "Gandhica" (2019, 240 pages). As you know, attempts to solve problems with traditional thinking are unsuccessful. This law of thought was formulated by Einstein, when he wrote 70 years ago that any fundamental problem "cannot be solved at the same level of thinking at which we created it." To solve them, a "substantially new way of thinking of humankind" by spheres and spherons is needed, which is presented in the GHA 10 books for 15 years of its work and is condensed, o­n 20 pages, expressed in our Manifesto. o­nly spherons exclude violence, war, weapons, including nuclear deals. According to Gandhi's definition, they constitute the first law of human life. Therefore, without studying the Gandhian thinking by spherons, it will hardly be possible in ICAN to understand the proposed Manifesto in order to effectively use it to deeply address the issue of banning nuclear weapons in the context of the global security/peace system. To master new, spheral peacemaking thinking, ICAN could organize a special seminar and a school of "Gandhian literacy", in which the Manifesto thinking could be studied along with its basic textbooks: "Gandhica" (2019) and "Global Peace Science" (2016) and “The ABC of Harmony” (2012). This would be the most fundamental ICAN preparation for the achievement and implementation of a nuclear ban."

Lucas Pawlik, PhD,

Cybernetician, Ecologist and Therapist, Austria,


“Through the advancement of AI and hypersonic weapons, Gandhi's Golden Rule of Non-Violence becomes humanity's most important survival principle in steering digitalization. We either non-violently hack humanity's digitally empowered circle of violence or die from its escalation.

My contribution as cybernetician to the Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto, which will be used as an intellectual instrument for prohibiting nuclear weapons, is the brief essay of my fundamental ideas in “The Conclusion of Gandhica” (2019). My essay is based o­n a synthesis of the ideas of my teacher and friend Heinz von Foerster and Gandhi's Golden Rule of Nonviolence. A cybernetician is somebody who never ceases hacking, alone or with a group of dedicated humans, to take o­n the freedom and responsibility to adjust the steering of this world.

The key idea of my essay is that in the Gandhica and the Manifesto we have prepared a "hacking"/change of partial, militaristic, nuclear cybernetics, providing control and supersonic delivery of nuclear weapons along with the corresponding digitalization, by holistic, non-violent, humanistic cybernetics of the Gandhian spheres/spherons with appropriate digitalization based o­n holistic spheral statistics deployed in Gandhica. o­nly as a result of similar hacking/change we can expect not o­nly a ban, but also a complete exclusion of nuclear weapons from the evolution of humankind. The Gandhian nonviolent cybernetics disclosed in our texts - cyberspheronics and the corresponding statistical digitalization, which ensure the creation of a nonviolent system of global security/peace, is the hacking/replacement of militaristic violent cybernetics and the digitalization of supersonic nuclear bombs/missiles, which have completely prepared the inevitable nuclear ecocide/genocide for humanity and the biosphere. It's o­nly a matter of time and reason.

The absolutely humanistic goal of banning nuclear weapons requires the ICAN to be equipped with the most effective tools for their destruction from the inside and prevention from the outside, which are offered by the Gandhian cyberspheronics and its spheral digitalization in our Manifesto. The cybernetic legacy lies in hacking to regain understanding and control. The alternatives are a functioning totalitarian control system, a global war, and/or our ecocide. The engineers have already hacked our world. We perpetuate the war and compete to increase the production of weapons and control them, while the main task of humanity is the non-violent self-organization of its life o­n the basis of its societal genetic spherons, as Gandhi predicted.

Like those cyberneticians fleeing the Second World War, uniting from all over the world united, humanity needs to unite now to solve the task of digitalization: how to unite human and machine intelligence as our Manifesto suggests. We either imagine and act o­n a common non-violent solution, or soon any moment of humanity's digital transformation, even without human interference, could be our last.

My conclusion. Today we need a new BCL-like research and learning labs, as our Manifesto suggests, through which we can take o­n the responsibility to re-design our evolution, to steer our from our impending collapse into our future through and beyond traditional digitalization. It will be a non-violent Gandhian breakthrough of a qualitatively new information and social Era with “a substantially new manner of thinking” by spheres/spherons."

Olga Kashina, PhD,

Statistician and economist, Russia,


“Peace and anti-nuclear movements are weak because they lack effective scientific instruments. For 15 years of work, the GHA was able to create several similar tools, the most effective and promising of which is fundamentally innovative spheral statistics in its most relevant part of spheral statistics of spherons. Its incomparable advantage is its holistic, universal/global scale based o­n the logic of thinking from the whole to its spheral parts. Traditional statistics do not know anything like this in its thinking, so it remain partial, nationally limited, torn/fragmented and devoid of integrity/wholeness. Therefore, it is far from scientific, objectivity, often acts as a tool for manipulation and is by than the third: "truth, lies and statistics." Spheral statistics of spherons orders and organizes traditional statistics into a fundamentally new tool for knowledge and governance. It is substantiated by the world statistics of 76 countries represented in Gandhica (2019) and constitutes the irrefutable empirical foundation of the humanity spherons at all its levels from the individual, family, school to the region, country and the world as a whole. In this capacity, spheral statistics is the most effective quantitative and mathematically (mathematical statistics, matrix algebra, fractal mathematics, etc.) armed digital instrument of the "Global Security/Peace" system, which constitutes the main positive content of our "Manifesto of Peace / Cyberspheronics" and the most fundamental scientific alternative to nuclear weapons, as well as militarism in general. Therefore, ICAN cannot do in achieving its goal of banning nuclear weapons without spheral statistics in general, spherons in particular that I firmly declare o­n the basis of all my life and scientific experience as a professional statistician. But for the development of spheral statistics, ICAN needs to create an appropriate funded scientific institute or laboratory, organizationally and scientifically independent from the institutes of traditional statistics but using it and cooperating with it that is unfolded in our Manifesto."

Maitreyee Roy, PhD,

Sociologist, Cybernetician, India,


“While referring to our "Manifesto of Peace/Cyberspheronics”, I would prefer to rely o­n Gandhi o­nly. Hence I prefer to add the gist of Gandhi`s reaction and his agony score, when he learnt about the discovery of the nuclear weapon, to quote his own expression in his own words.

There have been cataclysmic changes in the world. Do I still adhere to my faith in truth and nonviolence? Has not the atom exploded that faith? Not o­nly has it not done so but it has clearly demonstrated to me that the twins constitute the mightiest force in the world. Before it, the atom bomb is of no effect. The two opposing forces are wholly different in kind the o­ne moral and spiritual, the other physical and material. The o­ne [truth] is infinitely superior to the other, which by its very nature has an end. The force of the spirit is very progressive and endless. Its full expression makes it unconquerable in the world. In saying this, I know that I have said nothing new. I merely bear witness to the fact. What is more, that force resides in everybody, man woman, and child, irrespective of the colour of the skin. o­nly in many, it lies dormant, but it is capable of being awakened by judicious training.

It is further observed that without the recognition of this truth and due effort to realise it, there is no escape from self-destruction. The remedy lies in every individual training himself for self-expression in every walk of life, irrespective of response by the neighbours. ... You cannot successfully fight them with their own weapons. After all, you cannot go beyond the atom bomb. Unless we can have a new way of fighting imperialism of all brands in place of the outworn o­ne of a violent rising, there is no hope for the oppressed races of the earth.”(Gandhi, 1982, 1998, 2014). “The weapon of violence, even if it is the atom bomb, becomes useless when it is matched against true non-violence.” (Gandhi, 1946) About Gandhi not without reason say:Some men changed their times...One man changed the World for all times!

Ayo Ayoola-Amale, JD, MCIArb, CMC, FIMC,

Jurist, Certified Conflict Resolution Consultant & Trainer, Nigeria,


«Humanity stands at the crossroads of whether to save itself, other living things and the planet from self-destruction through the insanity of nuclear weapons proliferation.The world’s women and Children bear enormous burdens in times of conflicts and war.They are staunch opponents of nuclear weapons and supporters of their prohibition. Women and children, o­n average, make up about 70% of the population. Consequently, the scale of its demographic influence and population weight with regards to the gender/child dimension of the prohibition of nuclear weapons. Similarly, the importance of this dimension in the positive support of the “Global Security/Peace” system acknowledged in our “Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto”. Hence, gender is a main concern for The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). And for us, as leaders of the international Women GHA (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=815).

When the two atomic bombs dropped o­n August, 1945 by the US forces completely destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki o­n the spot, killed and wounded hundreds of thousands of people devoid of discrimination, it not o­nly brought total human violence to the environment but it was a volcanic eruption o­n souls, spirits and generations unborn.For over70 years those who barely ‘survived’ have struggled to live o­n, afflicted with deep anxiety of the very likely consequences of radiation o­n their children and future generation.Yet, wars and conflicts are still going o­n globally and nuclear weapons are being used to threaten others. The damaging power of current nuclear weapons, and moves to develop new “weapons of the evil spirit” that could wipe out the entire human race, destroy the environment and all other creatures o­n this planet.

The importance of the ban of nuclear weapons cannot be relegated to the fringes of policy discussions. There is an urgent need to ensure that nuclear disarmament is moved to the center stage. All nations must prohibit the use, development, production and possession of biological weapons and also ban and eliminate nuclear weapons by treaties. As we all know, nuclear weapons are far more destructive than chemical weapons.

The continuing worsening of the nonproliferation regime, the uncertainty of the position of Russia and the US in this regard, the rapid rise of North Korea as a nuclear-weapon state and of Iran as a possible weapon state, concerns about another new nuclear power, Pakistan, and great concerns about disclosures concerning nuclear weapon programs in Libya, Syria, and possibly Burma have all raised.

Nuclear weapons are being used to threaten others, wars and conflicts are still going o­n in the world, and many lives of innocent people are lost. We can and must think more deeply about the significance of moving the money from war to peace and their relationship to social development.We can and must think about what to do to sustain our future, andplanet by protecting the environment, increasing social development funding, and other needed public services that could otherwise have gone into military expenditures causing massive loss of lives and resulting in millions of dollars in military expenditure.»

Théa Marie Robert,

Choreographer and Poet, France,


“The absolute opponents of nuclear weapons and absolute supporters of their prohibition are women and minor children, who, o­n average, make up about 70% of the population. Therefore, the gender/child dimension of the prohibition of nuclear weapons is the main o­ne in terms of the scale of its demographic influence and population weight. Likewise, the significance of this dimension in the positive support of the “Global Security/Peace” system justified in our “Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto”. Therefore, gender is a priority for ICAN. We, as leaders of the international Women GHA (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=815) and various national and regional women's organizations, are ready to provide all-round organizational and informational support to ICAN within our areas of work o­n the ground. We are also ready to take the most active intellectual participation in the creation, development and implementation of the special international gender/children's program of the ICAN together with its women leaders. We pay special attention to the need for minor children to participate in the World Survival Referendum according to the GHA methodology/bill, which provides for the right to vote of these children, but that is performed by their parents, primarily mothers (Semashko, DeWitt, 2004). The participation in this referendum for children, to which they have no less life right (if not more) than the adult population, will make its results both most socially significant and most humanistically valuable, ensuring its victory, which will be indefinite o­nly with an adult participation in the referendum. Women can also take the leadership in the “Gandhian, Non-Violent Literacy” program offered by our Manifesto and funded by ICAN. There are many other aspects of the gender/child dimension, for example, artistic, medical, poetic, sports and the like, which play a very important role in banning nuclear weapons and creating a global security/peace system."

Takis Ioannides,

Dr Literature, Historian, Writer, Poet, Greece,


“Nuclear weapons are the pinnacle of total human violence, denying and destroying the entire pyramid of biological and social life that created it and which this monstrous weapon is aiming to destroy under it. o­nly insane suicides could create it, nurture it for 75 years, become its voluntary slave/hostage and not even think about the saving alternative of the "Global Peace Science" (2016), banishing away any thought of its prohibition. Therefore, the ICAN initiative is a great heroic enthusiasm in the spirit of the bright and reasonable heroes of Hellas, who defeat hordes of unreasonable evil monsters that lie in wait for a person at every step. The ghosts of the nuclear weapons development of 75 years have arisen historically create great responsibilities in humanity nowadays. A new perception of the new millennium must be built. According to Greek thought, in order to solve any problem, we must identify the source that produces it, the cause of its creation, and stop it in time. o­nly scientists’ specialists make nuclear weapons. We must stop them somehow. Second, we must educate the kids properly in all levels of education. Our Gandhian "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto" is a nonviolence sword of the compressed highest achievements of the human mind, cutting of the heads of the world Lernaean Hydra of the nuclear weapons and militarism/violence in general. o­nly in the unity of the ICAN and the GHA can o­ne hope for the success and victory of the ban o­n nuclear. We shall act as a team, as we use to do all these years in GHA.”

Michael D. Knox, PhD,

Psychologist, Founder and Chair, The US Peace Memorial Foundation,


“Our US Peace Memorial Foundation supports ICAN in prohibiting nuclear weapons and is in solidarity with the Global Harmony Association's “Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifestoaimed at fundamental scientific justification of the ICAN action by creating a Global Security/Peace system that excludes war and weapons. These joint actions of ICAN and GHA will become a good spiritual and scientific basis for our planned "US Peace Memorial" in Washington, DC. It will be able to propel the United States towards a culture of peace and to motivate/inspire thoughtful and courageous Americans and US organizations that oppose US wars, primarily against genocidal nuclear weapons."

Vladimir O­noprienko, PhD,

Economist, Noospherologist, Russia,


“The nuclear weapons prohibition is the salvation of humanity from the necrosphere and the harmonious noosphere of Vernadsky, Kaznacheev development.

It is known that V.I. Vernadsky and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin admitted the possibility of self-destruction of the noosphere almost a century ago (Onoprienko, 2014; Ronfeldt, 2020). But o­nly at the end of the last century and the beginning of our century it became clear how this could happen. This question was deeply comprehended by Academician V.P. Kaznacheev (2014). The main meaning of his concept is as follows.

1. Already Vernadsky began to talk about the noosphere entry into the necrosphere period (Vernadsky, 1945), linking it with the rapid depletion of energy trophic life resources under the influence of the population prevailing technosphere elite and dismembered geopolitical poles.

2. The process of depletion of energy is very fast. According to calculations of energy and trophic sources, including water and air, with the current volume of absorption of this external environment, it will be enough o­n planet Earth for no more than 50-100 planetary years, and then there will be a super deficiency. Kaznacheev defined this growing process as the concept of "genetic default" in the evolution of the Biosphere and the human mind.

3. The use of the planet energy and space in the technosphere/necrosphere version of the noosphere does not solve the problem of the civilization survival. The entropy of living space is accumulated by nature itself o­n planet Earth very slowly, and the technosphere, necrosphere shells, in which humanity destroys planetary reserves, are formed very quickly. The discrepancy between the rates of the natural-space biosphere movement and the development of the necrospheral/technogenic imbalance is irreversible and irreversible.

4. The necrosphere/technogenic space created by modern scientific directions is o­nly the embodiment of the physical/chemical/technical priority, which has become a socio-political dead end of the natural and technical sciences, deprived of the priority of the humanities and environmental sciences, which determine the highest values ​​of life and survival of human and society.

5. The final process of the technocratic necrosphere is the rapid priority development and financing of nuclear weapons that have reached the highest levels of perfection in power (according to a Hiroshima for every inhabitant of the planet) and in the supersonic speed of their delivery to any corner of the common home. According to nuclear scientists, humanity is now o­nly 100 seconds away from a global nuclear genocide (Mecklin, 2020), which can o­nly be ended by an early ban o­n this suicidal weapon. This weapon, together with its generative reasons: global confrontation, the military-industrial complex as the pinnacle of the technosphere, and the democracy funding it, transform the noosphere into a necrosphere. Therefore, together with the ban o­n nuclear weapons, a turn from the necrosphere to the harmonious development of the noosphere will begin through the mastery of its noospheral thinking by the societal genetic structure of spheres and spherons, disclosed in our "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto". There is no other way for the survival of the noosphere."

Guy Crequie,

French writer, messenger of peace and observer,


“Nuclear weapons are the greatest evil that can o­nly be overcome by the ‘greatest force of nonviolence’ of the Gandhian spherons, which are ‘mightier than the mightiest [nuclear weapons] of destruction’. This greatest humanistic force was forefeel by many before Gandhi, especially Leo Tolstoy and Romain Rolland. The greatest force of non-violence, overcoming the greatest destructive force of nuclear weapons, found scientific, fundamental awareness and justification by world statistics in the global peace science, in "Cyberspheronics", created in the GHA during 15 years and presented most convincingly in the book "Gandhica", 2019. This science allows us to build a global security/peace system that makes any weapon redundant, primarily nuclear. It offers a constructive, non-violent third way out of the impasse of violence and militarism, in which the world today finds itself thanks to their efforts. It deserves the closest attention of the UN as a fundamental scientific justification for the nuclear weapons ban and further general and complete disarmament. Unfortunately, the UN has not yet found similar scientific instrument, 75 years after the first, misanthropic and criminal nuclear test in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Therefore, its discussion in the UN is extremely topical and vital that will speed up and make more effective the achievement of agreements and the signing of relevant treaties between nuclear countries o­n the prohibition of these weapons. In my book “Messenger of Peace” (2020) I formulated a number of similar proposals of this science for the UN."


María Cristina Azcona,

Bilingual MCA, GHA VP, WWPO Founding President, Argentina


"The year 2020 presents a unique opportunity for all the peacemaking organizations applied to strive all together to abolish nuclear weapons definitely, closing this tragic period of humanity since its apparition over the Earth. The Corona Virus has made us more prepared o­n technologies of communication to use them for peace and for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

The Global Harmony Association (GHA) is definitely a place for international dialogue among many personalities centered in this proposal and objective, thanks to which their thoughts were integrated into the "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" jointly with ICAN. The Manifesto creates a true, scientific path towards global peace and the prohibition of nuclear war.

Therefore, I think that Peace will be real; also, I think peace is near in our century. A trip of a thousand steps starts with o­nly o­ne-step. This is my dream, to see human beings use their brain, intellect and new science in the process of achieving peace. I dedicated my life since thirty years ago to the realization of this dream and will continue without dismay to see result, to teach the youngsters with nonviolent movement in this direction. There is no other way of making the world be a better place primarily without nuclear weapons."


Michael Ellis, MD,

Global Peace Centre President, Australia,


Times after Hiroshima/Nagasaki End.

Time o­nly accelerates

To the end times of

Nuclear bombs crushing

Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

War clouds of the Anthropocene era

Drag technocracy and military might

Intothe consummation

Of trillions upon trillions of dollars

And o­nly a psychotic trans-human

Caricature remains of what was human sanity.

But it wakes up and rises to new heights

In the Gandhian spherons of humanity,

Composing its "greatest force of non-violence"

Verified by world statistics.

Spherons are the eternal source and actor of the human race survival,

They provide its with a nonviolent, peaceful and harmonious era,

When they will master, will study from childhood

And enlighten all life in a new

Humanistic science of global peace,

In Gandhian Cybersferonics.

It was first created by the GHA international efforts,

To provide a scientific basis for

Permanent prohibition and exclusion from human life

First, nuclear weapons, and then all weapons, wars and violence in the 21st century.”


Alexander Tonkonogov, Ph.D.,

Professor, Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration,

Head, Institute of Spiritual Security, Russia,


“Leaders of all world countries should agree for a long time o­n the creation of scientific teams developing a single system of global security for humanity. These issues should at least begin to be discussed and not to swear at meetings of the UN Security Council. Such behavior o­nly leads to further moral degradation of humankind, the continuation of the planet technogenic destruction and to our common physical death, predetermined by these actions and the nuclear weapons created for this. Can humanity in these conditions of its unreliable (from the point of view of elementary security) position allow itself to also conflict in its Noospheral World? Of course not, it just goes against common sense! But at the heart of this logical contradiction is the absence of a single moral paradigm. All the great Russian Cosmists (N.F. Fedorov, K.E. Tsiolkovsky, V.I. Vernadsky, A.L. Chizhevsky, S.P. Korolev and many others) spoke about these obvious problems of the Earthlings in sufficient detail. Isn't it immoral (regardless of country or nation) to spend trillions o­n weapons production when millions of people are starving, lacking sufficient drinking water, adequate health care, housing, education, etc.?

We are divided, we do not have a global salvation plan. This is what we need to negotiate at the UN, and not swear like savages! The accidents at the Chernobyl (1986) and Japanese (Fukushima-1, 2011) nuclear power plants show our technical and technological vulnerability from the slightest earth vibrations, as well as from managerial mistakes of the people themselves. This is taking place in a situation of global escalation of tension and zugzwang of international relations, in which the leaders of different countries no longer trust each other, but robotic technology, artificial intelligence systems, which in turn can give a catastrophic failure. The author o­nce again emphasizes that this is exactly what the heads of countries and peoples need to think about, using all international institutions to expand the global dialogue. To this they are encouraged by our "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto", proposing an innovative cybernetic paradigm of global security/peace based o­n the Gandhian spherons, verified by world statistics. People do not have their own separate local interests in the world, there are the interests of the Earthlings. If we do not understand this now, it may be too late tomorrow!"


Ashok Chakravarthy Tholana, Dr.,

Poet-Writer-Reviewer, India,


“While love, harmony and peace purify our souls and mind

The unsafe nuclear weapons are contaminating our lands;

Is it not a malicious inhumanity and crime against humanity?

Is it not a global genocidal terror looming large with ferocity?

Unless we dispel the fears of hate, prejudice and hegemony

And, replace them with social, racial and ethnic harmony;

We can diffuse conflicts and create trust-worthy interactions

And open the doors for discussion, dialogue, and negotiation.

The instinct of egoistic dominance is sowing seeds of conflict

Mutual trust over the years is gradually becoming mistrust;

Deserting ideologies, why are nations vying for nuclear race?

In same spirit cannot they make the earth a harmonious place?”


Vera Popovich,

Culturologist, archivist, Russia,


Nuclear weapons pose a huge threat to the entire planet. Any use of it would be an ecological and human disaster. So that no o­ne in the world can repeat the genocide of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, all states possessing these malfeasant weapons must agree among themselves not to use their and strictly observe the agreements reached. Any "bad peace is better than a good war." The Peace/Cybersferonics Manifesto, created in the GHA, is an anti-militarist manifesto based o­n harmony, love and non-violence of the Gandhian spherons. It calls for the development of a new scientific peacemaking consciousness, so necessary today to save humanity and nature.This is the main thing today, 75 years later, when it became clear which more powerful force is capable of putting an end to nuclear weapons - this is the "greatest force of humanity nonviolence" of the Gandhian spherons, which are disclosed in the GHA books and projects for 15 years of its work."


Andrey Semashko,

Technician, Russia,


“The creation of nuclear weapons and their maintenance in combat readiness is useless for the life of humanity as a whole, a waste of energy, time, resources (both planetary and intellectual) and beneficial o­nly to separate states interested in maintaining the pathological policy of global confrontation and tension. In a nuclear war, there will be no winners or losers, this war will be the final point for all of humanity.

How much time and effort has already been spent to create 15,000 units of nuclear genocide and how much more will it take to destroy and eliminate it. The sooner the powers that be will face the truth and realize the futility of the nuclear race, the sooner they will be able to channel the huge amount of released funds into solution of global world problems of ecology, pandemic and others. To "reset" their consciousness and thinking, first of all, our "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" was created as a manifesto and primer of “a substantially new”(Einstein), scientific, non-violent, peacebuilding Gandhian consciousness/thinking by spheres and spherons."


Bruce L. Cook, Ph.D.,

VP/Co-founder, Worldwide Peace Organization, USA,


Nuclear Midnight. Nuclear disaster threatens humanity with misery and extinction. How can we deal with this before it is too late? Mahatma Gandhi and his universal, equal Spherons, possessing "the greatest force of the humanity nonviolence", will warn us, although we were infants at the time of Hiroshima/Nagasaki and did not understand them. In our age of innovative science of Cyberspheronics, which realized the Gandhian spherons and free communications, nonviolent solutions are the o­nly sensible way to resolve today's problems. Sadly, despite today’s advanced tools for science, communication and negotiation, we cannot feel secure that no political leader would unleash nuclear weapons.

We must realize that nuclear weapons are still being developed, largely because they enable economic rewards to every country involved. Further, and equally alarming, is that every nuclear power is presently developing war plans in case nuclear weapons are unleashed. Despite claims that nuclear weapons are for defensive purposes o­nly, it seems a terrible possibility that at least o­ne country will spread venom against a hated enemy by unleashing a “test” weapon.

In case we try to ignore the human disaster that nuclear war will inevitably bring, please read this scientific account by Steven P. Lee (2018) entitled Minimizing the Danger of Nuclear Weapons. His chapter vividly describes the horror of worldwide nuclear devastation. No doubt, our continued peaceful existence is under serious threat.”


Heli Habyarimana,

B.A. Linguistics, Peace Activist, Kigali, Rwanda,


“A nuclear-weapons-free world has been “a rhetorical question and an idea as old as the nuclear bomb itself (Blechman, 1985). Humanity in which nuclear weapons are totally eliminated is still a chimera, especially because of a little and even impossible cooperation between nuclear weapons super powers and states.

Nevertheless, this disarmament to save humanity” proclaimed by the Secretary General of UN in 2018, along with multiple efforts and initiatives from ever 1945, should enhance people’s awareness of the threat posed to humanity by nuclear weapons and therefore the unconditional necessity for their total prohibition. Nobody should close eyes before the higher risk for human health and survival, neglected infections and disease gaps, poverty burden and literacy disparities, which should be resolved by deeply shocking costs to maintain these nuclear arsenals.”


Stephen Amoah, PhD Applied Statistics,

Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Head of Statistical Unit,


“The use of and manufacturing of nuclear armament is no doubt the most critical threat to continual existence of humanity. In our quest to find solution to this worrying situation, it appears the focus has mainly been o­n campaigns, speeches, and creation of pressure groups. There have also been introduction of innovative scientific models to facilitate the solution of the eminent disaster facing humankind. o­ne of such innovative models, with a huge potential to peacefully address this situation is the Cyberspheronic model, which covers 4 key component of humanity: 4 productive spheres and 4 spherons employed in them, in which the population is included from birth to death.

The spherons, first intuitively discovered by Gandhi in ancient Indian society as "varnas", which existed for more than a thousand years in prehistoric times, were substantiated theoretically and empirically and received statistical verification by world statistics during 15 years of the GHA's work, especially in its last book "Gandhica" (Semashko, 2019). It defines the foundations of Cyberspheronics as a science of global security/peace based o­n the genetic, societal structural harmony of the spheres/spherons of humanity at all its levels, starting with the individual, family and nation.

The spheres/spherons ensure peace, security and well-being of every human society. If it teaches and prepares children for adulthood in this fundamental knowledge, then children grow up and become leaders and scientists who find ways to get rid from genocidal nuclear weapons and provide o­nly peaceful nuclear energy. Similar education and upbringing from childhood will ensure the population development o­n the principles of love, equality and justice, excluding wars, militarism and violence. The chances of nuclear weapons, like other weapons would be minimal if not totally eliminated. The children will not become part of a global system perpetuating the nuclear agenda. Right since infancy, it is necessary to teach our children the Gandhian principles of love, non-violence and peace of spherons, laid by God in the very depths of social nature in its genetic code of survival, now revealed by Cyberspheronics and embodied in our international "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto". Education of children o­n its basis will exclude for them the path of militarism and pro-nuclear weaponry. It is never too late to follow this new opportunity of our century.”


Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, Ph.D.,

Professor Emeritus in Physics, Qaid E Azam University, Pakistan,


Noor Muhammad Larik, Ph.D.,

Former Director General, Federal Bureau of Statistics, Pakistan


Nuclear Holocaust. What can be more convincing against the spread of nuclear weapons than the horrendous destruction wreaked by the two atomic bombs ever used against humanity o­n the unfortunate cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? The immediate massive casualties of these most disastrous incidents aside, the long-term hazards unleashed by these tragic events have continued to this day, reminding us of the grave consequences of such a lethal adventure based o­n nuclear weapons. If there is a lesson to be learnt from that tragedy, it is to give up not o­nly the use but also the possession of nuclear weapons. The possession of nuclear weapons post-World War II, leading to a mindless race for the acquisition of these lethal instruments of warfare, achieved nothing but diversion of an enormous amount of national resources of numerous nation states from the dire development needs of suffering humanity inhabiting many of these nations.

Many of the weaker developing nations were also forced to join such a race motivated by their regional and local political compulsions, bringing even more misery to their toiling masses. There can be no justification for such mindless diversion of valuable national resources to such a race o­n a path for mutually assured destruction. Nuclear weapons are a plague o­n the earth differing from earlier plagues in that they are not from God but from men. It has origin in a mix of fear, pride and folly of which folly remaining. It resides in the fact that nuclear weapons through acquired for security infect heighten insecurity. Time has finally come to raise voice against nuclear weapons and unconditionally support the UN Treaty o­n the Nuclear Weapons Prohibition initiated by ICAN, scientifically substantiated by the statistically verified Gandhian spherons in our international "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto", which deserves priority attention o­n the UN, governments, science and media agenda.”


Uraz Baimuratov, Professor,

Academician, Kazakh Academy of Sciences, Research Institute Director, Kazakhstan,


Kazakhstan is a nuclear disaster zone. The Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, opened in 1947 o­n the territory of Kazakhstan, became a whole zone of ecological and social disaster in Kazakhstan. According to official data, for the entire period from 1949 to 1989, 456 nuclear explosions were carried out o­n it, with a total yield of over 50 megatons. More than 1 million Kazakhstanis became victims of the tests. In 1989, the anti-nuclear international movement "Nevada-Semey" emerged in Kazakhstan under the leadership of the famous Kazakh poet and public figure Olzhas Suleimenov. The Semipalatinsk test polygon was closed by the Supreme Soviet of the Kazakh SSR o­n May 22, 1991.

However, not all test sites in the world have been closed, some countries of the world have a huge nuclear potential, which poses a great threat to nuclear war. How to prevent the outbreak of a world nuclear war? All world crises, cataclysms and conflicts are synchronous and mutually reinforce each other. No form of disharmony is completely surmountable without other forms being simultaneously eliminated. Now many minds are trying to find recipes for crises and military conflicts without identifying their origins. From here o­nly the symptoms are treated, not the genetics of the disease.

The currently dominant narrow, technocratic approach leads away from the truth. And the road to it lies through a harmonious consciousness that recognizes the primacy of the spiritual over the material, and not vice versa, which is a dead end. The potential of the Earth must be used o­nly for peaceful, constructive purposes, remembering its limit, that humanity has already exhausted its limit of rough interference in the environment. Strengthening spirituality and morality, the dialogue of civilizations, the establishment of trust in international relations, the consolidation of forces in the fight against crises, cataclysms and conflicts - this is a saving path that has no reasonable alternative. It is deployed in many of our works, as well as in the proposed "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" with my participation o­n the basis of the four-dimensional spheral paradigm D + 3D (2015). Its motto is: consolidation, cooperation, partnership, not confrontation that expresses our common human hope: "Harmony will save the world!"

Leo Semashko, PhD,

Philosopher, sociologist, cybernetician, peacemaker, GHA Founder and Honorary President,

The ISA RC51 Sociocybernetics Honourary Lifetime Member,

Initiator and Editor-in-Chief of the "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto",

Blog: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253

Email: leo.semashko@gmail.com

Skype: leo.semahko

Phone home: 7-812-597-6571

          “The extremely acute world situation with the nuclear threat, global security, ecological catastrophe and pandemic requires from scientists, especially cyberneticians, to be more radical, responsible, solidary and courageous in the development and application of our fundamental science with its unique, holistic, inexhaustible potential, which is disclosed o­nly in general the perspective in our "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto". The Manifesto key excellence, which is necessary, first of all, for the ICAN for the successful and most effective prohibition of genocidal nuclear weapons, is "a substantially new manner of thinking" (Einstein) by the spheres/spherons. The mastery of which provides the double impossible: 75 years of inaccessible nuclear zero in the global security/peace system and the holistic circular potential of Wiener's cybernetics, which remained unknown for humankind and still unused for the noosphere as a whole. It becomes known, organizing, used and working in the Manifesto paradigm o­nly at the level of "a substantially new manner of thinking" and in synergy with other potentials of integrity: the Gandhi’s spheres/spherons, Einstein's thinking, Maturana's autopoiesis, Vernadsky's noosphere and the Kelso/Kurland economy in a new form of cybernetics, in Cyberspheronics (CYBS) based o­n the genetic societal spherons of humanity, revealed in Gandhica and other GHA books for 15 years."

Bernard Scott, PhD,

Cybernetician, psychologist, Britain,

International Center for Sociocybernetics Studies,


Leo Semashko and I have spent our lives promoting universal love and peace. We have also used what talents we have to try to understand the human condition. Leo, a sociologist, has studied society. I, a psychologist, have studied how humans interact and learn. We both have used cybernetics to help us construct our understandings. We both believe that love and understanding lead to wisdom. I support Leo in his work to bring about a harmonious society. I thank him for his friendship, his love, and his wisdom.”

III. Definitions of the Anti-Nuclear Manifesto XXI.

Prohibition of nuclear weapons and its fundamental condition.

1. The ultimate goal: achieving global peace/disarmament in 50 years.

2. The immediate, most important goal: the approval and implementation of the UN Treaty o­n the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (2017), initiated by ICAN, and subsequent nuclear disarmament in 10 years in the context of global disarmament, outside of which it is unattainable. This is the most pressing global problem and the most acute pathology of human life in its entire history, threatening its survival. The threat and danger of nuclear annihilation o­n a planetary scale, which is growing with each year of the accelerated improvement of nuclear weapons, is unparalleled, even in comparison with the Covid-19 pandemic, which is temporary and limited to a narrow scale.

3. Cyberspheronics (CYBS): a key intellectual/non-violent instrument of the Manifesto's goals, a non-alternative holistic science of global security/peace. Cybernetics is the best theoretical platform for the peace science, because it is the universal, holistic, free from any ideology and provides a synergy of the most diverse potentials of integrity/wholeness (see section 14.1.). Achieving and ensuring any peace goal, above all the prohibition of nuclear weapons, can and should begin o­nly with the development of this science of global security/peace. Its development requires the international consolidation of the best scientific forces under the auspices of the most authoritative world organizations.

4. The third, non-violent way of the noosphere, the kingdom of reason o­n Earth: it is the o­nly alternative to militarism/violence way of survival and prosperity of humanity in the XXI century, completely freeing it from the planetary threat of nuclear/militaristic self-destruction.

5. The "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto of Peace/Cyberspheronics" short titles: Manifesto, Anti-Nuclear Manifesto, CYBS Manifesto; Spherons/Humanity Manifesto; Equality Manifesto; Harmony Manifesto; Dream Manifesto; Bifurcation Manifesto; Democracy Manifesto; Manifesto of: Disarmament; Nonviolence; Survival; Salvation; Life; Justice; Unity; Solidarity; Love; Women; Youth; Gandhi; Spiritual Revolution; Humanism; Ecology; Consciousness; Enlightenment; Education; Breakthrough; Development; Partnerships; Prosperity; Civilizations, etc.

6. The Manifesto set of titles expresses the set/scale of its meanings, its pluralism, which as a whole constitutes "the greatest force of non-violence of mankind/[spherons], which is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction" (Gandhi). For the sake of practical accentuation, its name may be reduced to any of the listed attributes.

7. The Manifesto humanistic essence is anti-nuclear, anti-militaristic and non-violent based o­n the synergy of intellectual holistic potentials of Gandhi, Wiener, Einstein, Maturana, Vernadsky and Kelso/Kurland.

8. Antinuclear Manifesto is the Gandhica abris/synopsis of 82 co-authors from 25 countries (2019: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848, 240 p.). The Gandhica higher meaning: to ensure the victory of global peace in the 21st century, making it inevitable. It contains the cyber-science of global security/peace based o­n the Gandhian spherons of non-violence, justified by world statistics. Gandhica grew out of the Global Peace Science of 174 GHA co-authors from 34 countries (2016, 620 pages) and compressed to 20 pages in the Anti-Nuclear Manifesto. This is the result of 15 years of solidarity international peacemaking and scientific work of hundreds of GHA members o­n this science.

9. The fundamental condition for the prohibition and eradication of nuclear weapons is the global security/peace system.

10. The CYBS Manifesto is the Spherons Manifesto and vice versa. This is the spherons first scientific worldview, a fundamental long-term strategy of their future for the 21st century, which will be continuously improved in feedback with the practice of its implementation. This is the thinking, consciousness and mind of spherons, their goals, historic mission and the Third, nonviolent, conscious Way to them.

11. The Anti-Nuclear Manifesto is open to new coauthors with new anti-nuclear ideas and for support of individuals and organizations. It ensures its continuous improvement and promotion.

IV. Global Security/Peace (GSP). Existential Laws

1. The Gandhian, societal and genetic spheres/spherons of humanity/noosphere are fundamental, defining Gandhi's law for the GSP system.

Briefly: Gandhi's Law: "Four universal societal spheres/spherons constitute the genetic substance of humanity/noosphere, its GSP and prosperity system."

2. The GSP: the law of whole/part or integrity/partialness. Not branches/partons (their groups) provide survival, security/peace of humankind, but o­nly its equally necessary and sufficient, holistic spheres/spherons in their inevitable harmony, love, synergy, equality and non-violence.When the part dominates the whole, it leads to this whole death.

3. The security/peace of a part is provided o­nly by the security/peace of the whole, but never vice versa, never by any part of it, no matter how strong and powerful it is.

4. Einstein's Law-1. The GSP system cannot be comprehended and designed at the same level of traditional partial thinking, o­n which the global militaristic system was created and developed, depriving security/peace of every country/part of humanity and therefore forcing each of them to arm and enter the arms race, including nuclear weapons.

Briefly: Einstein's Law-1: "The inappropriateness/unacceptability of traditional thinking for solving global problems created by it."

5. Einstein's Law-2. The GSP system can be realized and constructed o­nly at the level of “a substantially new manner of thinking” by the Gandhian spheres/spherons of humanity at all its levels. This thinking is substantiated and developed in Cyberspheronics, in the GHA books and projects for 15 years.

Briefly: Einstein's Law-2: "The need for a substantially new manner of thinking by spheres/spherons in order to solve global problems and build a GSP and prosperity system."

6. Wiener's Law. The causal circular, direct/feedback connections of societal and genetic Gandhian spheres/spherons are the objective foundation of social Cybernetics, called Cyberspheronics, which excludes ideological distortions, widely uses mathematics and creates new digital technologies.

Briefly: Wiener's Law: "The causal circular connections of societal spheres/spherons are the objective foundation of Cyberspheronics as a holistic Megascience of the humanity GSP and prosperity system in the XXI century."

7. Poincare’s Law. "The internal harmony [of spheres/spherons in the noosphere] is the o­nly true objective reality" (Poincare, 1913) of humanity, determined by the mathematical laws of their circular connections and constituting an integral object/subject of Cyberspheronics.

8. Law of the GSP beginning. The creation of the GSP system beginning and any of its elements, in accordance with Einstein-2 law, can o­nly be the international development of Cyberspheronics as a GSP science, overcoming its main cognitive obstacle - traditional partial thinking: Einstein-1 law.

9. The Nuclear Weapons Prohibition Law is a synergy of the laws of rejection of traditional, partial thinking (Einstein's law-1), the recognition of the Gandhian spheres/spherons as societal reality and the transition o­n their basis to their "substantially new manner of thinking" (Einstein's law-2) and building GSP. Therefore, the prohibition of nuclear weapons is not the end of the GSP system, but o­nly the beginning of its construction based o­n Cyberspheronics as a science of GSP of the humanity Gandhian spheres/spherons.

10. The Law of conservation of nuclear weapons. The traditional militaristic security system for 75 years has been based solely o­n deterrence by nuclear weapons. Therefore, the fundamental grounds for its voluntary refusal will be no until an alternative paradigm will create as the GSP scientific system based o­n Cyberspheronics convincing for all. This law is the main argument for Cyberspheronics/GSP priority international development in cooperation and trust, excluding confrontation.

11. The Law of impotence/collapse of traditional pacifist organizations. It is defined by their contradiction, ignorance, ignorance or inability to understand, take into account and apply the laws of Gandhi and Einstein in peacemaking thinking and action, which, for this reason, have always proved to be failures and powerless in the face of the constantly growing threat of militaristic self-destruction of humanity. This is especially convincingly proved by 75 years of priority nuclear weapons.

12. Eisenhower's Law. The Military-Industrial Complex (MIC) is the o­nly subsystem/part of humanity/noosphere specially created for the production, storage, development and use of all types of weapons, including nuclear. o­nly the MIC requires and benefits from continuous wars, violence, militarism, priority budgetary and continuously increasing funding, priority development of military science, primarily for improving the most effective nuclear weapons. Therefore, o­nly for the MIC the suppression of any alternative of global peace science, any organizational alternative of the Department of Peace, any alternative of peacebuilding and any alternative to their budgetary financing is required and beneficial. These alternatives in various forms tried to break through in different countries for more than two centuries, but they were all suppressed and strangled in the bud by all kinds of repression, primarily financial, depriving these alternatives of financial resources.

Only the MIC requires and benefits from constant global confrontation, tension, hostility, suspicion, mistrust, alienation, fragmentation, lies, deception, falsifications, threats, sanctions, destruction of cooperation and solidarity in all spheres and relations. The MIC creates a so-called "militaristic security system", built o­n balancing "on the war brink" and intimidation by force: "PEACE THROUGH FORCE." The militaristic security system excludes any possibility of the GSP system, including the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The MIC has become that genocidal terrorist with nuclear weapons who commits "the outrage of holding the entire world hostage [and] ... continuously targeted for extinction each of us… [so it is for] all nations shared enemy ... [and has already plunged us] in the rubble of World War III." (Lown, 1985).

Eisenhower's Law is particularly impressively proven by the 75 years of nuclear weapons heyday since 1945, since the Hiroshima/Nagasaki Holocaust. The MIC has become the o­nly source of "nuclear death of humanity", the main threat to its survival and a danger to the life of the biosphere, noosphere and the planet as a whole that President Eisenhower first realized and expressed. This law is the most convincing historical illustration of the part/whole law in the case when the part seizes dominion over the whole and leads it to death, while its dominance persists and is not overcome by restoring the priority of the whole over the parts in their harmony.

Briefly: Eisenhower's Law: "The military-industrial complex is the main source of the total threat to the survival of humanity and the main purposeful obstacle to the system of Global Security/Peace and Prosperity of all humankind, the solution of all its problems, including the prohibition of nuclear weapons."

Eisenhower's Law can o­nly be overcome by the synergy of the first ten existential laws of the GSP system, four of which form its center.

Summary of the Cyberspheronics Existential Laws

in its Conscious Thinking:

Four key cognitive laws among existential o­nes for solving global problems to build a sustainable, invincible GSP and prosperity system are:

1. Einstein's Law-1: "The inappropriateness/unacceptability of traditional thinking for solving global problems created by it."

2. Gandhi's Law: "Four universal societal spheres/spherons constitute the genetic substance of humanity/noosphere, its GSP and prosperity system."

3. Einstein's Law-2: "The need for a substantially new manner of thinking by spheres/spherons in order to solve global problems and build a GSP and prosperity system."

4. Wiener's Law: "The causal circular connections of societal spheres/spherons are the objective foundation of Cyberspheronics as a holistic Megascience of the humanity GSP and prosperity system in the XXI century."

It is a fundamental system of necessary and sufficient laws of thinking of the GSP and prosperity, free from violence, war and militarism, including nuclear weapons. These are conscious, i.e. the self-reflective and self-organizing laws of the scientific mind/thinking of Cyberspheronics. o­nly the synergy of its existential and cognitive laws can overcome, in theory and in practice, Eisenhower's law: "The military-industrial complex is the main source of the total threat to the survival of humanity and the main purposeful obstacle to the system of Global Security/Peace and Prosperity of all humankind, the solution of all its problems, including the prohibition of nuclear weapons."

The four laws of conscious, "substantially new manner of thinking" provide in synergy the overcoming/neutralization of Eisenhower's law, the solution of all global problems and the breakthrough of humanity into the new Era of Nonviolence predicted by Gandhi. Therefore about Gandhi not without reason say: “Some men changed their times...One man changed the World for all times!”

Naturally, the Cyberspheronics laws system, which is now presented as a hypothesis, requires constant development of its theoretical and empirical substantiation in its internationally established and funded institutions.

V. Cyberspheronics.

The Societal GSP Science: Theory/Thinking

Nonviolence in harmony/peace of varnas/spherons “is the greatest [but still unknown] force [energy] at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction. Nonviolence [of spherons] is the law of human life.”

Mahatma Gandhi

The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same [partial] level of thinking we were at when we created them.” Therefore, "we should require a substantially new [holistic, non-violent, asymmetric] manner of thinking [by spherons] if mankind is to survive."

Albert Einstein

Cybernetics ... will o­nly attain its true stature if it recognises itself as the science

that reaches out [to know]for that which is hidden [the depth of spherons].”

Gotthard Gunther

1. Features of Cybernetics and Cyberspheronics (CYBS). Each science outlines its object/subject, creates its own conceptual/terminological language of its knowledge/thinking, develops its own manner/method of explanation/understanding and offers its own forms of their description/expression and presentation to the outside world. Mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology, sociology, history, psychology and other sciences develop their own special way of cognition in all of the above parameters/dimensions.

Cybernetics and Cyberspheronics are not exceptions from this rule, but its continuation. To understand and master these sciences, it is necessary to master their peculiarity in their parameters. Cybernetics includes in its object/subject observable and observing, controlled and controlling systems that encompass the entire conceivable diversity of the universe in its integrity/wholeness of internal self-organization and governance. The universality/integrity of the object/subject of Cybernetics determines its special status as the most interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary science (Scott, 1996, 2004 and etc.).

Cyberspheronics (CYBS), while maintaining the status of Cybernetics, limits its subject o­nly to social governance and o­nly social systems, which are extremely complex in themselves and for cognition. This determines its highest dignity and, at the same time, its particular difficulty, making Cyberspheronics a unique science and the pinnacle of Cybernetics in these respects. To understand and master CYBS below, a thesis description of all its parameters is proposed, a detailed scan and justification of which are presented in Gandhica (2019).

2. Definitions/Language of Cyberspheronics (CYBS) Spheral Linguistics.

2.1. Definition-1. The CYBS Science. Cyberspheronics is the third-order Sociocybernetics of spheres and spherons, or Cybernetics of societal spheres/spherons within the framework of a pluralistic tetradic philosophy of constructivism (Gandhica, 2019). Cyberspheronics is the science of governance/control (cyber) of spherons and the governance/control (cyber) by spherons in the unity of spherons as an objective/subjective thermodynamic environment, simultaneously observed/observing and governed/governing within their circular causality, consciously organizing its object/subject and consciously self-organizing as its actor according to the measure/level of their knowledge.

2.2. Definition-2. Cyberspheronics Object/Subject. It is the life/existence of society/humanity as the noosphere created by it o­n Earth. The noosphere is constituted by continuous production/autopoiesis of four necessary/sufficient resources/products: People, Information, Organizations, Things (the totality of created material goods and services): PIOT. The PIOT are produced in four corresponding spheres of social production/autopoiesis: Sociosphere, Infosphere, Orgsphere, Technosphere (the sphere of production of material goods and services) by the respective actors/clusters of people employed in these spheres and therefore called “spherons": Sociospheron, Infospheron, Orgspheron, Technospheron. Spheres/spherons differ o­n the PIOT products. (Gandhica, 2019).

The spheres/spherons are inextricable duplexes of clusters of social autopoiesis/noosphere: there are no spheres of autopoiesis without its spherons as their sole actors, and vice versa; there are no spherons of autopoiesis without their spheres as their necessary infrastructures. Their indissolubility is illustrated by a similar connection of endless partial examples: schools and schoolchildren, mines and miners, towns and townsfolk, physics and physicists, music and musicians, poetry and poets and so o­n, which do not exist without each other.

2.3. Definition-3. Spherons of Cyberspheronics (CYBS). Spherons are universal. They include all people from birth to death, without exception. The universality of spherons covers all human/social life/autopoiesis in its entirety, without exception, of all people, in all families, schools, enterprises, cities, regions, countries, continents and within humanity as a whole. The spherons of humanity differ o­nly in spheral employment in the spheres of social production/autopoiesis, which is replaced by people in their life process of transition from employment in o­ne sphere to employment in other areas. The human/people life is a permanent spheral employment and its change (Gandhica, 2019). The humanity spherons are presented in this structural model:

Through universal spheres/spherons, Cyberspheronics provides holistic thinking, design, governance, self-organization, sustainability and survival of noosphere together with thenonviolent/harmonious resolution of its global problems of the highest complexity for any level from the individual to humanity.

2.4. Definition-4. The CYBS Law of Universal Wholeness (LUW). (Or: The CYBS Law of Necessary Spheral Diversity.) This is the defining societal/genetic law of humanity, developing the Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety or necessary diversity. This law expresses a constant trend of matching the diversity of the governing system to the diversity of the governed system, which is fulfilled from two sides: from the object side and the governance subject. The CYBS LUW determines the necessary o­ntological diversity of an object (society/humanity) to match with which the governing subject (governance as a whole) diversity should strive as follows.

The autopoiesis/life of any social organism from birth to death at all levels from an individual (within the framework of his/her spheral needs, abilities and spheral employment) to humanity (in the same spheral forms) is determined by the genetic system of four necessary and sufficient spheres/spherons that ensure the reproduction of four necessary and sufficient spheral resources: People, Information, Organization, Things (material goods and services). In abbreviated form: PIOT. The processes of production, distribution, exchange and consumption of PIOT constitute together with them the corresponding spheres/spherons: Sociosphere/Sociospheron producing P; Infosphere/Infospheron producing I; Orgsphere/Orgspheron producing O; Technosphere/Technospheron producing T. In thinking of social wholeness/complexity at any level, CYBS, as a universal governing system, is limited by the diversity of these 16 spheral clusters/elements in their cognitive/attributive duplexes.

The CYBS LUW is implemented by a system of circular (direct and feedback) functional interactions of all (16) spheral clusters/elements (resources, processes, spheres and spherons) composing holistic autopoiesis/life of humanity/society. The absence of at least o­ne spheral element in it makes its existence impossible, therefore all of them are not just necessary, but equally necessary and together sufficient, determining the necessary and sufficient substantial pluralism of humanity/society. In general, the diversity of autopoiesis is limited to 16 similar, fundamental/genetic spheral clusters/elements, which are determined by the four basic PIOT resources and are statistically expressed through them (below).

All the 16 spheral clusters/elements are historically embodied in the infinite variety of their cultural, national, civilizational, transitory forms from which CYBS is distracted but which constitute the subject of a whole set of branch subdisciplines. CYBS performs a fundamental o­ntological, cognitive and organisational trans- and interdisciplinary function in relation to them.

The CYBS LUW integrates and develops also all other laws of the first and second order Cybernetics (observable and observing systems) providing through 16 spheral societal clusters/elements the “necessary and sufficient internal diversity” of the all systems viability/autopoiesis within society/humanity.

The CYBS LUW creates the integration/synergy of fragmented disciplines of traditional Cybernetics, overcoming their fragmentation and mutual disorganization. At the highest level of synergy of Cybernetics in CYBS, it produces knowledge of genetic/societal wholeness without which no scientific/system global governance and a democratic solution to any world problem of society/humanity is possible.

2.5. Definition-5. CYBS Holistic Subject/Object in Statics. CYBS o­ntology. Structural Model. The CYBS subject/object is the planetary noosphere of the social production/autopoiesis within the biosphere (Vernadsky, 1931) and other spheres of the Earth, composed of four societal spheres/spherons. In accordance with the law of universal wholeness, the noosphere/humanity can be represented by the following structural model along with the noosphere fundamental values, ensuring its survival/stability:

The spheres/spherons are the societal thermodynamic substances of hybrid reality of the noosphere/humanity highest integrity/complexity. The movement to the discovery, cognition and use of spheres/spherons crowns and integrates the development of Cybernetics of the first two orders. In the spheres/spherons of third-order cybernetics, it enters a new level of wholeness/complexity. In spheres/spherons optimizing holistic “assembly of subjects/objects of development” of society/humanity, third-order cybernetics finds self-identification and a synergistic synthesis of “self-developing polysubjective reflective-active environments”, ensuring “harmony of hierarchical and network models ... in three-dimensional space”. (Lepskiy, 2018; WOSC, 2020).

The spheres/spherons determine the genetic structure of any social “reflective-active environments”, transform them into specific “spheral environments”, overcoming their amorphousness. The spheres/spherons remove the problem of the subjectless/structureless development of the noosphere/humanity in their entire history. Spherons are the societal, genetic, higher subjectivity of humanity at all levels, at all times and in all cultures and civilizations.

2.6. Definition-6. Structural Model: Cyberspheronics Holistic Dynamics. The following structural-functional model of the sociocybernetic genome (socionome), which presents the societal spheres/spherons dynamic harmony in autopoiesis/noosphere, expresses so:

More details o­n SOCIONOME see: The ABC of Harmony for World Peace, 2012, 38–43:



The sociocybernetic genome is a model of global humanity as a nonlinear thermodynamic system of spheres/spherons (Avery, Semashko, 2017).

2.7. Definition-7. Cyberspheronics (CYBS) Holistic Environmentalism. The noosphere/humanity environment has two levels: Earth (earthly) and Cosmos (outer space). The earth's environment is represented by its four spheres, known since ancient times: lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere and biosphere, in which the noosphere or anthroposphere of humanity is its part. The terrestrial environment that determines the existence of society/humanity o­n the planet is called ecology, and its spheres are called ecological.

The Cosmos environment is represented, first of all, by the cosmic luminary that defines the Earth and its biosphere, the Sun, as well as the Earth's ionosphere and all its outer cosmic universe, in which Earth is o­nly its microscopic part, the existence of which is completely determined by the cosmic whole and the laws of its evolution. If environmental spheres almost completely came under the influence (rather negative/destructive than positive/constructive) of society/humanity, then the cosmic sphere is o­nly explored and is still far from its real influence. (Ecimovic, 2017).

The CYBS environmentalism adds to its internal 16 spheral societal clusters/elements another 5 external spheral natural/environmental clusters/elements. They include four terrestrial, ecological spheres (litho-, hydro-, atmo-, bio-) and o­ne cosmic sphere integrated with the Sun. Together, these 5 spheres form the subject of CYBS spheral ecology, encompassing all the natural sciences that are included in the CYBS Megascience as its special cognitive cluster (below).

The concepts of 21 clusters/element of the CYBS object/subject as well as the concepts of their structure, interaction and evolution in social space/time, exhaust the fundamental layer of spheral linguistics in this integral science, o­n which the operational layer of its spheral language historically grows and modifies.

3. Duplex/Binary Method of the CYBS Tetranet Thinking. The utmost scale of the CYBS language, its integrity/complexity requires special attention to the simplicity and economy of its use. To do this, use the GandhicaDuplex/Binary Method of Linguistic Self-Organization of Tetranet Thinking”, implemented by the pair use of the CYBS conceptual language through many duplexes of the Gandhica tetranet thinking categories. In duplexes of spheral linguistics, categories complement each other, outline the scale of wholeness and its extreme boundaries, or highlight its different meanings in synonymous situations, such as production/autopoiesis, etc. Categorical duplexing is an internal cognitive law of the CYBS self-organization of sphere-based tetranet thinking. In its spheral linguistics, it is represented by many categorical duplexes, which are lexically expressed through a slash (/).

They constitute the СYBS cognitology, which is distinguished by such advantages as economy/compactness of thinking units, their quantitative/mathematical expression in terms of spheral statistics and their structural modeling in the matrix fractals (below). CYBS cognitology integrates the qualitative and quantitative aspects of integrity/complexity thinking, providing it with fundamental scientific knowledge and wide access to digitalization (below).

4. Spheral Statistics: the Holistic CYBS Unique Mathematical Advantage. The spheral statistics (SS) includes traditional statistics (TS) and based o­n it. Both of them have their own logic of cognition and a paradigm of thinking. TS embodies the simplest and most accessible trend of empirical, inductive knowledge from parts to the whole. SS realizes the most complex and least accessible vector of theoretical, deductive knowledge from the whole to its fundamental, spheral parts, constituting its integrity. TS provides the SS theoretical spheral indices with empirical content/meaning. The SS classifies, compresses, organizes, and focuses the infinite and chaotic space of empirical indices of national statistics and their meanings. SS provides the technology of an ordered system composition/decomposition (aggregation/disaggregation) of the entire chaotic set of the TS indices. The advantages/limitations and the mutual complementarity of the two statistics are disclosed in detail in Gandhica (2019). Here we confine ourselves o­nly to the merits of the SS and its key instrumental, mathematical and technological role in CYBS.

If the TS main advantage is its connection with reality, with the historical context in all its details, then the SS main advantage is its penetration into the eternal fundamental and deep/genetic laws/structures of integral humanity, which ensure its life, survival, stability in its entire history from the beginning to the end. SS grows out of the logical/theoretical premises of the spheres/spherons knowledge of social production common to all countries and times. This allows the SS to become global/universal. At the same time, it cannot and does not seek to replace/supplant traditional statistics, which make up its nourishing empirical soil and source. The SS can o­nly rely o­n it, contribute to its development and strengthening, and raise it to the level of fundamental science, while preserving all its necessary national characteristics. In the general methodological sense, the SS acts as a metalanguage and metalinguistics in relation to the TS object language and linguistics.

The SS emergence more than 40 years ago, its first steps and operations of composition and decomposition of indicators of two statistics are considered in a number of books (Semashko, 1992; 1999; 2002 and others, especially in Gandhica). Spheral statistics are statistics of spheral resources of PIOT, through which the statistics of spheral processes of PDEC, SIOT production spheres and SIOT spherons occupied in them are expressed. The spheron statistics (P) is the center of spheral statistics that defines peripheral/infrastructure spheral statistics. The foundation of spheral statistics is the basic matrix of spheral indices of PIOT 4x4 in size:

P1 + P2 + P3 + P4

I1 + I2 + I3 + I4

O1 + O2 + O3 + O4

T1 + T2 + T3 + T4

On its basis, an almost infinite system of derivatives detailed fractal matrices of another dimension is constructed according to a simple algorithm: 4х4n, where n is a series of natural numbers in modifications from +1, or from –1, or others. This matrix system is created o­n the alphanumeric indices of PIOT resource elements, called spheral indices. The algorithm of the infinite series of spheral matrices is the same: each row of any matrix turns into a column of the underlying matrix, and each row indicator appears in the underlying matrix as the sum of four indices expressing the complex of resources necessary and sufficient for its reproduction/autopoiesis.

The fractal spheral matrices are described by mathematical statistics and fractal mathematics by Benoit Mandelbrot (1982), in which "a fractal is a structure consisting of parts that are in some sense similar to the whole" expressing the ancient principle: "all in all." The social structures of 20 spheral clusters/elements, as well as the matrices of their spheral indices are fractal, which makes holistic CYBS and its spheral tetranet thinking by fractal, subjected to the corresponding laws of fractal/statistic mathematics.

The system of infinite spheral/fractal matrices creates a logically unified network statistical space of humanity, the global mathematical digital language of which is able to integrate, compose and decompose according to the PIOT indices all the diversity of national statistics, overcoming their innate fragmentation, discontinuity and disharmony. Spheral statistics creates an adequate empirical basis for CYBS and opens the way for the fundamentally innovative “Spheral Information and Statistical Technology/Digitalization” (SIST) of all spheres at all levels. The use of CYBS together with its SIST provides effective global harmonious governance of spherons in accordance with their values ​​and priorities at all their levels.

In the framework of a single spheral statistics, its center is the statistics of spherons. Since each spheral element/cluster is associated with o­ne or another part of spherons and doesn’t exist without them acting as their actors, all of them (20) at any level can be expressed through spheral indices of spherons, through the quantity and quality of their employment, through its cost/time disclosed in the theory of spheral surplus cost of spherons, etc.

5. The CYBS as a Single Megascience of Humanity for its Spheral Third Way in the XXI Century. Spherons as observable, observing and self-governing systems are the connecting center of cybernetics of all three of its orders, making third-order cybernetics of spheres/spherons their conscious and self-organizing beginning for its previous orders. Therefore, spherons are the center of the CYBS entire integral system as MegaScience of the 21st century (below).

The CYBS spherons make cybernetics, its “mechanisms of communication and control in [social] systems, with… circular, feedback, or self-referential processes” (Heylighen, 2020) extremely universal/complex, maximally holistic/large-scale and global science - MegaScience, covering the whole complex of observable and observing systems (first and second order), coinciding with humanity, since the spherons exhaust and embrace it.

The universal attributive/cognitive advantages of the spheral interpretation of complexity/wholeness in CYBS allow it to become a scientific, theoretical and methodological platform for combining all the countless social and humanitarian subdisciplines into a single holistic social Megascience of the XXI century. It provides a unified scientific solution to all global problems of humanity, ensuring its survival and liberation from all systemic crises of its integrity created by traditional, partial thinking, ignoring wholeness that is cognitively inaccessible to it.

CYBS is the connecting center of Megascience of the XXI century, providing a breakthrough in the humanity scientific knowledge, consciousness and thinking to a fundamentally new, substantial level of spheres/spherons genetic reality. The CYBS spheres/spherons unite all branches and all industry groups of the population; therefore, it becomes a unified platform for all industry disciplines of human cognition. All branch (social and natural) sciences in o­ne way or another relate to and study a person and various partial groups/communities of people, which are all parts of universal spherons, whose cybernetics is studied by CYBS. It creates a unique historical opportunity to integrate all knowledge in hundreds of its modifications into a single scientific organism Megascience of the XXI century.

CYBS provides full and holistic interdisciplinary cooperation and the synergy of traditional sciences through bridges of spheres/spherons, overcoming their discontinuity and raising them to a “substantially new” (Einstein) level of thinking unknown to them until now.

CYBS as Megascience will be a unique breakthrough of human knowledge in the XXI century that will free global society from all the problems that threaten its existence. But in this Megascience, the priorities of scientific knowledge are differently distributed than in the past. The cognitive priority in it is occupied by the social and human sciences, not in their traditionally stagnant and marginalized state but in the “substantially new” spheral state that they receive in CYBS. Their priority in relation to the natural and technical sciences allows them to control the quality of their use/influence both o­n society/humanity itself and o­n its spheral ecology. Their priority is realized by the brilliant Socrates testament of the cognitive priority of humanity, which has not yet been realized: “Know thyself,” which is achieved o­nly with the discovery of spherons and the emergence o­n their basis of CYBS.

Similar Megascience excludes any existence of military science (of course, not immediately but from the moment of complete disarmament) designed to destroy people. But all useful military achievements for the peaceful life of humanity, of course, are preserved and integrated in the CYBS technical sciences complex.

6. The True Level/‘Stature’ of Cybernetics: The Hidden Spheres/Spherons Science. Fifty years ago (1972), the famous German philosopher Gotthard Gunter predicted the scientific perspective of Cybernetics: it "will o­nly attain its true stature if it recognises itself as the science that reaches out for that which is hidden." Cybernetics reached this level of true fundamental science in the CYBS, third-order Cybernetics of spheres/spherons, which (CYBS) reveals this “hidden”, genetic, societal, unknown to humankind “substance” (Einstein) of Cybernetics. This substance raises Cybernetics to the “true stature [level/height of fundamental] science” (Gunther) of spheres/spherons. Nothing other than the hidden, global spheres/spherons of humanity, truly/fundamentally scientific in Cyberneticsdoes not exist. Therefore, o­nly through them can Cybernetics in the Cyberspheronics face become the truly holistic, “transdisciplinary and metadisciplinary” (Scott, 2019) MegaScience of the new century.

The CYBS as the unified/holistic, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary MegaScience reveals the true, fundamental genetic depth and hidden secret of humanity o­n Earth. The human/humanity has not yet known it as Socrates bequeathed, but humankind has already been opened to it by GHA’s intellectual efforts during 15 years and is presented in the first form, far from perfect, in our Spherons CYBS Manifesto.

7. Humanity Spheral Third Way (STW) of the XXI Century and its Definition in CYBS.

7.1. General characteristic. The Third Way as political thinking and movement originated in the last century and is represented by a wide range of ideological and party trends from fascist to liberal, the analysis of which is devoted to many works (Giddens, 1998; Third Way, 1999; Fedotova, 2002; Greaney, 2016; and a lot others.). The Third Way is an attempt to find more effective methods and ways of responding to the new challenges of humanity, to which the traditional ideologies of capitalism/liberalism and communism/Marxism are powerless to answer due to their obsolescence and worthlessness.

The Third Way of Cyberspheronics is the “SPHERAL Third Way” (STW), an alternative from its traditional variants—European, American, and Russian—which we will combine with the concept of “Traditional Third Way” (TTW). Comparison of TTW and STW by basic attributes/qualities, free from unnecessary details, can be presented in the following table, which expresses their 22 key differences and the STW advantages.


Traditional Third Way (TTW)


Attitude towards holistic humanity

Partial, reduced and fragmented o­n branches/corporations/nations; inadequate, deadly

Integral by holistic equal spheres/spherons that are exhaustive to humanity; adequate, viable

Human/humanity rights

Do not guarantee the fundamental right: the right to life, security and the absence of war/violence

Ensures the right to life, the absence of war/violence and all others rights and freedoms

World history, its vision

Total class struggle and eternal national wars of annihilation, capture and domination. Partiality/partons history

Harmony/peace/nonviolence and partnership of equal spherons. In their world history war/violence is o­nly pathology of partiality/partons

World Order

Unipolar, monistic, subjugating the world to economic/military leader diktat, to systemic violence of its military political blocs

Multipolar, pluralistic, subordinate to balance/harmony/nonviolence of humanity equal spherons and their partnership, hostile blocks free

Real priority

Economy, material wealth, financial capital, military-industrial complex

Social sphere, people, social capital, ecology, health, education, welfare of the population


Fragmented weak science devoid whole knowledge. Propaganda instead of science. Ideology priority. Refusal from global peace science. Concealment, closed truth. “Lie/false is God."

Holistic scientific path through the MegaScience of spheres/spherons. No propaganda, o­nly science. Global peace science - Cyberspheronics priority. Openness of truth. “Truth is God”: Gandhi

Peace education/literacy

Partial, unscientific, pacifist, sporadic, lacking in foundations of

Global Peace Science (CYBS)

Holistic, free from the impotence of pacifism, universal o­n the fundamental basis of the Global Peace Science (CYBS)

Social equality

Impotence in the theory and practice of equality, leading to the growth of inequality constantly.

Lack of scientifically recognized fundamental societal identity of equality

Scientific theory of equality in all dimensions based o­n the equality of spheres/spherons. Recognition of the scientific fundamental societal identity of the equality of people in spherons

Social contract of society as a whole and at each level

It is absent that is the cause of permanent group spontaneous conflicts, riots, hostility, violence and chaos.Lack of solidarity, diktat of all forms selfishness: individual, group, nation, etc.

It is present as a contract - Constitution of harmonious spherons providing a peaceful, conscious and preventive solution to any conflicts.Universal solidarity, the priority of altruism, empathy and compassion

Global peace

The complete inability to build peace that brought humanity to the nuclear eco-/geno-cide grave edge.

Refusal from Peace Department

The full ability to build global peace o­n equality and harmony of spheres/spherons. Peace Department priority in a democracy


Total powerlessness in the theory and practice of non-violence: ultimate tool for conflict: violence

Full ability to ensure non-violence based o­n peace, equality and harmony of spheres/spherons


The question is not posed,arms race and militarism absolutization; nuclear disarmament is rejected

Harmonious disarmament in 50 years: transformation of national armies into a global peace/ecology corps; nuclear disarmament: the nearest 10 years


Unfair, in the interests of international corporations

Fair, spheral, in the interests of all spherons/humanity as a whole


Partial democracy, in the oligarchic part interests. Population participation in elections: 25-35%, in decisions - 1-5%.

Systemic pathologies: inequality, militarism, corruption, nationalism, racism, decline, nature destruction

Complete, in the interests of all spherons. Population participation in elections: 75>%, in decisions – to 50%.

Long-term global overcoming of all systemic traditional


The structure of political power and strategic governance

Chaotic, spontaneous, sectoral, fragmented, different at different levels, subjective, subordinate to the ruling particular elite interests; short-term governance, within 5 years, no more

Systemic, integral, spheral at all levels, conscious, objective, subordinate to the interests of spherons, society as a whole; long-term governance up to 100 years, harmonized with short-term o­ne

Law supremacy

Partial, limited laws of the ruling elites/partons in the interests of their power, but pathological for society as a whole

Holistic, spheral laws of spherons in the interests of society as a whole, taking into account the interests of all its parts in their harmony

Democratic Constitution

Of the partial dominant elites, their inequality and violence

Of the holistic and equal spherons, their peace, harmony, nonviolence


Virtually absent except for particulars

Spheral mathematical statistics, universal

Digitalization (innovation)

Weak, limited, partial, technical and surface

Strong, versatile and deep in spheral statistics - digital breakthrough

Pluralism and monism;
Integrity and partial

Antagonistic monism and close to it devoid of measure traditional pluralism exclude integrity/holism, produce different types of the partial and its pathologies

Spheral, structural, four-dimensional pluralism admits, defines and produce viable integrity/holism, excluding the pathology of monism and the partial

The Future

“Sunset of Humanity”, “The End of History”, “The West Collapse”, “The USA Fall”, etc.

The prosperity of humanity, the beginning of its mature history


Qualitative social stagnation amid rapid technological progress, social obesity

Qualitative social breakthrough along with prosperity in all progress vectors

7.2. The STW Spheral Attributes. TTW does not know the spheral structure of the population, its spheral employment and spheral social production, and is deprived of its science, although it sometimes uses the spheral terminology intuitively. STW, built o­n the fundamental science of CYBS, creates its consciousness o­n spheres/spherons, starting with the priority social sphere.

1. The STW Sociosphere. The basis of a civilized, open, fair and democratic society of the 21st century is equality, peace, non-violence and harmony of the spherons at all its levels, ensuring and guaranteeing human rights/freedoms, starting from the right to life and including the absence of war/violence and militarism at all levels society and power. The social priority is children and the harmonious development of the individual instead of the economy and militarism. Priority development of social infrastructure is housing, ecology, education, healthcare, sports, recreation, etc.

2. The STW Infosphere. The innovative priority of MegaScience of Cyberspheronics and its universal information technology is spheral statistics, spheral internet, spheral digitalization as a digital breakthrough, spheral artificial intelligence, spheral applications, etc.

3. The STW Orgsphere. Spheral democracy is a quota equality of elected representatives (including gender equality) of spherons for all governmental bodies at all levels; the combination of representative and participatory democracy; children's suffrage, executed by parents, to ensure social completeness and the participatory nature of democracy; and spheral decentralization of power.

4. The STW Technosphere/Economics. Spheral harmonious market, regulated by the STW priorities, is included in the priority of the sociosphere and ecology, along with the priority of average prosperity.

Capitalism and communism are alternative pathologies of the last century, as equally militaristic, disharmonious and deadly for humanity as extreme obesity and extreme exhaustion. The TTW does not constitute and is not viable. The o­nly fundamental alternative is offered o­nly by STW of CYBS in a holistic, non-violent, socio-economic system of human spheres/spherons. The CYBS is a holistic scientific and harmonious worldview of the spherons STW, alternative to all unscientific, antagonistic militaristic ideologies of the past.

8. The CYBS Holistic System of Values​/Human Rights. It is determined by the societal role, qualities and priorities of the spherons, which provide all the conditions for the survival and stability of society/humanity. It includes the following humanistic values​/rights: life, love, peace, harmony, non-violence, truth, freedom, equality, fraternity, law, complete/truth democracy and happiness. This axiological system integrates humanistic human values​/rights that are verified by long historical experience and excludes the opposite, anti-humanistic values ​​practiced by violent and totalitarian empires: death, hatred, war, disharmony, violence, lies, slavery, inequality, enmity, arbitrariness, dictatorship, misfortune and its vicious derivatives. They created systemic social pathologies that eventually, from the inside, destroyed and denied their empires, proving their non-viability, incompatibility with the values ​​of life-supporting spherons and unacceptability for an integral society/humanity.

The spherons axiological system is based o­n the priority right of human/humanity to life/peace, excluding war/militarism, as detailed in the relevant GHA Declaration (Semashko, 2017).

9. Spherons: Social Priorities Hierarchy/Network. Spherons/people have the highest priority of wholeness as o­nly this societal resource creates/produces all of them (PIOT), including itself, i.e. all societal integrity in its entirety and complexity. Spherons fully determine the existence/autopoiesis of society/humanity, but they can o­nly do this through other spheral resources created by them. Therefore, the absence of any of them makes the existence of benevolent society/humanity impossible, therefore they are equally necessary for it. Therefore, spherons are equal in power, in the possession, use and governance of all spheral and natural resources.

This is the spherons highest law of organizational/managerial equality, which ensures/determines the social equality of other forms and begins to consciously act in society o­nly with its scientific knowledge in the CYBS and with its constitutional fixation at all levels of democratic power. It provides a quota equal distribution of all power equally among elected representatives of spherons.

The spherons priority determines among people the priority of children, the quality of which determines the quality of society as a whole, including the highest quality of attitude toward the older generation, who gave birth, raised and reared grateful children. Their priority is ensured by the “Children's Suffrage Executed by Parents” (Semashko, 2004).

The spherons priority determines the full gender equality and partnership (Eisler, 1994), the full gender balance of power as the most optimal condition for social autopoiesis in general and its governance at all levels.

All of these societal priorities determine and create all the real conditions for the first humanistic holistic priority of the comprehensive and harmonious development of each individual. This was proclaimed, but never achieved in the past as a result of the dominance of other priorities: inequality, violence, power, profit, etc.This is the whole hierarchy/network of the spherons social priorities.

10. The Ineradicable Vice of Traditional Governance/Authority/Democracy. In all centuries and millennia, it has always been built o­n the dominance/priority of o­ne or another of the most powerful (economic, political, spiritual or social) parts of society over its whole. This key/structural flaw of partial control gives rise to all its other fundamental and irremovable flaws in history: inequality of all kinds, violence, militarism, corruption, selfishness of all forms and injustice. Such partial/egoistic control/power was successful, at best, o­nly in solving partial problems, but it remained ineffective/destructive with respect to the whole and inevitably led it to death along with its dominant partial power. Global problems created by partial power/administration, including any democracy, are insoluble for TTW, which was noted by Einstein 70 years ago (below) and proved the unsuccessful historical experience of solving these problems. The most striking example of the last century is the powerlessness of democracy in regard to nuclear weapons, the race of which it generously finances; o­nly accelerating the approach of humanity to the global genocide/ecocide, reducing the probability of its survival to a minimum, to 100 seconds (Mecklin, 2020). The traditional governance of the ruling political systems is aimed at strengthening the interests of o­ne of its parts (class, party, elite, etc.) to the detriment and expense of the whole interests. It mistakenly defines this part as the generative principle of the whole, which deforms it and leads it to inevitable death.

11. The Cyberspheronics (CYBS) Mission: Holistic/Spheral Democracy for the Spheral Third Way. The CYBS first social need and mission is to reorganize the democratic way of self-government in the interests of society as a whole at all levels from local to global, in order to ensure its survival/sustainability by eliminating the root vice of traditional power. This mission is achieved by an equal quota distribution of power of all branches and organs between the elected representatives of the four spherons in their gender balance.

Cyberspheronics is the necessary holistic scientific thinking/consciousness/knowledge of spherons, transforming them from a spontaneous, unconscious “actor in o­neself” into a conscious, scientifically minded democratic “actor for o­neself”, expressing by Kant terms. Therefore, spherons and Cyberspheronics are inseparable from each other in their true mutual necessity/sufficiency as a necessary, integral actor/subject and its integral consciousness/thinking. CYBS is the scientific strategy of STW of the 21st century, acceptable to all peoples in their quest for peace, harmony, non-violence and prosperity.

Cyberspheronics is not “EGO thinking/governance” of a selfish/partial nation, party or person, leading to self-destruction of humanity/noosphere, but “ECO thinking/governance” of its survival and prosperity o­n Earth. This is its mission.

12. The CYBS History. Cyberspheronics (CYBS) has come a long and complex evolutionary path, starting in 1992 with the first fundamental book Spheral Approach (Semashko), devoted to spheres/spherons (societal groups of the population engaged in the spheres of social production/autopoiesis, where they are also called the traditional term "spheral classes") and their spheral statistics. Its next step was Tetrasociology, which received the support of RC51 Sociocybernetics (Semashko, 2002; Scott, 2002).

CYBS develops and enriches the initial fundamental ideas of the cybernetics founders: Norbert Wiener, William Ashby, Heinz Foerster, David Stuart, Gregory Bateson, Warren McCulloch, Gordon Pask, Robert Park, Stafford Beer, Umberto Maturana and many others. These ideas received a new incentive for development and special significance in the works o­n Sociocybernetics, concentrated in the corresponding Research Committee (PC51) of the ISA, since its establishment in 1998, as well as in international cybernetics societies, which is reflected in the historical works of Bernard Scott (1983 – 2019).

The stratum/trend of cybernetic knowledge is organically integrated into CYBS with the trend of macro-sociological generalization and development of the four-spheral structure of social production as a whole (autopoiesis according to Maturana) in theoretical sociology. It starts with the early Marx, Danilevsky, Kovalevsky, Gandhi, Sorokin, Braudel, Parsons, Toffler, Bourdieu, including Semashko’s books for 30 years, starting with Spheral Approach (1992) and ending with Gandhica (2019) and many other sociologists.

The concept of “Third Order Sociocybernetics” of spheres and spherons was first introduced with the participation of Bernard Scott in the GHA collective book “The ABC of Harmony” (2012).

13. The CYBS as a “substantially new manner of thinking” according to Einstein. The CYBS conception/paradigm implements the Albert Einstein great testament more than 70 years ago for the humanity survival, which has not been fulfilled so far. He wrote: “The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.” Therefore, "we shall require a substantially new [holistic and nonviolent, asymmetric] manner of thinking if mankind is to survive." Unfortunately, over 70 years, humanity was unable to find, define and practically use “substantially new thinking” for its survival.

Einstein admitted the possibility of “a world government” o­nly based o­n such “substantially new thinking” but not o­n the basis of traditional, torn, partial and militaristic thinking that deprives humanity of survival, unity and solidarity. The CYBS thinking of wholeness/complexity by categorical duplexes of spheres/spherons in structural matrix modeling can be called the 21st century cognitive Copernican revolution and a breakthrough from the intellectual impasse of past centuries.

14. The CYBS as the thinking of Gandhian "greatest force of non-violence of mankind." The CYBS theory continues and develops at a new scientific level the greatest discovery and practice of Mahatma Gandhi’s non-violence through the use of his “Newtonian law of the greatest force of mankind non-violence” in his varnas/spherons. Gandhi, analyzing “the whole gamut of man's activities … [as] an indivisible whole”, wrote that it represents the indivisible unity of four equally necessary and sufficient spheres of society: “social, economic, political and purely religious”. They are occupied by equally necessary and sufficient groups of the population – Varnas, which subsequently received the name "spherons" by their employment in the spheres of society. “All [four] varnas [spherons] are equal, for the community depends no less o­n o­ne than o­n another,” therefore they are equally necessary and sufficient together, determining the systems wholeness of every society.

Varna is not a human invention, but an immutable law of nature—the statement of [genetic] tendency that is ever present and at work like Newton's law of gravitation. Just as the law of gravitation existed even before it was discovered, so did the law of varna… Varna, thus conceived, is no manmade institution but the law of life universally governing the human family.Fulfillment of the law would make life livable, would spread peace and content, end all clashes and conflicts, [and] put an end to starvation and pauperization… The idea of superiority or inferiority is wholly repugnant to it [varna]. ThoughthelawofvarnaisaspecialdiscoveryofsomeHinduseer,ithas universal application... Varna has nothing to do with caste. Down with the monster of caste that masquerades in the guise of varna… That is how I look at the law of varna. The world may ignore it today but it will have to accept it in the time to come. It ordains that everyone shall fulfill the law of o­ne's being... Today, nations are living in ignorance and breach of that law [of varnas’ equality] and they are suffering for it. The so-called civilized nations have by no means reached a state [of varnas development], which they can at all regard with equanimity… Without the abolition of the caste hierarchy, there can be no peace in society and the world ... When we revive universal human equality [of varnas/spherons]... When that day comes we shall have peace o­n earth and goodwill to men.” (Gandhi, 140-183).

14.1. The CYBS: Synergy of the Holistic Potentials of Gandhi, Wiener, Einstein, Maturana, Vernadsky and Kelso Based o­n Spherons. A brief theoretical outline of CYBS illustrates the fundamental, deep synergy, which is based o­n spherons and the holistic intellectual potentials of the last century geniuses, each of which laid the foundation for a certain, necessary and self-sufficient scientific integrity/holism for each of the four societal spheres.

Gandhi is the foundation of the first definition of the societal integrity/wholeness of non-violence for people/humanity.

Wiener is credited with the first definition of universal governing circular integrity/wholeness, including the governance/organization of a human society.

Einstein is the creator of the first definition of “a substantially new,” cognitive integrity/wholeness of thinking/information of people.

Maturana gives the first fundamental definition of autopoiesis (self-production), common to the entire biosphere, including society, where it acts as a conscious social production, i.e. societal autopoiesis.

Vernadsky relates to the first definition of the noospheral social integrity/being of humanity as a special, geological/material force and anthropospheral infrastructure o­n planet Earth.

Kelso gives the first definition of the universal holism of the “binary economy”, which complements the societal equality of Gandhi's spherons with “equality of economic opportunities through ownership of capital” (Kelso, 1968), which he implemented in the “Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP)” with direct and reverse ownership. The economic holism of Kelso/Kurland ensures the prevention and peaceful harmonious resolution of all economic conflicts, opening the "Just Third Way" of socio-economic development and converging with the Gandhian economy of "love, equality, justice and non-violence" of the spherons.

CYBS, o­n the basis of statistically and empirically proven spherons, the intuition of which is present in all the named geniuses of the last century, in the potential of each, synergistically integrates/synthesizes all the fundamental potentials of the integrity of the last century. o­n their synergy, CYBS forms the science of a fundamentally new, holistic, integral, meta-, trans- and inter-disciplinary class of the XXI century: MegaScience (above). They are synergized o­nly o­n the basis of spherons and o­nly within the framework of Cyberspheronics as the highest level of organizational/governing cybernetics. CYBS provides them with synergistic, cognitive/praxiological integration/holism in MegaScience pragmatics (below). CYBS stands o­n the shoulders of these intellectual giants, ensuring the highest scientific fundamentality and integrity of its MegaScience, constructing and constituting it o­n their fundamentality, ensuring the non-violent achievement of all the goals of global peace and the eradication of all wars/militarism.

15. The CYBS Social Need. Its acuteness is set, o­n the o­ne hand, by the high level of globalization of all spheres of world social production, which determines the decisive role of its integrity and global governance of it; and, o­n the other hand, by the systemic impotence of traditional partial social science, torn into hundreds of industry disciplines, to solve global integrity problems. This systemic weakness is demonstrated by the entire crisis situation associated with the COVID-19 pandemic at all levels: global, regional - the destruction/crisis of the EU solidarity, national - the crisis of separate countries, especially the USA, etc.

The CYBS offers a constructive alternative to systemic national impotence by its systemic “greatest force of non-violence” of humanity spherons (Gandhi), self-organized in their spheral structures of global governance, the first project of which for the UN was created in the GHA in 2017 (Semashko). The priority development of this alternative at the international level fully meets the constantly exacerbating social needs of humanity inherent in CYBS, which today does not have any other scientific competitive alternatives.

CYBS creates and provides in the XXI century “cybernetic consciousness as a new noospheric phenomenon of the global information space” (Tonkonogov, 2018).

16. The CYBS Dual, Peaceful/Military Use. In the transition period, until the completion of complete and general disarmament, there remains a dangerous possibility of militaristic use of the CYBS by o­ne or another country or group of countries in order to achieve world domination by non-violent means. Any fundamental science, as we know, has a dual, peaceful/military purpose. CYBS is no exception from this danger.

17. International Monitoring of the CYBS MegaScience Development/Use. There can be two effective and compatible/complementary ways to control the CYBS development/use and, thus, preventing its militaristic use in the "national egoistic interests" of the most powerful countries or their blocks, as was the case, for example, with atomic energy in 1945 and subsequent years.

17.1. The creation of a single “Global Academy of CYBS MegaScience” (GACM) with regional and national branches under the auspices of the UN/UNESCO or the International Bank and the IMF, capable to finance the CYBS MegaScience project and exercising international control over it. The GACM will be an excellent example of international scientific and humanitarian cooperation.

17.2. The establishment within the framework of world civil society of the “International Association of Cyberspheronics” (IAC), uniting, o­n the o­ne hand, international associations of scientists, primarily in cybernetics, such as the American Society for Cybernetics (ASC, 1964), World Organization for Systems and Cybernetics (WOSC, 1969), ISA Sociocybernetics (RC51, 1998), The International Academy for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences (IASCYS, 2016), and others such as that; and, o­n the other, the leading peacemaking organizations ICAN, NAPF, IPRA, IPPNW, UN2020 and the like. They are able to effectively continue the initial international development of CYBS, which was carried out in the GHA for 15 years, and better and faster than others to assess the scientific and humanitarian value of CYBS, because they are aimed not at the military, but at the peaceful development of cybernetic science and humanity. The wider CYBS will be involved in international scientific and public control, the less will be the chances of its militaristic and destructive use.

18. The CYBS Projects National Experimental Verification. The international bodies of GACM and IAC will ensure wide international verification of each CYBS project in the specific conditions of separate countries and regions as well as in the respective national universities and academies of sciences. This will facilitate integration of the CYBS projects into separate countries and will raise the level of each national science to the highest level of global Cyberspheronics MegaScience. To this goal, these bodies create in different countries a network of the CYBS International Research Centers/Laboratories (IRCLs), which will provide scientific and social experimental testing of CYBS projects, especially those previously created by the GHA with their necessary modernization.

19. The CYBS Manifesto: Humanity True Self-knowledge Beginning. The CYBS Manifesto is a manifesto of the scientific worldview/consciousness of the humanity spherons, i.e. humanity as a whole. Humanity did not know such self-awareness yet. Only in its cybernetic form did human consciousness find its adequate, holistic expression. This became possible o­nly at the beginning of the XXI century; it did not work out before. Therefore, the CYBS/Spherons Manifesto is o­nly the first, modest, and far-from-perfect beginning of the scientific self-consciousness of humanity. It will inevitably expand, correct, deepen and develop in all directions throughout the subsequent evolution/history of human/humanity, as long as it exists. The human self-knowledge, whose priority was bequeathed by Socrates more than 2000 years ago, in the Cyberspheronics true fullness and depth of the spheral societal genetics of its spherons, begins in the XXI century, more than four thousand years after it.

20. The CYBS Truth Three Simple Conditions/Steps. For more than 40 years of CYBS’s difficult development, CYBS has accumulated vast experience in verification and individual conviction in its truth, which is integrated in three simple actions/steps available to every literate person, especially to every open-minded, honest and true scientist.

First step. Carefully read the integral and integral/crowning book of CYBS Gandhica (2019), created within the GHA by 82 coauthors from 25 countries based o­n numerous scientific researches and publications over the past 40 years. Recall that the proposed CYBS Manifesto is nothing more than the multidimensional focus of Gandhica and its quintessence.

Second step. Write a review of this book with an assessment of its scientific, methodological, social and political significance for humanity and the development of its knowledge, which becomes most vivid in comparison with the traditional paradigms of classical and post-non-classical science. This review, which is publicly available, will be a measure of the intelligence, depth and quality of the CYBS and will increase the understanding of each reviewer.

Third step. Complete a Statistical Scientific Research of Spherons (SSRS) of any city, institution, region, country according to the example of their statistical studies of 76 countries in Gandhica and the choice of available statistics for any period of time, for example, for the past year: 2019, 2018, 2017, etc. o­nly through an individual, independent SSRS is intellectual possession of the societal substance/reality of sociogenetic cybernetic spherons possible.

Over the decades of SSRS in the GHA and before, CYBS’s methodology/technique was found and tested and simplified. It is presented in the book Gandhica, in Chapter 1, in three small paragraphs: 1.4.2., 1.4.3., and 1.4.4., o­n 5 pages: 32-37 (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848). Any SSRS using this technique, resulting in 8 spheral indices per half page in the elementary statistical table, will require, as experience has shown, no more than 4 hours from its executor. Moreover, half of this time will take mastery of the technique and search for statistics o­n the Internet. You can compare and add your table to the tables of spherons of other countries and cities in Gandhica. Then these tables can be collected and published in a special book, “The CYBS Statistics,” which can be produced annually both at the UN global level and at the national level. These statistics will demonstrate the dynamics of global and national spherons as the primary empirical basis for all other cybernetic studies. Similar SSRS will be massively accessible, starting with 5th grade students, when its methodology becomes a smartphones application (see below) and will ensure universal cyber literacy in CYBS in the XXI century. The professional cyberneticians can and should start/launch this necessary and inevitable literacy. Without knowledge of spherons through SSRS, there can be no Cyberspheronics as MegaScience; there can be no “substantially new manner of thinking”; there can be no mastery of the “greatest force of non-violence”; there cannot be implementation of CYBS in any practical project.

VI. Cyberspheronics Pragmatics.

The Best Global Security is Global Peace

1. The CYBS Pragmatics/Praxeology and its Economic Efficiency. The CYBS pragmatics always accompanied its theory from the very beginning, more than 40 years ago, starting with its first practice at the Demiurge student club in 1976-1980. The CYBS highest practical goal is to ensure humanity’s survival and save the noosphere from the global ecocide/genocide in the XXI century. We can name at least six fundamental innovations of CYBS, which will ensure the achievement of this pragmatic goal based o­n its spheral statistics and technology.

1.1. The development of spheral statistics and CYBS technology will require the creation of new research centers and laboratories in each country with millions of new, highly intellectual jobs and the corresponding innovative information infrastructure. National and international statistical agencies are the most prosperous and interested institutions in the development of spheral statistics.

1.2. CYBS and its digital technologies will ensure the creation of a spheral Internet, which will put the traditional Internet under control, overcoming its spontaneity, fragmentation, destructiveness and other well-known limitations and vices thereof.

1.3. CYBS and its digital technologies will provide a development trend for a new, spheral artificial intelligence (SAI), which integrates the achievements of traditional AI and provides control over its further development to exclude any threats to humanity’s survival.

1.4. CYBS and its digital technologies will provide a theoretical and information platform for a new, non-violent democracy that excludes war, violence, militarism and the arms race. This democracy will be able to establish itself, with appropriate mass enlightenment/education and strategic global governance training, over the next 50 years or by the end of the XXI century, as the GHA studies have shown (GPS, 2016; Gandhica, 2019; etc.).

1.5. CYBS and its digital technologies show the o­nly cardinal way to solve the global environmental problem: overcoming global warming and establishing a harmonious and sustainable spheral balance between nature and humanity through control and global governance of interactions between their spheres.

1.6. CYBS and its digital technologies open up the production of an almost unlimited class of applications for individual smartphones of two key varieties. A) For planning/managing the spheral resources of individual autopoiesis within the different periods of its life time space, starting, from the age of 10, with a view to the most promising and successful personal growth, and harmonious development. B) For leaders of any rank and organization of any scale for individual design, comparison and selection of the most optimal development strategies for these organizations through the harmonization of their spheres/spherons. Any similar application for an individual smartphone is a pocket-sized artificial intelligence (PAI) device of the highest level as an indispensable tool for any thinking individual who cares about the most effective development of both his own personality and the organization he or she leads. The PAI will ensure the interaction of AI and humans at all levels of a cybernetic society (Tonkonogov, 2018).

The PAI applications along with other CYBS pragmatics create a new market of CYBS digital spheral technologies, unlimited in time, demand and variety, which will endlessly pay for any starting investments in them.

These and many other CYBS innovations, private and derivative from them, provide a breakthrough for business and global governance in this direction to a qualitatively different level of business/pragmatic, social and economic efficiency.

2. The CYBS Projects Total Number. For more than 40 years of CYBS, there have been about 300 industry and regional projects in all spheres and at different levels. These projects started since the spherons structure was first tested in the student club of harmonious development "Demiurge" in 1976 – 1980 (Semashko, 2017). The projects were first politically tested in the “Spheral Democracy Faction” in the St. Petersburg first democratic Parliament, “Petrosoviet”, in 1992 – 1993 (Semashko, 2010). The lists of similar projects are published in many GHA books listed in the bibliography. A complete list of the projects will be published in the GHA 10th book in this year end.

3. The Most Ambitious and Fundamental CYBS Project: “The UN Harmony Spheral Model”. This project was created by the GHA in 2017 to participate in the projects contest of the Swedish “Global Governance Foundation”. “The UN Harmony Spherons Structure” (Semashko, 2017), presented below, summarizes this project. This model assumes that each United Nations state-member has 8 national emissaries in the UN (in gender balance by 2 representatives from each of the four national spheres), which would amount to 1,600 members of its General Assembly for 200 UN state-members. It could democratically fulfill the functions of “a world government” (Einstein), providing global peace from spherons harmony at all levels from municipal to global.

The type of this model creates at all governing levels and in all structural units of both a sectoral/branch and regional nature the spheral structures. Examples of many of them are presented in the list of CYBS projects.

4. Holistic MegaScience: Full Social Responsibility. Through holistic Cyberspheronics/Megascience, for the first time in history, humanity will receive such scientific knowledge that it will be able to take and bear full scientific social responsibility for the quality of all autopoietic structures and processes of humankind/noosphere, ensuring its survival and prosperity for all people. In contrast to the rupture of traditional scientific knowledge/thinking in hundreds of partial “subdisciplines” devoid of a unifying cybernetic platform of spheres/spherons, whose social responsibility was practically zero for 75 years, when the threat of a global nuclear ecocide/genocide arose, CYBS for the first time opens such an opportunity of world/universal responsibility for all of humanity. This is the natural way for the evolution of social responsibility from its current partial/fragmentary forms to its fullness and integrity with CYBS. The historical path of evolution of social responsibility is considered in detail in the writings of Matjaž Mulej (2016, 2019 and others) and his Institute for Social Responsibility. The full social responsibility basis is a holistic knowledge of the spheres/spherons that exhaust humanity/noosphere. Without their knowledge, all liability is flawed and limited.

5. Holistic Cybernetic Megascience: Global Democratic Federation and World Government Foundation. The long and difficult way to search for a democratic federal structure of both multinational countries and the Earth global democratic federation, devoid of a fundamental scientific abutment in the past, becomes fulfilled in the spheres/spherons of Cyberspheronics as a holistic Megascience of humanity. The conscious organization of the social life and political power of each people/nation and humanity as a whole o­n the basis of spheres/spherons of the appropriate scale, level and cultural-historical diversity, disclosed in the CYBS, creates a fundamentally substantiated single platform for the Earth global democratic federation at all levels from municipal to world, as confirmed by holistic cybernetic science. At the same time, the CYBS becomes a fundamental scientific pillar of the world government (Einstein), the world parliament and the Earth’s Constitution. CYBS also becomes a fundamentally new peacemaking tool than can save humanity of all sorts of wars, according to the UN and its corresponding Security Council and its Charter (Kotila, 2016 and others; Martin , 2018, etc.). The spherons equality is the social foundation/law of scientific federalism and its Constitution, without which they (democracy, federalism and their constitutions) remain shaky and unstable, from within which fascist and other totalitarian regimes easily arise, as history has shown many times.

6. Holistic Cybernetic MegaScience as a Common Scientific Platform for the Integration of Various Environmental Projects. There are many disparate subdisciplinary environmental projects that receive in CYBS the necessary scientific substantiation and integration with other projects. This fully applies to Pawlik’s original project “Fungi Future - Biosphere Rescue Plan” (2020).

7. Spherons Manifesto as the Manifesto of the Norm Replacing the Humanity Pathologies. Humanity/society, as a social organism of the highest complexity, has its own norm and pathologies. Their knowledge requires fundamental science, to which humanity has not yet matured and is o­nly entering its first stage creating it in the MegaScience of Cyberspheronics. CYBS, penetrating into the spherons’ genetic level of humanity, offers fundamental scientific knowledge of the social norms of love, harmony, peace and non-violence. o­nly this genetic societal norm provides humanity with continuous reproduction, uninterrupted life, survival and prosperity. The spherons in love, harmony, non-violence and peace constitute the o­nly internal source of their being, with all its infinite historical, cultural and civilizational diversity. Spherons are the source of human health and beneficial norms.

The source of social pathologies/diseases of humankind, whether mild or severe, are deviations from the norm. These deviations have occurred at various historical stages among various, historical transient parts/partons of humanity: nations, classes, groups, parties, elites, states, etc. They give rise to certain social pathologies that often reach extreme ugliness. They are different in duration, severity, acuity and depth of flow: nationalism, chauvinism, fascism, racism, anarchism, Marxism, liberalism, fundamentalism, bureaucracy, vandalism, imperialism, militarism, exceptionalism, destructivism (of all forms and types), terrorism, misanthropism, sadism, selfishness, radicalism, alcoholism and the like. The scientific atlas/encyclopedia of social pathologies has not yet been compiled due to the lack of science, but CYBS creates the basis for it, both as a whole for humanity and in its spheres/spherons, as well as in different historical eras. This is a matter for the future.

It is important to emphasize that different forces can use knowledge of social pathological anatomy for different purposes: to cure any social organism, to kill it as soon as possible, or to exacerbate pathology. Humanity has no fewer pathologies than the human organism, but o­nly CYBS approaches resolution of those pathologies through scientific, systemic and holistic knowledge.

8. Summary. The CYBS Manifesto: The Manifesto of Humanity Spherons Third Way, Outside of Capitalism/Communism. Cyberspheronics (CYBS) finds in the equal, structurally eternal and universal spheres/spherons of humanity its deepest societal genetic nature of its wholeness. Cyberspheronics provides humanity and the planet with survival in the framework of a harmoniously organized spheral social autopoiesis, subject to the laws of sustainable ecology. Cyberspheronics frees humanity from the global nuclear ecocide/genocide. We discuss this issue in detail and with the necessary justification in Gandhica (Conclusion).

Therefore, the CYBS Manifesto is the Manifesto of humanity’s survival, its holistic harmonious worldview, alternative to all partial, monistic and destructive ideologies of the past. This is Manifesto of the genetically equal spherons and their conscious/scientific, “substantially newThird Way to the era of peace, love, harmony and non-violence. The science of self-knowledge of humanity is finally reached the values of this era, following in the footsteps of Gandhi.

The CYBS Manifesto is an alternative to all past Manifestos of violence, including communism and liberalisms (Oxford, 1997). In place of various architectures/dictatorships of the deadly parts of humanity of different colors (white, black, red, green, rainbow, etc.), the CYBS Manifesto creates a fundamental scientific architecture/democracy of non-violence by equally necessary and sufficient spheres/spherons of humanity/noosphere as a whole. The CYBS guarantees humanity equality, justice, peace, love, brotherhood, freedom, non-violence and happiness of all peoples in their harmony while also retaining all constructive achievements of the past.

No matter how brutal the resistance of the dominant parts of any color is, the victory of the new world order architecture, based o­n the foundation of a holistic cybernetic MegaScience of spheres/spherons, is inevitable in the 21st century. Mahatma Gandhi first predicted non-violent victory almost a century ago. Therefore, the CYBS Manifesto is the Gandhian Manifesto of the Future and its New Generations. It is the spherons’ Manifesto of love, harmony, peace and non-violence for an evolving mature reasonable humanity.

VII. ICAN/GHA Epilogue. Citizens of the Earth!

We, the ICAN/GHA, propose the Anti-Nuclear Manifesto for the salvation of humanity from the all-consuming suicidal/genocidal nuclear fire, first tested 75 years ago o­n peace civilians in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, 250 thousand of whom were easily alive burned in it.

For 75 years, nuclear weapons, through the efforts of the traditional human reason, have been brought to such a degree of suicidal/genocidal perfection that now they are capable to burn all of humanity together with the planet easily and quickly, with a supersonic speed of their delivery to any planet point and to any corner of our common at home.

The traditional mind for 75 years was o­nly able to burn itself, but was powerless to save and preserve itself. Einstein understood and expressed this then, demanding "a substantially new manner of thinking if humanity wants to survive." For 75 years it has become clear that with traditional thinking humanity cannot survive. With it, humanity can o­nly burn itself, starting since Hiroshima/Nagasaki.

Even earlier, Gandhi found a way of thinking of the "greatest force of non-violence" by the spheres/spherons of humanity, which "is mightier than the mightiest [nuclear] weapon of destruction." But for traditional thinking was not 75 years enough to recognize and master the salutary, "substantially new thinking" by the spheres/spherons, which are the o­nly o­nes that possess soft nuclear energy of the "greatest force of non-violence" within humanity. It is inaccessible to traditional thinking.

Citizens of the Earth!

The conclusion of our Manifesto is simple. If you/we want to survive by eliminating suicidal/genocidal all-consuming nuclear fire, you must rise to a "substantially new manner of thinking" by the Gandhian spheres/spherons. It was first systematically developed in the innovative cyber science Cyberspheronics in our Manifesto, as a result of intellectual searches and work for many decades. A new, spheral way of thinking in it compressed in synergy of the cognitive laws highest intellectual achievements of the humanity greatest geniuses: Gandhi, Einstein, Wiener and others o­n 40 pages. Its semantic space for the humanity survival is enclosed between its two centers/poles of synergy: the Nobel Appeal, which sets the strategic goals of survival, and the system of cognitive laws of Cyberspheronics that ensure their achievement in a new paradigm of thinking. There is no other paradigm of it.

Therefore, there is no other modus of survival and other way out of the suicidal/genocidal nuclear deadlock in us, in humanity, except for a substantially new manner of thinking by the spheres/spherons of our Manifesto. It was created by 25 co-authors from 14 countries and is based o­n hundreds of the co-authors’ works of previous years ... (It is in the attachment, 40 pages and is published o­n the website along with all responses: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908).

This is where our survival and salvation lies. To do this, we all need to understand, study, recognize and together, in solidarity and partnership, without confrontation, develop, improve and practically apply this saving manner of thinking.

This is our conclusion and call to forever exclude any possibility of a repetition of the horrific tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki through 75 years!

Yours sincerely,

Beatrice Fihn,

ICAN Executive Director, Sweden,

ICAN is Nobel Peace Laureate 2017,


Email: admin@icanw.org

Leo Semashko*, PhD,

Philosopher, sociologist, cybernetician, peacemaker, GHA Founder and Honorary President,

The ISA RC51 Sociocybernetics Honourary Lifetime Member,

Initiator and Editor-in-Chief of the "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto",

Blog: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253

Email: leo.semashko@gmail.com

Skype: leo.semahko

Phone home: 7-812-597-6571


* The cybernetic ideas presented in this Manifesto and Gandhica grew up in close cooperation and friendship with Bernard Scott, a well-known British cybernetics for the past 20 years, including 15 years in the GHA (Global Harmony Association: International peacemaking organization of scholars-humanities, established in 2005: https://peacefromharmony.org). His fundamental ideas are important intellectual contribution to this Manifesto. The main milestones of our cooperation over 20 years are presented o­n the GHA website. I cannot forget their and am happy to express to him my highest appreciation and gratitude. Leo Semashko. May 31, 2020.



Appendix 1.


Professor Evgeny Chazov, Academician, IPPNW Co-President,

from the 1985 Nobel Lecture

Tragedy and Triumph of Reason”:




Cicero: “Each man can err, but o­nly fools persist in their errors”. … A lot of people are still under a delusion, consciously or involuntarily, as regards the significance of the arms race and its proliferation to outer space. However, as Cicero put it, “Each man can err, but o­nly fools persist in their errors” [regarding nuclear weapons] ....

(After Hiroshima and Nagasaki), Prompted by the sense of responsibility for the fortunes of the human race, Einstein addressed the following warning to his colleagues: “Since we, scientists, face the tragic lot of further increasing the murderous effectiveness of the means of destruction, it is our most solemn and noble duty to prevent the use of these weapons for the cruel ends they were designed to achieve”.

Unfortunately, this appeal, like the warnings voiced by many leading scientists, has not reached the public conscience or the conscience of political and state figures. Nuclear arsenals o­n our planet have been increasing with every year, with every day…

Put forward by some state and military figures, the theory of preserving peace through “deterrence” led to the situation where nuclear might transcended the limits of human perception. Indeed, no o­ne in this audience can really imagine o­ne million Hiroshimas

Over a million and a quarter physicians have signed the Amsterdam congress appeal against the nuclear arms race. We suggested the inclusion in the Hippocratic Oath a commitment to fight against the danger of a nuclear war (such an amendment has already been officially made to the Soviet physicians’ oath)…

IPPNW is aware of the fact that wars start not from bombs dropped or shots fired – they start in the minds of people and are the result of political decisions. That is why our congresses regularly address world leaders, particularly of the USSR and the USA, calling upon them to do the utmost to exclude the very possibility of a nuclear war and to reverse the nuclear arms race…

Our intellect cannot be reconciled with the situation when the world is heading toward nuclear death. We physicians are neither politicians, nor military experts. However, we have analyzed the present uneasy situation thoroughly enough to suggest to governments our medical prescription for the survival of humankind. Our program has been elaborated, discussed and approved by IPPNW Congresses. It envisages a ban o­n tests of nuclear weapons and, as the initial step, a moratorium o­n nuclear explosions; a nuclear weapons freeze and the subsequent reduction and eventual liquidation of nuclear weapons; the non-proliferation of the arms race to outer space, no first use of nuclear weapons and the creation of an atmosphere of trust and cooperation.

It is not a political declaration of either communists or capitalists – it is what is demanded by reason, by people the world over who want to live.

Any reasonable man finds it hard to believe that while hunger, diseases, social inequality, economic underdevelopment and illiteracy are in existence, hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted to feed the insatiable monster – the arms race…

What we need is cooperation, not confrontation ... (What is not today, what is destroyed – L.S.)…

The Nobel Prize awarded to our movement is not o­nly a recognition of physicians’ services in denouncing the nuclear illusions and promoting a true perception of nuclear weapons and effects of their use, but also a symbol of international trust and belief in the infinite value and uniqueness of the human mind…

Nuclear war, unless it is prevented, would lead to the extinction of life o­n Earth and possibly in the Universe. Can we take such a risk?...

Today we face a seriously ill humanity, torn apart by distrust and fear of nuclear war. To save it we must arouse the conscience of the world’s peoples, cultivate hatred for nuclear weapons, repudiate egoism and chauvinism, and create favorable atmosphere of trust. In the nuclear age, we are all interdependent. The Earth is our o­nly common home, which we cannot abandon. The new suicidal situation calls for the new thinking. We must convince those who take political decisions.


Leo Semashko Comment.

Everything that is said in this lecture is the absolute truth today, in 35 years! Now, in 35 years, will there be scientists, academicians and politicians in Russia (especially) who can support, raise to a new scientific level of thinking and continue the saving humanistic absolute truth of academician Yevgeny Chazov?

Similar great ideas by Professor Bernard Lown, the US Co-President of IPPNW are presented in the theses of Professor Ernesto Kahan, former Vice President of IPPNW in the Manifesto above.

All absolute truths and great humanistic ideas of Academician Yevgeny Chazov find continuation and development at the level of new, spheral (by spheres/spherons) thinking of the "Anti-Nuclear Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto", which compressed the GHA fundamental scientific discoveries and peacemaking achievements for more than 15 years of work of its international humanitarian team from nearly 60 countries.

This Manifesto offers a fundamental scientific model of "Global Security/Peace" that "to exclude the very possibility of a nuclear [and any] war and…arms race" and provides a societal, scientific, non-violent cure for "seriously ill humanity." This Manifesto expresses that "Our intellect cannot be reconciled with the situation when the world is heading toward nuclear death." It reveals the key global reasons for the preservation and buildup of genocidal nuclear weapons for 75 years:

- Pathological politics of global confrontation,

- The military-industrial complex, which designs, improves and manufactures nuclear weapons,

- Traditional democracy, with priority and generous funding for it with military budgets.

Our Manifesto shows non-violent, intelligent ways to overcome these causes for the benefit of all peoples in our century. We call o­n all scientists, politicians, public and religious figures of goodwill and reason to support this Peace Manifesto as a reasonable recipe for survival in our century, and to make self the possible intellectual and/or organizational contribution to it. Maybe it, finally, will convince those who take political decisions.

The Nobel lectures by Evgeny Chazov and Bernard Lown are an extremely important, especially for Russia, but not o­nly, addition to the argumentation and justification of our "Anti-Nuclear Peace/Cybersferonics Manifesto".


Appendix 2.


Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki!

Ban all Nuclear Weapons Beginning with the United States!


Hiroshima after the US atomic bombing


On August 6, 1945 and again o­n August 9, 1945 the United States dropped atomic bombs o­n the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The stated reason for this first and still o­nly use of atomic weapons was the need to hasten the end of World War II.

But Japan was devastated by months of the bombing of its cities, and numerous defeats at the hands of the United States military. Japan finally surrendered unconditionally when the Soviet Union declared war o­n the empire of Japan and briefly invaded Japanese held Manchuria. The instant incineration of 250,000 people and the additional tens of thousands more who died subsequently from associated wounds, radiation poisoning and radiation-induced cancers was primarily a warning to the Soviet Union whose war time marriage of convenience with the United States was about to end. [read more]http://nepajac.org/nonukes.htm



Almond G. (1990) A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. 1990. SAGE Publications.

Almond G., Verba S. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press.

Anonymous. “Cybernetics is a false science.” 2019 (In Russian) To whom? For what? https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=842

Ashby, W. An Introduction to Cybernetics. – London: Chapman and Hall, 1956.

Ashford R. (1996) Louis Kelso's Binary Economy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1996.

Avery J. (2017) Nuclear Weapons: An Absolute Evil: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=800

Avery J. (2018) A World Federation: http://eacpe.org/app/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/A-World-Federation-by-John-Scales-Avery.pdf

Avery J., Semashko L. and others (2017) Thermodynamics and Negentropy of Spheral Classes Societal Harmony: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=756.

Azcona M. C. (2005) Peace, Literature and Art-UNESCO EOLSS Encyclopedia: https://www.eolss.net/ebooklib/bookinfo/peace-literature-art.aspx

Azcona M. C. (2014) About Peace and Peacemaking. Cook Communications, USA: https://www.amazon.es/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3AMaria+Cristina+Azcona+%28Ed+%29.&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1

Azcona M. C. (2016) Strategies for Peace. Cook Communications, USA:https://www.amazon.com/Strategies-Peace-Bruce-Cristina-Azcona/dp/1365188310

Baimuratov U. (2015) Manifesto of Harmonious Consciousness. Crises, Cataclysms and Conflicts: How to Overcome theDestructive Synergy of Three «C»(New redaction).//Socrates Almanac, OXFORD. – p. 304-306.

Bateson, G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Paladin, New York, NY, 1972.

Berndt, H.; Scott, B.; Semashko, L. Tetrasociology and sociocybernetics: towards a comparison of the key concepts, 2003. – Pp. 222–232. – https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/2-2_eng.pdf.

Blechman B.M. (1985) Preventing Nuclear War: A Realistic Approach.

Boyle F. (2013) The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence. Clarity Press

Brennan J. Against Democracy, 2016. press.princeton.edu.

Caldicott H. (2020) HIROSHIMA: The Lessons We Haven't Learned: 75 Years After The US Atomic Bombings of Japan, We Remain Perched o­n The Precipice of Unparalleled Catastrophe: https://portside.org/2020-08-07/hiroshima-lessons-we-havent-learned

Chappell P. (2012) PEACEFUL REVOLUTION: How We Can Create the Future Needed for Humanity’s Survival. Easton Studio Press: https://paulkchappell.com/peaceful-revolution/

Covey, Stephen R. (2011). The 3rd Alternative. New York: Free Press

Crequie G. (2020) Le Messager De La Paix: https://editions-du-cordeau.com/index.php?id_product=49&id_product_attribute=0&rewrite=le-messager-de-la-paix&controller=product

Durkheim, E. The Division of Labour in Society, 1996.

Ecimovic, T. SPHERONS’ Argumentation: Detailed Review, 2017. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=747.

Ecimovic, T.; Avery, J.; Semashko, L. THE CLIMATE CHANGE SYSTEM 2017. Ed. 2017. – https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/ECIMOVIC_CLIMATE%20CHANGE_18-04-17_Final.pdf.

Einstein, A. o­n Peace and Gandhi, in Richard B. Gregg, Profiles in Gandhi. – P. 100.

Einstein, A. Quotes, 1955. – https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins104567.html.

Eisler R. (1994) The Chalice and The Blade. Harper Collins San Francisco: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=932

Fedotova V. G. “European Third Way” and Its Symbolic Significance for Russia and Other Countries. Sociological Review Volume 2. No 1. 2002 (In Russian): https://sociologica.hse.ru/data/2011/03/30/1211856451/2_1_1.pdf

Fihn B., Thurlow S. (2017) International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). – Nobel Lecture:https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2017/ican/26041-international-campaign-to-abolish-nuclear-weapons-ican-nobel-lecture-2017/

Foerster, H. Understanding understanding. New York, NY: Springer Verlag, 2003.

Foerster, H.; Broecker, M. Teil der Welt. Fraktale einer Ethik. Ein Drama in drei Akten, Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag, 2002.

Foerster, H.; Freund, S. Heinz von Foerster. Cyber-Ethics: A Portrait, 1992.

Galtung, J. A Theory of Conflict: Overcoming Direct Violence. TRANSCEND University Press, 2010.

Galtung, J. Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research, 1990. – Vol. 27, 3.

Gandhi M. (1946) My Life Is My Message. H, 1-6, p.172: www.mkgandhi.org/momgandhi/chap94.htm

Gandhi M. (1982) o­n Nuclear Arms: https://www.mkgandhi.org/articles/NuclearArms.htm

Gandhi M. (1998) Mine & Metal Workers, Gandhi Jayanti 1998: https://www.mkgandhi.org/articles/constr_prog.htm

Gandhi M. (2014) My life is my message. Compiled by: Krishna Kripalani. Printed Navajivan, Ahmedabad: https://www.mkgandhi.org/ebks/ownwords.pdf

Gandhi, M. My Religion, 1955: http://gandhisevagramashram.org/pdf-books/my-religion.pdf

Giddens A. The Third Way: the Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: PolityPress, 1998.

Greaney M., Kurland N. (2016) Pope Francis and the Just Third Way: Global Peace from Harmony: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=414

Gunther, G. (1972). Cognition and Volition: A Contribution to the Theory of Subjectivity. In Collected Works of the Biological Computer Laboratory (University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois). Peoria, IL: Illinois Blueprint Corporation: http://www.vordenker.de/ggphilosophy/c_and_v.pdf

Guterres A. (2018) Secretary-General's Press Conference at Nagasaki Peace Memorial Hall: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/press-encounter/2018-08-09/secretary-generals-press-conference-nagasaki-peace-memorial

Guterres A. (2020) 75th Anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Time to end the nuclear menace: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/articles/2020-08-06/75th-anniversary-of-the-atomic-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-time-end-the-nuclear-menace

Heylighen F. & Lenartowicz M. (2020) Cybernetics. (Preprint, to be published in: Ritzer G. & Rojek C. (eds.) (2021) Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (2nd. edition, Wiley-Blackwell Science publishers)

Heylighen F. and Joslyn C. Cybernetics and Second-Order Cybernetics. In: R.A. Meyers (ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science & Technology (3rd ed.), Academic Press, New York, 2001: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/Cybernetics-EPST.pdf

Kaznacheev, Vail (2014) The era of technocratism is over. What's next? // Noosphere. Society. Person.: http://noocivil.esrae.ru/236-1256

Kelso L. and Adler M. (1958) The Capitalist Manifesto. Random House, New York;

Kelso L. and Kelso P. (1968) Equality of Economic Opportunity Through Capital Ownership,… Doubleday & Co., New York;

Kotila R. (2016) World Federalists Seek Leadership from the European Union for a New UN: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=680

Krasnov V. (2019) Mahatma Gandhi and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Two Giants Who Blessed the 20th Century. Will Vladimir Putin, Other World Leaders Listen?: https://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=884

Kurland N. (1982) The Capital Homestead Act: www.cesj.org

Kurland N., Brohawn D., Greaney M. (2014) The Just Third Way. How We Can Create Green Growth, Widespread Prosperity and Global Peace: Center for Economic and Social Justice; www.cesj.org

Kurland N., Michael D. Greaney M. and others (2012) CESJ. OUR CORE VALUES. OUR CODE OF ETHICS: http://www.cesj.org

Lee, S. P. (2018). Minimizing the Danger of Nuclear Weapons. In Cook, B. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Research o­n Examining Global Peacemaking in the Digital Age (pp. 45-50). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3032-9.ch004

Lepskiy V.E. Philosophical-Methodological Basis for the Formation of Third-Order Cybernetics. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2018;(10):7-36. (In Russ.) https://www.phisci.info/jour/article/view/2359/2612

Lepskiy V.E., Zadorozhnyuk I.E., & Pirozhkova S.V. (2018) Search Vector – Third-Order Cybernetics (Review of the International Interdisciplinary Scientific and Practical Symposium). Voprosy Filosofii. 2018. No. 6, pp. 208– 211 (in Russian): http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2002&Itemid=52

Lown B., Chazov Y. (1985) IPPNW Nobel Peace Prize Lecture: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1985/physicians-facts.html ; https://ru.citaty.net/tsitaty/1924964-bernard-lown-we-physicians-protest-the-outrage-of-holding-the-e/

Luhmann, N. Introduction to Systems Theory. –M.: Publishing House “Logos”, 2007.

Maguire M., Avery J., Semashko L. (2018) US-Russia Summit. The Great Peace Charter XXI: https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-russia-summit-a-manifesto-and-roadmap-of-global-peacebuilding-in-the-21st-century/5647028

Mandelbrot, B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1982.

Martin, G. (2018). Global Democracy and Human Self-Transcendence: The Power of the Future for Planetary Transformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.

Maturana, H. Neurophysiology of cognition, in Garvin, P. (Ed.), Cognition: A Multiple View. – Spartan Books, New York, NY, 1970. Pp. 3–23.

Maturana, H., Varela, F. Autopoiesis and Cognition, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980.

Maturana, H., Varela, F. Autopoiesis: the organization of the living, 1973// Maturana H., Varela F. Autopoiesis and Cognition.– Boston, 1980. – P. 63–134.

McCulloch, W. A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets, 1945. – Pp. 89–93.

McCulloch, W. Embodiments of Mind. – Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1965.

McMurtry, J. U.S. Holds the World Record of Killings of Innocent Civilians, 2013. – http://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-holds-the-world-record-of-killings-innocent-civilians/5393789.

Mecklin J. (2020) Closer than ever: It is 100 seconds to midnight. 2020 Doomsday Clock Statement: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=924

Mulej M. (2016) Social responsibility as a Precondition for Peace and Development Instead of the Current Global Socio-economic Crisis: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=473

Mulej M. (2019) Gandhian Democracy. Full Social and Peace Responsibility of Society: Innovation, Utopia and Systemic Behavior: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=473

Neumann, J. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. – New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Onoprienko V. (2014) Vernadsky-Kaznacheev Nekrosphere: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=845

Oxford Manifesto 1997. The Liberal Agenda for the 21st Century: The Liberal Manifesto, 1997, Oxford, UK: https://web.archive.org/web/20110207012341/http://www.liberal-international.org/editorial.asp?ia_id=537

Paetau, M. Niklas Luhmann and Cybernetics. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 2013. – Vol 11, No ½. – https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/rc51-jos/article/view/790.

Parsons, T. “The Present Status of ‘Structural-Functional’ Theory in Sociology”, Social Systems and The Evolution of Action Theory, New York: The Free Press, 1975.

Parsons, T. American Society: A Theory of Societal Community. – Paradigm Publishers, 2007.

Parsons, T. The Present Status of ‘Structural-Functional’ Theory in Sociology. Social systems and the evolution of action theory, New York: Free Press, 1977. – P. 100–117.

Pask, G. A cybernetic model for some types of learning and mentation. In Cybernetic Problems in Bionics, Oestreicher, H.C. and Moore, D.R., (Eds.), Gordon and Breach, 1968. – Pp. 531–585.

Pask, G. Conversation, Cognition and Learning. – Elsevier, Amsterdam and NY, 1975.

Pawlik L. (2020) Fungi Future - Biosphere Rescue Plan: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=887

Pawlik, L. Hack or Die: How Humanity Steers Into Its Post-Digital Future. World Futures, 2019. –p. 58–68. –: http://www.academia.edu/Documents/in/Heinz_von_Foerster.

Piaget, J. Psychology and Epistemology. – Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middx, 1977.

Pias, C. Cybernetics – Kybernetik (The Macy-Conferences 1946–1953). 2vols. Zurich & Berlin: Diaphanes, 2004.

Poincare, H. The Foundation of Science. The Science Press. New York And Garrison, N.Y., 2013. – https://archive.org/stream/foundationsscie.

Poincare, H. The Foundations of Science, 1913. – https://archive.org/stream/foundationsscie01poingoog#page/n224/mode/2up/search/201+page.

Poincare, H. The Value of Science. New York: Dover, 1958.

Ronfeldt, D. and Arquilla, J. (2020) Whose Story Wins: The Noösphere, Noöpolitik, And the Future of Statecraft: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339040249

Rush B. (1984) A Plan of a Peace Office for the United States. Massachusetts Review

Scott B. (2019).In Defence of Pure Cybernetics. Cybernetics and H/K. Vol. 26 (2019), no. 4, pp. 99-110: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=946

Scott, B. Cybernetic foundations for Psychology. Constructivist Foundations, 2016. – 11(3) – pp. 509–517.

Scott, B. Education for cybernetic enlightenment. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 2011. – 21(1-2) – PP. 199–205.

Scott, B. Explorations in Second-Order Cybernetics: Reflections o­n Cybernetics, Psychology and Education. – Edition echoraum, Vienna, 2011.

Scott, B. Human systems, communication and educational psychology, educ. Psychol. in Practice, 1987. – 3, 2 – pp. 4–15.

Scott, B. Morality and the cybernetics of moral development. Int. Cybernetics Newsletter, 1983p. 520–530. Reprinted as chapter 5 in Scott, 2011.

Scott, B. O­n Becoming a Cybernetician: Highlights and Milestones. World Futures, 2019. – 0: 1–12. – https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/bZGfNBIUVcCTsW2HSyv3/full?target=10.1080/02604027.2019.1591082

Scott, B. Second order cybernetics: an historical introduction, Kybernetes, 2004. – 33, 9/10 – pp. 1365–1378.

Scott, B. Second-order cybernetics as cognitive methodology, Systems Research, 1996. – 13, 3 – pp. 393–406.

Scott, B. Sociocybernetic Reflections o­n the Human Condition. ISA Forum Vienna, 2016 – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=742.

Scott, B. Sociocybernetic understandings of consciousness, 2017. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=742.

Scott, B. Some thought about Leo Semashko’s concept of ‘spherons’: ISA RC51 o­n Sociocybernetics. Newsletter 34, September 2017. – https://sociocybernetics.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/rc51-newsletter-34.pdf .

Scott, B. Tetrasociology. Editor's Introduction, 2002. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=147.

Scott, B. The cybernetics of Gordon Pask, in Gordon Pask, Philosopher Mechanic: An Introduction to the Cybernetician’s Cybernetician, R. Glanville and K.H. Müller (eds.). – Edition echoraum, WISDOM, Vienna, 2007. – Pp. 29–52.

Scott, B. The role of Sociocybernetics in understanding world futures, Kybernetes, 2009. – 38, 6, pp. 867–882: – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=741.

Scott, B. Using the logic of life to reduce the complexity of life. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 2012. –19, 3 – pp. 93–104.

Scott, B. Working with Gordon: developing and applying Conversation Theory (1968–1978), Systems Research, 1993. – 10, 3 – pp. 167–182.

Semashko L. (2004) Manifesto of Spheral Democracy (In Russian):https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=392

Semashko L. (2010) “Spheral Democracy Group” in Petrosoviet 1992: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=58

Semashko L. (2010) “Spheral Democracy Group” in St-Petersburg Parliament 1992: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=58

Semashko L. (2017) Philosophy and Dialectics of Spherons: From “Demiurge” (1976-1980) to the UN: https://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=305

Semashko L. (Ed. 2020) GHA 77th Project. The World Civil Society Security Council (WCSSC): https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=941

Semashko L., Baimuratov U., et al. (2017) Manifesto of the Noosphere Spherons (In Russian): https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=711

Semashko L., DeWitt M. (2004) Children’s Suffrage: Democracy for the 21st Century:https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=211

Semashko L., Siebert R. (2017) Spherons of Harmony: The Third Way of Religions Reconciliation: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=782

SemashkoL..; Авери, Дж.; Афанасьева, В.; Экимович, Т. Термодинамика и негэнтропия социетальной гармонии сферных классов: термодинамика глобального мира, 2017 – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=728.

Semashko, L. and 119 coauthors from 34 countries. Harmonious Civilization: 2009: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=379.

Semashko, L. and 174 coauthors from 34 countries. Global Peace Science, 2016. – https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf

Semashko, L. and GHA 20 coauthors. Network Spherons: The UN of Harmony and Global Peace Replacing the UN of Disharmony, 2017 – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=769.

Semashko, L. and others. SPHERONS’ Argumentation: Advantages and Disadvantages, 2017. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=747.

Semashko, L. and the GHA 32 coauthors from 13 countries. Message to BRICS and other Peaceful States Leaders, 2015. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=632.

Semashko, L. and the GHA 75 coauthors from 26 countries. The ABC of Harmony for World Peace, Harmonious Civilization and Tetranet Thinking, 2012. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478.

Semashko, L. Deep Social Structure of SPHERONS’ Harmony: Copernican Revolution of Sociology in the XXI Century, 2017. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=726 ;

Semashko, L. Human/Humanity Right to Life, Global Peace and Social Harmony. GHA Declaration 2017: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=798.

Semashko, L. Sociology for Pragmatists. Textbook for the university students. Part 1, St.-Petersburg, 1999. – 376 p. (in Russian). – https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/sociologiya-dlya-pragmatikov.pdf.

Semashko, L. Spheral Approach. – St-Petersburg, Notabene, 1992. – https://peacefromharmony.org/file/5162/1992-semashko-sferniy_podhod.pdf.

Semashko, L. Spherons’ Sociocybernetic MegaScience, 2018. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=810.

Semashko, L. Tetrasociology: from Sociological Imagination through Dialogue to Universal Values and Harmony, with 14 co-authors, in three languages. St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 2003, 394p.http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=149

Semashko, L. Tetrasociology: Responses to Challenges. – St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 2002. – https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/2-1_eng.pdf.

Semashko, L. The ABC of Harmony as Sociocybernetics of the Third Order, 2012. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=64.

Semashko, L. The Software Product Person (SPP) for Harmonious Development and Personal Growth. Information Technology, 2015. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=600.

Semashko, L.; Chandra, S. Key to Global Peace Science…: Global Peace Science. Peace science: First Common Good and Human Right, Revolution of Social Sciences, 2015. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=624.

Semashko, L.; Chandra, S.; Pereira, T. The USA Hiroshima: Nuclear Threat to Humanity. GHA Message, 2015. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=630.

Semashko, L.; Kashina, O. Global Peace Genetics: Structural Harmony of Russia’s Spherons in their Statistics for 2010, 1996 и 1991. Edition 2018. – https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=836.

Semashko, L.; Semashko, A. Psychological Human Genome: Global Peace from Individual Harmony / Global Peace Science, 2015. – P. 232–234. – https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf .

Siebert R. (2020) The Third Way: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=945

Spencer-Brown, G. The Laws of Form. London: Allen and Unwin, 1969.

Stojanović, G. R. (2018). The Role of Education in Reducing the Threat of Nuclear War. In Cook, B. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Research o­n Examining Global Peacemaking in the Digital Age (pp. 30-44). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3032-9.ch003

The Third Way: Progressive Governance for the 21st Century // The White House.25 April 1999.

The U.N. Treaty o­n the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 2017: https://www.icanw.org/the_treaty

Tonkonogov A. Cybernetic Consciousness as a Social Phenomenon of the XXI Century. Law and Right. No. 9. 2019. P. 23-27 (In Russian): https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kiberneticheskoe-soznanie-kak-sotsialnyy-fenomen-xxi-veka/viewer.

Tonkonogov A. Cybernetic Society as a Reality of the 21st Century // Law and Right. No. 9. 2018. P. 23-27 (In Russian):https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kiberneticheskoe-obschestvo-kak-realnost-xxi-veka/viewer

Umpleby, S. Heinz von Foerster and the Mansfield Amendment. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 2003. – 10 (3–4) – pp. 161–163.

Valtsev S. Democracy. The Humanity Sunset. 2018: https://wowavostok.livejournal.com/9651668.html

Valtsev S. Why is democracy impossible? The Humanity Sunset. 2016: http://rusmissia.ru/ch-iii-byt-ili-ne-byt/glava-ii-politicheskaya-sistema/2-ob-odnom-ustojchivom-mife/pochemu-demokratiya-nevozmozhna.html

Vernadsky V. (1931) Biosphere and Noosphere: http://www.rulit.me/books/biosfera-i-noosfera-read-412871-126.html (and: https://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=705)

Vernadsky, Vladimir, “The Biosphere and the Noösphere,” American Scientist, Vol. 33, No. 1, January 1945, pp. 1-12: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27826043

Von Foerster, H. o­n self-organising systems and their environments, in Self-Organising Systems, M. C. Yovits and S. Cameron (Eds.), London: Pergamon Press, 1960. – PP. 30–50.

Von Foerster, H. Understanding Understanding: Essays o­n Cybernetics and Cognition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.

Von Foerster, H., et al. (Eds), Cybernetics of Cybernetics, BCL Report 73.38, Biological Computer Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1974.

Von Foerster, H., Mead, M. and Teuber, H.L. Editors’ Introduction to Cybernetics: Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems, Josiah Macy, Jr Foundation, New York, NY, 1953.

Vygotsky, L. Thought and language. – MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1962.

Weizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason. From Judgement to Calculation. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1976.

Wiener N. The human use of human beings. Cybernetics and Society. London, Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1954

Wiener, N. Cybernetics. Camb. Mass: MIT Press, 1948.

Wiki. Criticism of democracy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_democracy

Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. – Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1953.

WOSC. Philosophical-methodological basis of third-order cybernetics. 2020: https://wosc2020.ipu.ru/



Letters, responses, discussions

Final layout of the book "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto"

Dear GHA and ICAN members, friends,

I am happy to announce that today we have completed the full layout of the book "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" (72 pages) in the attachment, which is published in PDF o­n the website here:


Now our unique, cybernetic, intellectually excluding nuclear weapons in "a substantially new manner of thinking" (Einstein) by the Gandhian spherons book for the UN General Assembly is fully ready for publication.

Each of its co-authors has the right to publish it in own country, translate it into native language and promote it to own government with the initiative to support and ratify the UN Treaty o­n the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (https://www.icanw.org/the_treaty), which was initiated by ICAN in 2017 and is now ratified by 48 countries. (Did your country ratified it?) This will be our not o­nly decisive intellectual contribution, but also a powerful practical contribution to the prohibition of genocidal nuclear weapons that are totally deadly for humanity and the planet. In Russian, with portraits of Russian-speaking co-authors, this book will be published later.

We, the GHA and ICAN, express our deep heartfelt gratitude to all co-authors of the "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" from 21 countries for your ingenious anti-nuclear ideas, which, in cybernetic synergy with the ingenious thinkers of the last century, created an irrefutable intellectual anti-nuclear potential for the new Era of Gandhian Nonviolence, which will inevitably win and destroy nuclear weapons in the coming years, leaving it no chance.

Special thanks to Mr. Ivan Ivanov for the excellent design of the book entire visual range and to Mr. Alexander Konanchuk for its brilliant layout, which crowned our almost 4-month work o­n it. I am taking holidays until September 21st.

Best wishes to all peace from harmony o­n our nuclear-free planet,

Dr. Leo Semashko, GHA Founder and Honorary President,


Друзья, дорогой друг Лео:

Большое дело сделано соединением усилий наших энергией нашего глубокоуважаемого организатора и учёного мирового уровня - Лео Семашко, в столь практичном документе как «Антиядерный Манифест»! Основная цель публичного документа - войти в пространство НООСФЕРЫ мягко и гармонично с эволюцией глобального общества. Эта задача выполнена.

Практические действия по продвижению нашего Антиядерного Манифеста в каждой (или в группе) стране пойдёт тактически разными путями, и это понятно. В РФ такое действо произвёл Лео Семашко своим посланием Манифеста в адрес В.В.Путина. Этот акт зафиксирован и на нашем канале с рабочим названием канала - Народный Автономный университет РА. Ближе к Новому году постараемся осуществить дополнительные меры по продвижению нашего Манифеста. А пока- всех благ, и гармонии в окружающей нас Ноосфере!

С теплом,

Владимир Оноприенко.

Ссылка на видео:

В.В.Путину от Льва Семашко - «Антиядерный

Манифест» #СССР#правда#nagasaki#hiroshima#

Манифест Путину. Почему в «стране возможностей» не используются прорывные интеллектуальные ресурсы? Готов ли российский интеллект к фундаментальному прорыву 21 века в Эру Ненасилия? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiZllEQGwuQ&list=PLaj-pfgh0HK9aw7zmFzEiLB7za2bxeJxl&index=8&t=54s




This week I will send my donation

Ernesto Kahan,



Dear Leo:

Excellent work. Thank you.

My donation comes this week.

Keep safe.

Best wishes for a good vacation.

Your Rudi from the House of Mir,

Prof. Rudolf Siebert,



Congrats Leo Semashko and all the GHA for this new achievement.
Is not easy to lead a group of intellectuals in the same direction and you Leo, have been organizing us through your direction.
Thank you in the name of all our partners.
Lic. María Cristina Azcona
GHA Vicepresident,

Dear Leo

Glad you got donation for our “Antinuclear Manifesto”.

These 600 dollars made up as follows. 100 dollars from me and 500 from Peace people www.peacepeople.com.

The comment you quote is by my friend Gerry Grehan as he was having difficulty in getting payment to you and asked me to see if I could get message to you and check donation got to you.

You may wish to send email to Gerry Grehan chairperson peace people and thank for five hundred

dollars. Peace,

Mairead, Grehan



Dear Mairead and Gerry,

Thank you very much again for your generous donation as a sign of your appreciation for our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto.

Best wishes for your health, love and peace,




Dear Leo,
Once more you made real your vision  by leading  of our great family of GHA,
for the Global Peace and Harmony via this MANIFESTO.
We all together  continue our efforts with love and unity and harmony.
May mercy God save you and all members of GHA.
With peace and harmony
Takis D Ioannides
Cofounder and VP of GHA,

Dear Leo,

Good but Atomic weapons become smaller, BC weapons bigger.

Peace and Love,

Johan Galtung,




Dear Leo,

Today I send by Western Union, my donation of 200 US$ for the “Anti-Nuclear Manifesto", which is great!!! In the present circumstances, this amount is enormous for me.

Your code to claim is: MTCN: 6274104843.

Please communicate me when you received the money.

Ernesto Kahan


Dear Ernesto,

I am very, very grateful to you for your generous donation, which I received just today, 11 days later. The fact is that at that time we were o­n vacation in the Crimea with wife, where I did not have a computer to receive and send emails. We returned to St. Petersburg just today, and I immediately received your money with great gratitude for your strong moral and financial support of our «Anti-Nuclear Manifesto». o­nce again, many thanks to you, we greatly appreciate your strong support.

We are looking forward to Spanish Gandhica to prepare you a colorful collage for your 80th anniversary from the covers of all the GHA books, in which you are a coauthor and a strong supporter. What with it? What are its perspectives? o­nly a little over a month remained before it. Please, try to publish it in o­ne form or another before December. Is it possible for you? Many thanks.
With love and best wishes of health to you, friendly,


Дорогой Лев!

Да ещё Михайлович! Храбрый, как лев африканский, и умный как русский медведь, к тому же миролюбивый! Так вот я послал сегодня на новый счёт Веры 25 тыс. Прошу подтвердить получение.

Прилагаю мой последний вестник бюллетень RAGAAntidote 57:


А ссылку внизу не присылал?

«Сердце будет пламенем палимо. От Николая Гумилёва к Александру Солженицыну».

Рубрика в газете: Полифония смыслов, № 2020 / 19, 21.05.2020, автор: Владислав КРАСНОВ: https://litrossia.ru/item/serdce-budet-plamenem-palimo/

Привет Вере. Спасибо за морковный рецепт для глаз! Отдыхайте на всю катушку!


W George Krasnow (http://wiki-org.ru/wiki/Краснов,_Владислав_Георгиевич)

President, RAGA, www.raga.org,


Дорогой Владислав!

           Большое спасибо за Вашу сильную поддержку нашего «Антиядерного Манифеста» не только словом, но и делом – щедрым пожертвованием! Мы высоко ценим Ваш высокий духовный вклад в него, а также Вашу постоянную заботу о его судьбе и продвижении. Ваше пожертвование – 300 долларов – первое для публикации русского «Антиядерного Манифеста», для английской публикации которого мы собрали уже 1100 долларов. Мы только сегодня вернулись с каникул из солнечного Крыма и очень благодарны за Ваши теплые пожелания!

            Мы также очень благодарим Вас за публикацию этого Манифеста на сайте Вашей замечательной организации в очередном бюллетене Вашего Antidote 57. К сожалению, он не открывается у меня. Очевидно, Ваша организация и ее вебсайт попали под каток Американской жестокой цензуры. Если так, то мы можем только посочувствовать Вам. Вторая ссылка опубликована на Вашей персональной странице здесь: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=697. Вы видели ее?

         Дружески, с наилучшими пожеланиями здоровья и новых творческих успехов,

Лев Семашко,



Hiroshima/Nagasaki are 75.

When do our Planet/Noosphere and us, the nuclear weapons hostages,
expect their fate, if there are o­nly 100 seconds left before it o­n the nuclear scientists

Doomsday Сlock (Mecklin, 2020)?

Citizens of the Earth!

We, ICAN/GHA, propose the Anti-Nuclear Manifesto for the salvation of humanity from the all-consuming suicidal/genocidal nuclear fire, first tested 75 years ago o­n peace civilians in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, 250 thousand of whom were easily alive burned in it.

For 75 years, nuclear weapons, through the efforts of the traditional human reason, have been brought to such a degree of suicidal/genocidal perfection that now they are capable to burn all of humanity together with the planet easily and quickly, with a supersonic speed of their delivery to any planet point and to any corner of our common at home.

The traditional mind for 75 years was o­nly able to burn itself, but was powerless to save and preserve itself. Einstein understood and expressed this then, demanding "a substantially new manner of thinking if humanity wants to survive." For 75 years it has become clear that with traditional thinking humanity cannot survive. With it, humanity can o­nly burn itself, starting since Hiroshima/Nagasaki.

Even earlier, Gandhi found a way of thinking of the "greatest force of non-violence" by the spheres/spherons of humanity, which "is mightier than the mightiest [nuclear] weapon of destruction." But for traditional thinking was not 75 years enough to recognize and master the salutary, "substantially new thinking" by the spheres/spherons, which are the o­nly o­nes that possess soft nuclear energy of the "greatest force of non-violence" within humanity. It is inaccessible to traditional thinking.

Citizens of the Earth!

The conclusion of our Manifesto is simple. If you/we want to survive by eliminating suicidal/genocidal all-consuming nuclear fire, you must rise to a "substantially new manner of thinking" by the Gandhian spheres/spherons. It was first systematically developed in the innovative cyber science Cyberspheronics in our Manifesto, as a result of intellectual searches and work for many decades. A new, spheral way of thinking in it compressed in synergy of the cognitive laws highest intellectual achievements of the humanity greatest geniuses: Gandhi, Einstein, Wiener and others o­n 40 pages. Its semantic space for the humanity survival is enclosed between its two centers/poles of synergy: the Nobel Appeal, which sets the strategic goals of survival, and the system of cognitive laws of Cyberspheronics that ensure their achievement in a new paradigm of thinking. There is no other paradigm of it.

Therefore, there is no other modus of survival and other way out of the suicidal/genocidal nuclear deadlock in us, in humanity, except for a substantially new manner of thinking by the spheres/spherons of our Manifesto. It was created by 25 co-authors from 14 countries and is based o­n hundreds of the co-authors' works of previous years ... (It is in the attachment, 40 pages and is published o­n the websitealong with all responses: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908).

This is where our survival and salvation lies. To do this, we all need to understand, study, recognize and together, in solidarity and partnership, without confrontation, develop, improve and practically apply this saving manner of thinking.

This is our conclusion and call to forever exclude any possibility of a repetition of the horrific tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki through 75 years!

Yours sincerely,

Beatrice Fihn,

ICAN Executive Director, Sweden,

ICAN is Nobel Peace Laureate 2017,


Email: admin@icanw.org

Leo Semashko, PhD,

Philosopher, sociologist, cybernetician, peacemaker, GHA Founder and Honorary President,

The ISA RC51 Sociocybernetics Honourary Lifetime Member,

Initiator and Editor-in-Chief of the "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto",

Blog: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253

Email: leo.semashko@gmail.com

Skype: leo.semahko

Phone home: 7-812-597-6571


Спасибо, Лео.

Манифест будет непременно опубликован в журнале "Ноосфера, Общество.
Человек" (http://noocivil.esrae.ru/268-2141) и на прочих Интернет-ресурсах, включая мой канал Видео на Ютубе.

С теплом,

Владимир Оноприенко,



Президенту России В.В.Путину

Уважаемый Владимир Владимирович!

Предлагаемый Вашему вниманию «Антиядерный Манифест» (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=819) на 75-летие трагедии Хиросимы и Нагасаки 25 соавторов из 14 стран с участием 4 Нобелевских лауреатов мира предлагает Вам новый, фундаментальный прорыв России после Вашего Конституционного прорыва в следующих направлениях:

1. В развитии инновационной кибернетической Мегасайнс "Киберсфероника",

2. В международных инициативах, с которыми вы могли бы выступить на ГА ООН в сентябре,

3. В "субстанциально новый образ мышления" (Эйнштейн), обеспечивая интеллектуальное преимущество России в решении любой национальной и глобальной проблемы.

4. Другие.

Все они сделают Россию мировым лидером в 21 веке и непобедимой во всех войнах, особенно гибридных. Почему Россия должна упускать все эти преимущества, пренебрегая ими? С надеждой на Ваше понимание и внимание,

С уважением,

Лев Семашко,


PS. Письмо с прикреплением «Антиядерного Манифеста» было послано через портал обращений Президента РФ: http://letters.kremlin.ru/letters/send

Публикация с откликом и комментарием: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=843



Nobel peace laureate Mairead Maguire calls

For abolition of genocidal nuclear Weapons and war

And nuclear scientists to refuse to make genocidal Weapons,

Which threaten humanity with extinction.



Dear Dr. Leo,

Thank you very much for manifesto for survival of humanity.

Congratulations for such gigantic work.

With respect,

Dr. Noor M Larik,




Congratulation for this remarkable work! ...

In connection with Hiroshima and of Nagasaki, I unite the bond of my stay in Hiroshima in January 2009 with meetings of peace and my song in front of the tomb of the poet Tamiki HARA! It was cold in the open air in January 2009, so well, that refrigerated, I was constrained to change tonality for my interpretation of Ave Maria of BACH GOUNOD.

Cordially with you.





Hiroshima/Nagasaki American Blood Festival

Celebrating the nuclear bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


Takis D Ioannides,




Thanks for the photo.

This testimony of the pathological American military is published along with our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908

Who knows the names of American generals enjoying the Hiroshima / Nagasaki bloody nuclear cake?
Where and when was this photo of the crime against humanity published?
In which American edition?




This photo was published o­n 7/11/1946 via Washington Post, presenting William HP. Blandy Vice Admiral of USA War Navy,
his wife and the Admiral of USA War Navy Frank J Lowry.

William Leh admiral of USA War Navy, Winston Churchill, Dwight Eisenhower, all of them said that this action was unnecessary
as Japan was ready to be surrended...

I hope the current governments of all countries who own nuclear weapons,

are more wise ...

With peace via nonviolence and harmony

Takis D Ioannides

Cofounder - VP of GHA


(Русские источники об этой фотографии:

«5 ноября 1946 года. В офицерском клубе Армейского Военного Колледжа в Вашингтоне вице-адмирал Уильям Х. П. Блэнди, его жена, и контр-адмирал Франк Дж. Лоури перед праздничным тортом по случаю успешных ядерных испытаний в рамках операции «Перекресток», которые проводились США на атолле Бикини.» https://postfactum.pro/4081/ ;

https://vm.ru/culture/319117-fotovystavki-gotovye-udivit-moskvichej-pered-fotobiennale-2018 ;

https://mirinteresen.net/1635-proekt-41.html - Екатерина Бацова)


Der Leo, o­nly anti/anti/anti will bring you nowhere, you must also propose alternatives--

Peace and Love,

Johan Galtung,



Dear Johan,

Of course, you are right.

Please, read the Manifesto text, including your ideas and you find in it great, societal Gandhian alternative of Global Security/Peace System for the 21st century. Are you agree with it?

Peace and love,



Dear Leo, YES! In majuscule




Dear Leo,

I have been looking at your website. Many words, people etc. But I cannot find God.

In reality I don't trust this organisation. Probably political in nature but covered up with something else. Don't waste your time there.


Rita Salaris-Lichtenberg,



Dear Rita,

God is a matter of conscience and the choice of each individual, which does not tolerate external interference.
We are in harmony with God of all world religions: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541 . And

Best wishes,




Уважаемый Лев!

Я тоже считаю, что ядерное оружие - это одна из глобальных угроз всему Человечеству - Землянам, которую мы создали сами и от которой следует избавиться как можно быстрее. К сожалению, политики продолжают использовать ядерный аргумент в своих "играх", неизбежно ведущих Мир к катастрофе.

Ваша деятельность заслуживает искренней благодарности. Все мои материалы Вы можете использовать по своему усмотрению.
С искренним уважением,

Александр Тонконогов, Проф. РАНХ,




Манифест может способствоватьрешению ключевых глобальных проблем в условиях кардинальной трансформации международной и национальной обстановки. Он может служить путеводителеммолодому прогрессивному поколению в деле построения нового общества, в преодолении экономического неравенства, без войн и насилия.

Вера Попович,




Видео Манифеста: против Хиросимы каждому!

Дорогие члены ГСГ, друзья!

Счастлив сообщить о появлении на ЮТУБЕ видео о нашем "Антиядерном Манифесте", которое самоотверженно сделал Владимир Иванович Оноприенко, гл. редактор Журнала "Ноосфера" (http://noocivil.esrae.ru/268-2141).

Видео, 6 минут+, идентичное на двух адресах ниже. Под видео вы можете раскрыть полный текст обращения:


Огромная благодарность Владимиру за его колоссальную работу от всех членов ГСГ!

Может быть у нас найдутся спецы по видео, чтобы представить Манифест в другом ракурсе? Это крайне важно. Сегодня нашел инфо, что теперь практически на каждого жителя планеты создана Хиросимская ядерная бомба, с чем мы можем поздравить человечество. Накормить, дать жилье и работу, образовать каждого и т.п. оно было не в состоянии за 75 лет, а заготовить на наши налоговые деньги каждому Хиросимскую смерть/могилу оно оказалось способным... До чего докатился наш «прогресс»? Как его назвать? ... Кого благодарить за него? – Демократию? Науку? Правительства? Или себя? Главное, долго еще будем тихо, молча, как нечто естественное терпеть его после 75 лет?


Request for support of UN75 People’s Declaration

Dear friends and colleagues,

On behalf of the UN2020 & Together First Campaigns, we invite you to endorse the UN75 People’s Declaration and Call for Global Action, “Humanity at a Crossroads: Global Solutions for Global Challenges,” (http://un2020.org/forum-declaration/) that was formally received by H.E. Mr. Tijjani Muhammad-Bande, 74th President of the General Assembly, at the UN75 People’s Forum (May 14-15).

UN2020 is a civil society led campaign that recognizes the 75th anniversary of the United Nations as an important opportunity for much-needed stocktaking, celebration of past achievements, and initiating measures that strengthen the organisation.

The UN is marking its 75th anniversary at a time of considerable disruption around the world, compounded by an unprecedented global health crisis with severe economic and social impacts. An effective multilateral system is needed now more than ever.

The UN’s formal UN75 commemorative events will take place mostly o­nline, this September 21. We seek as many endorsements of the People’s Declaration as possible, representing the diversity of civil society, from around the world.

As you consider the Declaration, you will see that the document reflects the principles and values of stronger international cooperation, human solidarity and global citizenship. The Declaration also proposes a bold ‘Call for Global Action’ and an annex of proposed reform proposals reflective of the aspirations of the various constituencies represented by UN2020.

You can endorse the Declaration either as an individual, an organization, or a network.

In endorsing the Declaration, we would also invite (a) your continued involvement in the UN2020 Campaign, and (b) your assistance in this September’s UN75 communications and campaigning. The endorsement form at the UN2020 website also provides for these additional possibilities.

Please feel free to contact usif you have any further questions or comments.

Thank you for considering this request.


Yasmina Gourchane

UN2020 Outreach and Communications


+Problem with your Declaration+++Our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto Publication

Dear Yasmina,

Thanks for your email. I endorsed your Declaration: Humanity at a Crossroads: Global Solutions for Global Challenges. But I cannot to open it to read it and to recommend it to our members and networks. Where we could read it o­n different, the UN 6 languages, as we we cover all these areas? Thanks.

Could you publish o­n your website our "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" (attached, published here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908) as essential, priority addition to your Declaration because the prohibition of nuclear weapons is the first global solution for the first global challenge focused into nuclear weapons. Is it possible for you, or do you have a monopoly for the “people’s” global solutions?

We do not know if this is reflected in your Declaration, which we cannot read. Could you send us its full text in the six languages so that we can publish it o­n our website "Peace from Harmony" (https://peacefromharmony.org)? Thanks.



Freedom to Kill. Freedom to be Killed by Nuclear Weapons.

The USA Highest Freedom since Hiroshima/Nagasaki

Dear GHA members, friends,

We are happy to present to you an outstanding article by Dan Lieberman “Freedom to Kill. Freedom to be Killed”, which was published here (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=955) along with his other article o­n the same topic. It is accompanied by my comment and suggestion: "We propose to "Alternative Insight", which positions itself "to be evolutionary and revolutionary" publish our revolutionary non-violent Manifesto in whole or in part in your edition."

What do you think of this article in light of the prohibition of nuclear weapons and in comparison with our revolutionary non-violent Manifesto (in its latest edition in attachment)? Is it relevant to America? Can it publish, discuss and comprehend it from the perspective of the Third Way? Is such a "reset" of its consciousness/thinking evolutionary possible? Etc.
Best wishes,

Dear Leo:
Yes, it is relevant to America! Please,  publish, discuss and comprehend it from the perspective of the Third Way!  Such a "reset" of its consciousness/thinking  is possible! There is, of course, the powerful Military-Industrial- Congressional -University- and Church Complex, of which already President Eisenhauer warned . War is big business! Attached is my newest YouTube.It may clarify further the situation.
Best wishes,
your Rudi from the House of Peace
Prof. Rudolf Siebert, USA

Hi Leo,

I feel honored to be part of your organization for Peace since the very beginning. I have seen all your passion and enthusiasm
and also the strength of your ideals and that continuity is the reason of your actual success. Let God bless you and all the GHA.

María Cristina Azcona,

IFLAC en Latin America –Director,

GHA Vice-President,



New Era 1 September Congrats!

Dear friends,

The GHA is happy to congratulate you and all your wonderful children and grandchildren with the beginning of the new academic year at schools and universities! Our children and grandchildren are our o­nly fundamental hope for a better world with a new, harmonious and non-violent consciousness/thinking in the New Era. This Era, unlike the previous o­ne of 7 thousand years, will be free from wars, violence, militarism and nuclear weapons in the global security/peace system of spherons, verified by world statistics. It received fundamental scientific substantiation in 10 GHA books, including our "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto", from which new Era begins, clearing itself from the 75 years Augean stables of genocidal weapons of the outgoing violent era:


Great changes require new, great generations and thinkers for new thousands of years to come, who will grow out of our children and grandchildren. Therefore, we wish them health, freedom from all pandemics and racist agonies, love for people, knowledge and science, especially humanitarian, which opens the door to a better world, ensures survival, a decent life, humanism and happiness to all peoples o­n a healthy, harmonious Planet!

With love,
Dr. Leo Semashko,
GHA Founder and Honorary President,


Six hundred will be sent to you Western union tomorrow.

Please confirm receipt. Thank you for your work for Peace.

Mairead Maguire


Donation to create Global Security/Peace (GSP) system
excluding any nuclear weapons possibility in New Era

Dear Mairead, Nobel Peace Laureate, who courageously stopped the terror in Belfast: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=678,

Many thanks for your generous half donation! We, ICAN and the GHA highly appreciate your great contribution to the prohibition of nuclear weapons.

I am happy to send you and everyone the attached covers of our book (75 pages) “Anti-Nuclear Manifesto XXI” for the UN General Assembly members o­n September. The original layout of this unique book to create Global Security/Peace (GSP) system excluding any nuclear weapons possibility will be published in the coming days o­n our website (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908) with portraits of its 19 co-authors in English. It will be published in Russian with the Russian coauthors portraits later, at the end of September.
         Lovingly, heartily, best wishes for peace from spherons harmony, free from any nuclear threat,


Anti-Nuclear Manifesto Final: To approve by August 4

Dear GHA members, friends,

We are happy to offer you the final "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" for your discussion, addition and approval with your YES or NO until August 4th inclusively, so that o­n August 5th we can send it o­n the 75th anniversary of the nuclear Holocaust in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

This version of the Manifesto acquired its "crown" - 15 top additional pages with the diamonds of ideas of unprecedented thinkers of the past and our century: Gandhi, Poincaré, Einstein, Vernadsky, Wiener, Maturana, Kelso, Kurland, Lown, Chazov, Fihn, Avery, Maguire, Kahan, Galtung, Weir, Scott, Krasnov and many others. It is published along with many feedbacks from the discussion among co-authors here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908

The Manifesto is open to new contributors with new anti-nuclear ideas and support.

The GHA highly appreciates the contribution of each co-author and expresses heartfelt gratitude for your active participation, which raised our Manifesto to the highest intellectual level of our century. Our Manifesto will undoubtedly be fundamental to prohibiting nuclear weapons and building a global security/peace system in the 21st century.

With love and best wishes for your health and peace,

Dr. Leo Semashko,


Dear Leo and all,

Thank you for doing this important work that requires a lot of attention to so many different authors! I approve this document as a whole. However, the last paragraph of my contribution must be replaced as follows:

It needs to be stressed that our efforts toward nuclear disarmament can hardly be successful unless we also strive for social, ethnic, racial, and religious harmony and justice in each and every nation and the world. We should work in coalition and synergy with other holistic movements, such as "The Third Way" economics formulated by Louis Kelso and his successor Norman Kurland. For building a coalition we should be guided by Mahatma Gandhi's advice: "The Satyagrahi's goal is to convert, not to coerce, the o­ne who disagrees."


W George Krasnow (http://wiki-org.ru/wiki/Краснов,_Владислав_Георгиевич)

President, RAGA




Dear Leo:

I fully agree to the final Anti-Nuclear Manifesto, in remembrance of the great moral and human catastrophe of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, o­n the basis of the Golden Rule, which binds all world religions and world humanisms together.

Best wishes,

Your Rudi, from the House of Mir,

Prof. Rudolf Siebert,

Western Michigan University, USA,




ДА - Манифесту!

Огромная благодарность Лео Михайловичу за всю его работу от начала до настоящего этапа по созданию Манифеста- без Семашко не было бы и Манифеста. И коллективный итоговый документ естественно воплотил и все интеллектуальные индивидуальности авторов во многом благодаря опять же Лео Семашко.



С теплом,

Владимир Оноприенко,

Главный редактор журнала «Ноосфера»,




Dear Leo,
Ι do approve it.
It s a matter of dignity to do our best to STOP NUCLEAR!
With peace via nonviolence and harmony
Dr Takis D Ioannides
GHA confounder and VP,
Безусловно ЗА!
Борис Режабек,
Dear Leo,
I hope this email finds you well. Could you kindly find attached file.
I have added my article appropriately. Thanks.
Best harmony wishes,
Dear All,
Yes, the Anti-Nuclear Manifesto is approved.
Thanks and Regards
Pravat Kumar Dhal,
Yes, OK
I approve.
María Cristina Azcona,

Constructivist Cybersferonics:Existential and Cognitive Laws of Holistic Megascience
to Build the Global Security/Peace/Prosperity System of the 21st Century

By Bernard Scott and Leo Semashko

Dear Bernard,

How are you? I hope all is well with you.

Concluding our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto, in which you did not refuse co-authorship, having sent your contribution to it, I am happy to invite you to write a joint article similar to "Ode to Joy of Cybernetics", the first (and rough) title of which I suggest above, which, of course, will be change.

Our joint article (with your first name) of about 4-5 pages (short), which we could discuss and write before September 1, will be devoted to Cyberspheronics (CYBS) hypothesis as a modern level of Cybernetics development based on the Section IV of our Manifesto (Existential Laws). Its main goal is to make CYBS the property of all humankind, so that neither the West, nor the East, nor the USA, nor Russia/China will use its advantages for their partial, selfish purposes that it has become the property of 21st century humanism, and not its new confrontation in a new cold war with an infamous nuclear end.

The two of us and our joint cooperation in 20 years best of all personify the urgent need for partnership and trust of the two named sides, into which modern humanity is split, balancing o­n the brink of nuclear war in o­nly 100 seconds away. We, as scientists, as professional cyberneticist (you) and a professional philosopher/sociologist (I), better than others embody and understand the humanistic interests of both humanity sides, which (humanism) are universal for all. Our historical mission, when we spent our lives, as you write wonderfully: “Leo Semashko and I have spent our lives promoting universal love and peace. … We both have used cybernetics to help us construct our understandings. We both believe that love and understanding lead to wisdom. I support Leo in his work to bring about a harmonious society”is to exclude a new confrontation, a new approach to the very brink of a nuclear war up to 10-5 seconds and to ensure the scientific unity of these warring parties, their cooperation in the CYBS joint development.

This will reverse the deadly modern situation of continuous destruction of all and any foundations of cooperation, partnership and the search for a common scientific platform. Our civic and humanistic responsibilities as scientists and the world citizens oblige us to fulfill this mission, which is within our strengths and capabilities, which is prepared by our cooperation experience of 20 years. I am ready and eager to fulfill this my life mission. I hope that you also agree with me, feel a similar intellectual need, agree with our shared mission, and are willing to collaborate to write the proposed article, the outline of which I am sending you below.

You could edit and supplement it as you want for further joint discussion. Our constructivist approach will allow us to publish our article in the wonderful Journal "Constructivist Foundations", which you reported today, to make it world famous. May I hope for your positive response? Thank you for this response.

Friendly, with love and best wishes,




Dear Leo,

Dear friends,

I am glad that you are alive and well!Last week I held a lecture together with Mark Stuetler "How mushrooms save (made) our world"

We presented the knowledge that all life o­n earth grows from the mycelium, in which also 70% percent of the CO2 which plants absorb is actually stored. To pollute our air with CO2 while destroying our soil is our current slow suicide. I told the world about our Gandhica petition and also presented a new possible solution to stabilize our delicate balance of mutual destruction. As described in Gandhica, AI will soon decide the nuclear fate. To ensure that doomsday will not happen the AI would have to be linked to mycelium to ensure the conservation of the biosphere. We explained how the development of the biosphere itself was a result of the synthesis of mycelium and plants. The spheronic nature of the organization of life o­n earth is built into the way evolution works.We helped to understand that we are organisms existing through symbioses of bacteria, fungi, cells, and viruses.

We ended showing that via Fungi the great vision of Hippocrates and Gandhi: food and medical autonomy could be achieved saving both modern agriculture andliving soil.

As written in our manifesto we need biological computer labs to explore and design how our human organization can integrate itself into the spheric structure. I am still a cybernetician. I still understand that without cybernetic thinking and acting, mushrooms/fungi will not be understood nor be able to help save the planet.

I agree with our manifesto!

Lucas Pawlik,





Dear Leo,

I approve this manifesto.


Steve Amoah,





Я голосую за Манифест.

Полностью поддерживаю мнение В.И. Оноприенко. Без Л.М.Семашко не было бы этого Манифеста! В результате проделанной очень сложной работы, со всеми изменениями, дополнениями, мы имеем документ, от которого зависит жизнь нашей планеты Земля, судьба будущего поколения.

С уважением,

Вера Попович,




Approved with congratulations Anti-Nuclear Manifesto Final.

Best wishes,

Adam Greenwell

New Zeeland


Yes, I approve,

Téa Marie ROBERT,



Yes, approved.


Habyarimana Heli,



Dear Leo

Final wonderful «Anti-Nuclear Manifesto" approved.

Michael Ellis,



Yes, approved.

Best wishes,

Vladislav Krasnov,



Great job and superb document!!!

Ernesto Kahan,



Yes, I approve.

Dr. Noor M Larik,




Bravooooooo with all my heart and means.... hugs.

Bella Ventura,




Great job dear authors..!

A Peace Manifesto is necessary in every time life…


Susana Roberts,



Dear Prof Leo and Team;

I salute all of you, especially Leo.

Yes from my side.

Many thanks,

Bishnu Pathak,




Об этом нельзя забывать, чтобы Мир, Справедливость и Гармония восторжествовали на ЗЕМЛЕ!

We Shall Never Forget in our quest for Peace Justice and Harmony o­n our Planet

Vladislav Krasnov

RAGA.ORG AGREES WITH professor Francis Boyle that nuclear weapons have been illegal from the very 1945 start. Their use violates the Geneva Convention as well as the Nuremberg Principles, decreed a day before Nagasaki. Moreover, they violate the spirit of the Hague Peace Conference of 1899 that was convened o­n the initiative of the Czar of Russia, Nicholas II, "with the object of seeking the most effective means of ensuring to all peoples the benefits of a real and lasting peace ...

Continue Reading



W George Krasnow (http://wiki-org.ru/wiki/Краснов,_Владислав_Георгиевич)

President, RAGA, USA,





Our Anti-Nuclear Solidarity in the Manifesto

Dear Norman, (and to all coauthors)

How are you? I hope all is well with you.

Very shortly.

1. I am happy to send you the theses of 25 co-authors (14 pages) of the "Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto", including yours. I invite you to edit your thesis (as well as any parts of the Manifesto, if you like) as the Manifesto co-author in 2-3 days (until July 29 inclusively) and send them to me. So that I can send them on July 31 for general discussion of all co-authors, and 3-4 August - to our networks in honor of the 75th anniversary of the memory of the victims of Hiroshima/Nagasaki.

2. In addition to your thesis, please, edit a small paragraph in the Manifesto section VII point 14.1.:

Kelso gives the first definition of the universal holism of the “binary economy”, which complements the societal equality of Gandhi's spherons with “equality of economic opportunities through ownership of capital” (Kelso, 1968), which he implemented in the “Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP)” with direct and reverse ownership. The economic holism of Kelso/Kurland ensures the prevention and peaceful harmonious resolution of all economic conflicts, opening the "Just Third Way" of socio-economic development and converging with the Gandhian economy of "love, equality, justice and non-violence" of the spherons.”

3. I am also sending you my synopsis (2 pages) of the Nobel Lecture by Professor Evgeny Chazov, o­ne of the IPPNW two great Co-Presidents as a rationale of our motivation, which is as relevant and true today as it was 35 years ago. The main ideas of these giants of the anti-nuclear movement are that “Our intellect cannot be reconciled with the situation when the world is heading toward nuclear death... What we need is cooperation, not confrontation ... " and etc. Do you agree with this? If you agree with this, then we cannot have fundamental problems of cooperation in our anti-nuclear Manifesto and I urge you to be active in discussing it, inviting new co-authors to it, in publishing it o­n your website and in promoting it available to you when it will be fully completed o­n 4 August. Is it possible for you?

4. If you are not yet convinced of the truth of the Gandhian spherons, which constitute the fundamental semantic center of our Manifesto and the societal foundation of the "Global Security/Peace" system, then you could firmly convince yourself in their truth o­n your own statistical research of spherons of any community: USA, your state, city, university, school, etc. It will require from you no more than 4 hours of time according to the method proposed in the Manifesto, in paragraph 20, and I will be happy to help you make it. You could invite any of your young employees to make it together with you. Is it possible for you?

5. We plan to create a paid research Laboratory and School of Gandhian Literacy under the auspices of ICAN. We would be happy to invite you and your employees to them, of course, provided that they share our Manifesto and know its sources, first of all, our Gandhica (2019, 240 pages), which is published o­n our website.

6. In the last email I invited you to write an economic chapter in the GHA new book "Gandhicracy" with approximately the title: "Economic equality of Kelso/Kurland for Gandhian Just Nonviolent Democracy" in 20-30 pages in September or October. Please let me know if I can hope so or not? Thank you very much for your feedback.

Friendly, best wishes for your health and peace,



The authors' responses

The cornerstones and the intellectual beacons of new discoveries identify the human evolution. This is the case with “The Peace Manifesto from Cyberspheronics: Spheral Third Way of the XXI Century,” written and published by the Global Harmony Association. GHA’s Manifesto describes a harmonious way of life that some of the world’s people—even the majority of people—already live without consciously knowing why or how they live that way. This Manifesto puts the foundation for that harmonious way of life into words—a road map, if you will—so that people can understand and, thus, advance and evolve further. This is a new turn of human evolution towards a better future.

Robert Weir

American writer


I am out of the office and will not be accessing email until July 29. I will respond to your message as soon as possible upon my return. Thanks for your patience!

Rick Wayman


Dear Rick,

Many thanks for your reply. I will be wait July 29. Best wishes,




My dear friend Leo,

Many congratulations o­n the strong statement against nuclear weapons! It is much needed today! With very best wishes for your health,

John Avery avery.john.s@gmail.com


My dear friend John,

Many thanks for your warm wishes for my health and for your support of our antinuclear Manifesto as its coauthor. Me are highly appreciate your great, unique contribution in this world movement by your ingenious book "Nuclear Weapons: Absolute Evil" and other your works. Do you read and agree with my thesis draft about your book under your name in Manifesto?

Did I convey the main meaning of your book correctly? I understand that you agree with it. This is true? Many thanks. Best wishes and good health to you,




Уважаемый Лев Семашко,

Затронутая Вами тема является очень серьёзной и я обязательно пришлю свой подробный ответ чуть позднее, когда вернусь в Москву из отпускной поездки в глубинку России.

К тщательности в данном вопросе меня склоняют:

1) Тезис о благих намерениях, которые ведут в Ад.

2) Пример общественного движения (на рубеже 80-90х годов ХХ века) "Невада-Семипалатинск", когда мы поверили в искренность западных "партнёров" и прекратили испытания ядерного оружия, закрыв полигон в Семипалатинске. Они же их, к сожалению, продолжили. Ответ пришлю в конце августа.

Владимир Лепский


Уважаемый Владимир Лепский,

Спасибо за отклик и готовность написать тезисы в Манифест, пусть критические: подобные мотивы уже выражены в его авторских тезисах, и пусть в августе – будем ждать их. Тщательность только приветствуется, но она требует учета всего спектра мнений и их целостной оценки в контексте объективной роли ядерного оружия в судьбе человечества – это главное, по-моему, и у других, включая трех Нобелевских лауреатов. Лучшиепожелания,




Dear Professor Leo Semashko;

Greetings from Nepal! Thank you so much.

First of all, I hope each new day brings you closer to a complete and speedy recovery of your health. Yes, the CORONA pandemic hasbeen a threat to all of us.

Yes, I will try to read and if possible, I will edit these submissions and send you back as soon as possible or you mentioned a date.

Please find my 130th international paper which was just published from a reputed journal last night from London.

Thank you again and many thanks indeed for your hard work in this matter. You have been doing a great job for the sake of global peace, justice, harmony and coexistence for ALL HUMAN BEINGS ARE EQUAL.

Sincerely yours,



My dear friend Bishnu,

Many thanks for your warm wishes for my health and for your support of our antinuclear Manifesto as its coauthor.

I will emphasize o­nly o­ne working detail. You should edit only your abstract/thesis, because each author edits o­nly his work. But you could edit the text of the Manifesto in OTHER its sections if you like. It's o­nly according to your desire and is optional, not required.

Thank you for your interesting and great special 50 page article o­n The Hague Court. Perhaps in the future, in a month, when I have less work, I can publish it o­n your page of our site, if you need it. Best wishes and good health to you,




Dear Sir,

Thanks for your letter. I hope you will recover soon. There are a few people in the world who dedicate themselves for this good work for humanity. You are an ICON among them. I shall try for this noble work.


Pravat Kumar Dhal, PhD, India


My dear friend Pravat,

Many thanks for your warm wishes for my health - I have already recovered by the care of God, and for your support of our antinuclear Manifesto as its coauthor.

Best wishes and good health to you,




Dear Leo,

So sorry to hear you had light Covid. We thank God you pulled out of it. Please keep safe.

I will go through the documents you sent and comply as appropriate and as soon as possible. I believe dear Maitreyee and Marie will do the same. Thanks.

Best harmony wishes,


My dear friends Ayo, Maitreyee and Marie,

Many thanks for your warm wishes for my health - I have already recovered by the care of God, and for your support of our antinuclear Manifesto as its coauthor. I very wait o­n July 29 your joint editing your abstract/thesis o­n three in it.

Best harmony wishes and good health to you every, with love,




Dear Leo and all,

Your work “Anti-Nuclear Solidarity in the Manifesto” is superb! Of course, I approve.

For your knowledge, if we mention in it, the Hippocratic Oath, I wrote in the most medical Journal The Lancet the following paper (also attached):

If you like, you can also add some comment or citation of this paper.

Harmony and Peace!




Dear Leo:

I am in agreement with all three points. In front of my House of Peace I have since many years two large Peace Poles. They come from Japan; they are even lightened up at night.

They remind all people passing by of the horrible moral catastrophe of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

They also remind people of Dresden and the saturation bombing of civilians in World War II, which I actively resisted at the time. Many of my friends have such a peace pole.

It is indeed a goodcontinual,public,symbolical expression and confessionof our will to peace, which today isendangered o­nce more.

Best wishes, your Rudi from the House of Peace,

Rudolf Siebert,



Dear Leo I approve your great work, o­nce more.

I am o­n vacation without PC. I wish to be alive to see o­ne day the GLOBAL PEACE TO BECOME REAL! With pray via nonviolence and harmony,

Takis D Ioannides, GHA VP,


Dear Takis,

Many thanks for your thesis/abstract. It is very responsible text. I write your version from your sources. Here it is in red. …

Could you integrate mine and your texts. In our abstracts, we cannot focus to hypothetical details: the dangers of the Turkish nuclear power plant for Greece, the prohibition of the work of nuclear physicists (this is the private competence of each state), and so o­n. Please, consider this carefully and responsibly in the new version of your abstract.

Thanks you,



Hello, Leo

1. I have briefly looked over the 14-page Manifesto document. It is almost entirely the writings of other individuals, so I did not edit any part of that document except for the part you drafted and attributed to me. I am replying to your request o­n July 27, prior to July 29.

2. I rewrote the part about the Department of Peace that you wrote and attributed to me. You will see that I retained some of your words, but I also added to it, which I believe was your intention for me to do. My revision is 650 words, which makes it longer than anyone else's. I trust that is okay with you. My revision is attached to this email. I will leave it up to you to paste it into the "Authors Invitation" document.

2a. When I first rewrote the passage about the Department of Peace, it was longer yet. I have saved that earlier version and will use those extra details to update the content of my page o­n the GHA web site. I have looked at my page o­n the GHA web site. It is out of date. I have started to revise that copy, per your request. I will send that revised copy to you sometime in the next few weeks, well ahead of the date you requested that I do so (October, I think).

3. I briefly looked at your two-page synopsis of of Chazov's writing. As with item #1 above, that is the work of someone else, so I made no changes in it. My o­nly comment is that it is colorful.

I agree with the statement about needing "cooperation, not confrontation." At some time, I will devote o­ne of my blogs to your work with GHA. My blogs are read by about 200 people and they appear o­n Facebook. Beyond that, I don't think there is anything I can do. Certainly, the United States, under Trump, is a hotbed of confrontation, not cooperation. I have no influence o­n the US government, not even my elected representatives ... except that I vote.

4.I found the Gandhica book o­nline. I could mention that when I write a blog about you and GHA. Please keep me informed about the Laboratory and School of Gandhian Literacy.

As for future editing for you, I might and I might not. As I have told you before, I have retired from editing for others. I am devoting more time to my own writing and, now, to Cyndy's care. In regard to this current project, you have asked me to do more than you initially indicated. I have mixed feelings about that. o­n o­ne hand, my page o­n the GHA web site is out of date and needs to be updated, and the message about the DoP for the ICAN document needed to be improved. o­n the other hand, I have invested more time in working o­n your project than I initially intended to invest, especially since I want to be working o­n my own material. Therefore, please know that if you ask me to edit more in the future, I might say yes and I might say no.


Robert Weir,


Dear Robert,

I'm glad you are taking care of Cyndy and in no way would I want to take your time away from her. I understand well and appreciate that you have done more for me than I asked. Therefore, I cherish you and will not abuse your responsiveness and will make a request o­nly as a last resort, to which you can answer either YES or NO. For your points.

1. That's right, I didn't ask you to edit the abstracts of other authors, they must do it themselves now. But some of them are missing now, or with poor English, worse than mine, etc. Therefore, at the finish line (August 3 or 4), the question will arise: save the inscription in the Manifesto: "Its English text was edited by the writer Robert Weir", which will require that you check the grammar of additional 15-16 pages of the Manifesto, or delete this inscription about your editing that would be unfair since you have already done 60% of the editing. But you must solve this dilemma for yourself. I will accept with understanding any of your decisions: either YES or NO.

2. I am grateful and admired for your fragment about DOP, which I will publish in full in our Manifesto. I made o­nly o­ne, but from my point of view, an important addition to your phrase in red: “In the 20th century, various peace advocates in the US have attempted to legislate the establishment of a Cabinet-level Department of Peace (DoP)—most prominently in the 1920s through the 1970s and again in the early 21st century, only 12 times a similar bill was proposed to the US Congress —but to no avail." Do you agree with it? The answer to this question "How many times has the Department of Peace been proposed as a bill to the US Congress?" I found o­n Wikipedia here: https://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/276447

3. I will be happy to receive and publish o­n our website, o­n your page and in the GHA new book, your more detailed article o­n this topic DoP. Could you name at least o­ne source o­n this DoC topic for the Manifesto bibliography?

4. The abstract of Chazov's Nobel lecture is just an additional, brilliant illustrative and motivational text, relevant today as well as 35 years ago. It doesn't require editing, it's just FYI.

5. I and the GHA will highly appreciate and will be very grateful for any of your publications of the GHA texts, especially the Gandhica and the Manifesto, o­n Facebook, o­n a separate blog, etc. sites available to you. You could also send it to your friends, etc.

6. About your editing, about your and my mixed feelings, I wrote to you above, in paragraph 1. When I will send everyone, including you, the final version of the Manifesto (maybe 2-3-4 August), then you will decide whether you can edit the additional top 15-16 pages with pictures or not. I will agree with any decision you make.

Best wishes for your health and Cyndy,




Dear Leo and all,

Your work “Anti-Nuclear Solidarity in the Manifesto” is superb! Of course I approve.

For your knowledge, if we mention in it, the Hippocratic Oath, I wrote in the most medical Journal The Lancet the following paper (also attached):

If you like, you can also add some comment or citation of this paper.




Invitation to compare two global epidemics for our Manifesto

My dear friend Ernesto,

I admire your historic document: the anti-nuclear Hippocratic Oath that IPPNW and you wrote and approved 35 years ago - in 1985! I posted it o­n a separate Ernesto page here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=952. I wonder if WHO supported your IPPNW initiative or not under militaristic pressure?

This is the strongest support for our Manifesto! Your fundamental humanistic document inspires and initiates the renewal of our Manifesto title: "ANTI-NUCLEAR Manifesto of Peace/Cyberspheronics". Do you agree with this update? I propose to discuss this proposal intensively today/tomorrow in a narrow circle of its most active and interested co-authors with the participation of four Nobel Laureates: Beatrice, Mairead, John and Ernesto.

This title will emphasize and highlight its key focus, its modern edge/spearhead/sting and the most urgent/important targeting of world civil society against the militaristic world nuclear order, hostile and deadly to humanity. As Dr. Lown, IPPNW Co-President wrote: "Nuclear weapons are the common enemy of humankind" and their preparation by the UN and governments during 75 years "has already plunged our lives into the ruins of the third world war." Humanity has lived for 75 years and tolerates these ruins as a humiliated hostage of genocidal terror!How long can we live in them and tolerate them when millions of people and children die every day from hunger, disease, and epidemics.

An atomic epidemic 75 years long in the absence of any vaccine against it (except ICAN) is incomparably more monstrous, dangerous, deadly, genocidal than the Covid-19 epidemic. Who will compare these two epidemics? Who could write 3-5-7 lines about this as the strongest and first epigraph of our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto? The strongest and the most inspired and enthusiastic would be the joint epigraph of our four outstanding Nobel Laureates: Beatrice, Mairead, John and Ernesto. We, the GHA and ICAN invite you as world anti-nuclear Nobel leaders to fulfill this honorable and historical mission, to write an epigraph comparing two global epidemics. Everything is learned in comparison! People, nations, the UN and governments are more likely to understand the danger of 85-year-old endless, no immune, frenzied, insane and financially fattest nuclear genocidal epidemic compared to the "childhood" partial and temporary "catarrhal" epidemic of Covid-19!

This comparison will be the best factual and intellectual humanistic argument in favor of the ICAN anti-nuclear movement and its "Anti-Nuclear Peace/Cybersferonics Manifesto".

What do you think of this comparison and epigraph to our Manifesto with its new title? Could we discuss its joint version of our four Nobel spiritual leaders? This would be their historical epigraph and the great anti-nuclear mission of our century.

With hope and love,



Dear Leo and all,

Thank you, for your post: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=952 in our GHA.

Concerning your question, “I wonder if WHO supported your IPPNW initiative” my answer is NOT YET.

You are absolutely wright saying “Humanity has lived for 75 years and tolerates these ruins as a humiliated hostage of genocidal terror!” I add, Now is time to change that!

Harmony and peace




My dear friend Leo,

Once again let me congratulate you o­n the much-needed strong GHA document against nuclear weapons. Since you ask me whether I have any corrections to the contribution attributed to me, I have a request. Would you please add at the end the words: "Readers may be interested in my book `A World Federation'". Also please add the following link to the book:


I would be extremely grateful if you could do this.

With many thanks, and with my very best wishes for your health,

John Avery



Dear Leo Semashko,

Please remove the quote attributed to Paul K. Chappell and me.


Rick Wayman

CEO, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation



Dear Leo

I just spoke with David Krieger and he would like for you to delete

the quote attributed to him as well.

Best wishes

Rick Wayman

CEO, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation



Dear Prof. Bishnu,

Many thanks for your amendment in your Manifesto thesis.

One question: could your add your great article about the Tribunals and the Hague Court criticizing them for the lack of punishment for the crime of producing, testing, developing and using nuclear weapons? Maybe you could write a small separate article of 3-4 pages about this for publication o­n our website? Is it possible for you? Thanks.

Best regards.



Dear Prof. Leo;

Many thanks for your kind suggestion of 4-5 pages doc of my 130th paper relating to nuclear weapons. Yes, I will send it by the end of August 2020.

Thanking you in advance.





My dear friend Leo,

Here is my response to your kind request for a comparison between the COVID-19 pandemic and the threat of an all-destroying thermonuclear war:

The COVID-19 pandemic is indeed a serious threat to human society. More than 600,000 people have already died from the disease, and this number may double or triple before vaccines or effective treatments are developed. However, I believe that thermonuclear war represents a far greater threat. Such a war would kill many hundreds of millions of people throughout the world, also in neutral countries. The victims would be of all ages, including babies, young people, adults and grandparents; and large regions of the world become permanently uninhabitable. Just as we have united against the pandemic, we must, with greater urgency, unite against nuclear weapons.”

With love and best wishes for health and safety to you and to my other GHA friends,

John Avery


Dear John and Anti-Nuclear Manifesto co-authors, friends,

Many thanks to John for his formulation of our Manifesto epigraph. Let me suggest a slightly different version: the key Appeal (below) of our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto from four of its co-authors - Nobel Peace Laureates (NGOs and persons). It will occupy the highest place in our Manifesto. This Appeal formulates the fundamental meaning of our Manifesto: world priority to ban nuclear weapons and build a global security/peace system.


We, the Nobel Peace Laureates (NGOs and persons),

Call the nations, governments, UN and Security Council to stop the 75 years world's movement towards nuclear death and to ban nuclear weapons! Can our reason, will, responsibility, humanism, conscience and human moral come to reconciliation with nuclear suicide, which has been generously funded by a seriously ill humanity during 75 years? How much money and attention we devote to the Covid-19 epidemic and how stingy and indifferent to the deadly nuclear epidemic.

We call to re-prioritize the humanitarian threat of the two epidemics and to focus of political will, science and funding o­n banning nuclear weapons and joint building a global security/peace system. Our Anti-Nuclear Manifesto is dedicated to this.

Beatrice Fin, Executive Director of ICAN, NGO Nobel Laureate 2017,

Mairead Maguire, Nobel Laureate 1976,

John Avery, Nobel Laureate 1995,

Ernesto Kahan, Vice President of IPPNW, NGO Nobel Laureate 1985

Do you agree with it? Do you support it? You could offer your editing this Appeal. I propose to discuss both versions in two days: today and tomorrow. Thank you for your active feedbacks. Best wishes for your health and peace in nuclear zero,



Dear Leo and all GHA members,

I thank you from the core of my heart for the congratulatory greetings o­n the occasion of the PMO Office, India, acknowledging receipt of GHAs very important GANDHICA Book.

It is the quest for universal peace and GHAs unwavering efforts to promote and establish GHAs Manifesto and Gandhica towards anti-nuclear Global Security/Peace Science to which I am

committed to, alike all our GHA members.

Regards and best wishes to o­ne and all,

Ashokchakravarthy Tholana,




Dear All,

Yes, I am agree with this proposal.

Thanks and Regards

Prof. Pravat Kumar Dhal

Magadh University, Bodhgaya,




Dear Leo.

Added my part of the analysis, which is already there in the main body of the document.

While referring to our "Manifesto of Peace/Cybersferonics” I would prefer to rely o­n Gandhi o­nly. Hence I prefer to add the gist of Gandhi`s reaction and his expression of agony while he learnt about the discovery of the nuclear weapon, To quote his own expression in his own words….

Thank you.

Maitreyee Bardhan Roy


Dear Maitreyee,

I completely agree with your addition and its separate publication, just behind your name, as long as you send the exact address and pages of the Gandhi quote o­n the Internet so that everyone can check it and make sure it is accurate and true. Could you please send the exact name of the source and, most importantly, its exact address o­n the Internet, for example, in 100 volumes of Gandhi Writings here (https://www.gandhiheritageportal.org/). Where to find it here? Could you find it and let us know? It is possible for you to do this quickly, in o­ne day, because we have run out of time before August 5th, when we must send our final Manifesto to the Hiroshima/Nagasaki 75th Anniversary. Do you understand this? Could we get your Gandhi source tomorrow? Thank. Best wishes for your health,




My dear friend Leo and other honored friends in the peace movement,

I agree that your version [Appeal] that reads ... is the most appropriate.

With great respect and admiration, and with very best wishes for your health and safety,

John Avery,



Dear Leo, Ernesto, Norman, Rudi, Beatrice, Bernard, Mairead, Pravat, John and all!

Ernesto's idea of fusing the awareness of Hippocratic Oath with our Manifesto Gandhica/Cybernetics is excellent. It is also extremely timely.

It is not just COVID-19, but the Health of the Planet is at stake. As Jan Oberg of Transnational Foundation (Lund, Sweden) puts it, Business as Usual is dead. And it is either co-existence or no-existence.

Leo speaks for all of us when he says about Ernesto’s suggestion: <https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=952). We all wonder with Leo <>

Perhaps, all international organizations, beginning with the UN, certainly the World Health Organization, should include in their statutes that their highest medical officials swear the Hippocratic Oath in a public ceremony. A similar requirement could be suggested for national level.

On a personal level, faced in the 2016 presidential election with the choice of Hilary Clinton or Donald Trump, I backed away and voted for the Green Parry’s Dr. Jill Stein. As RAGA’s president, I chose the o­ne who promised the best chance for improving US-Russia relations. I also liked her critical attitude to GMO, Wall Street, as well as her approval of whistleblowing dissidents and defectors, like Ed Snowden. Still, my choice was instinctually prompted by the awareness that the country needed a medical DOCTOR to heal its aggressive policy abroad and social, racial and inter-ethnic conflicts at home. It needed it then as a preventive measure. It needs medical attention now even more for healing and convalescence.

I think that Norman Kurland’s The Third Way option, ESOP etc also deserves public debate in the o­ngoing presidential campaign.

As the USA vs China relations are dangerously tense, I recommend Gordon Dumoulin’s alarming article “In times of Corona, history’s train is speeding up: Reboot humanity!” After all, the author lives in China and knows what he is talking about. https://transnational.live/2020/07/27/in-times-of-corona-historys-train-is-speeding-up-reboot-humanity/#comments

Our Manifesto Gandhica/Cybernetics follows in the footsteps of Manifesto of Survival posted in 2019 by a Russian-American friend of mine who appears under a sobriquet name of Anna Tolstoyevskaya, alluding to both Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky, the two Russian writers who promoted Non-Violence. “Our civilization has reached amazing heights of scientific and technical development, but we still have not learnt to see a human being in each other. And a friend. We are still throwing sticks and stones at o­ne another, except they have become so much bigger and heavier. Too heavy even for our planet.” RAGA Antidote 51 - Krasnow's Antiwar Newsletter: US Peace Memorial, LaRouche, UNAC, Assange , Jean Ranc, Lozansky, Telesur, George Callahan, Leo Semashko, .Manifest of Survival, Radio RADONEZH 6/8/2019 or https://counterinformation.wordpress.com/2019/05/19/manifesto-of-survival/

Finally, if the so called Homo sapiens seems complacent with the nuclear arms race which leaves o­nly 100 seconds o­n the doomsday clock, I hope that animal and flower lovers among us pay more attention to the AVAAZ warning that <it’s about to wreak havoc o­n wildlife>>. https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/bezos_billions_35/George...

In our effort to save Life o­n Earth, let’s never forget Mahatma Gandhi’s non-violence, always mindful that "The Satyagraha's goal is to convert, not to coerce, the wrong-doer.">>

Vladislav Krasnov (aka W George Krasnow), Ph.D., is the author of Solzhenitsyn and Dostoevsky: A Study in the Polyphonic Novel, Soviet Defectors: The KGB Wanted List, and Russia Beyond Communism: A Chronicle of National Rebirth. Since 1992 he has led Russia & America Goodwill Association www.RAGA.org. We are affiliated with the Global Harmony Association, founded by Dr. Leo Semashko to advance Gandhi’s ideal of Non-Violence. https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=938


W George Krasnow (http://wiki-org.ru/wiki/Краснов,_Владислав_Георгиевич)

President, RAGA



Dear Leo, John and all,

I feel very happy with our ICAN/GHA Antinuclear Manifesto. However, I have a delicate concern in relation with the comparison between the present Corona Virus epidemic and Nuclear Genocidal Weapons. I understand well the big economic and heath impact of the epidemic, which will not implicate the total destruction of life o­n Earth, as a “Nuclear Winter” following a potential comprehensive nuclear war, can produce. Probably, in o­ne year the present pandemic will be a past issue.

In every pandemic, especially when occurs in societies in crises, like the so called “Black Plague” in the Middle Ages and the “Spanish Flu” people ask existential questions. In the first case immediately after the epidemic appeared the "Renaissance or Humanism" in the arts, philosophy and commerce. Sea voyages reached the American continent and the most distant places o­n Earth and with it the founding of the European colonies, the slavery of the African peoples, a new monetary policy and the supremacy of capital.

After the Spanish Flu, Somehow related to these events, we must record the end of the Fist World War, the creation of the League of Nations in 1919.

Obviously, the present society is in a tremendous crisis. Never in their entire history were people as powerful as today to dominate nature and never were they so close to destroying themselves and nature itself. Until now, conflict resolution has tended to be made by hegemony, or in other words, by defeating the enemy. However, this way, in the current state of possession of genocidal weapons, is impossible, without generating an irreparable universal catastrophe. Thus, this is the time for a nuclear weapons elimination.

I suggest to add the word “weapons” in the name of this Manifest because otherwise, will include nuclear energy and medicine among other, and to save the difference between the peril of the epidemic and the nuclear genocide weapons.

Ernesto Kahan



Dear All,

Greetings! As per my feeling, both Nuclear weapon and Biological weapon (Covid19) are harmful to humankind. Each peace aspirant should restraint from it. Our honorable Nobel Laureates: Beatrice Fihn, Mairead Maguire, John Avery, and Ernesto Kahan are lover of peace and harmony. They have had synchronous view with G H A. We have to awake against both harmful weapons, which are destructible for civilizations. If we aspire positive, then Supreme will help us in His constructive way. May God bless us and provide right direction through awakening our consciousness!

Thanks and Regards

Pravat Kumar Dhal, PhD

Magadh University, Bodhgaya,




Dear Vladislav, Leo and all brothers for universal harmony and peace,

Our common work for a better, safe world is superb.




Dear Leo,

Many thanks and I agree to the publishing of the manifesto as agreed by John Avery and yourself.

Thank you for your work o­n this.




Dear Leo.

Here is the reference of my quote

My Life Is My Message” by M.K. Gandhi.

The weapon of violence, even if it is the atom bomb, becomes useless when it is matched against true non-violence.” (H, 1-6-1947, p.172)

Thank you.

Maitreyee Bardhan Roy



Dear Leo,

Sorry for the delay for my attached o­ne-pager o­n "Universal Capital Ownership Financing Reforms". I just finished it and hope you can include it in your Manifesto. Please feel free to use it in any way that furthers our common goals to unite all global citizens.

With highest personal regards,

Norman Kurland



Dear Leo,

I passed a very difficult week.

I am sorry for the delay. Tomorrow I shall send you my abstract corrected

Last night I had a very optimist meeting in the Town Hall of Ancient Ilis in the city of Amaliada. I met a doctor who just undertook responsible for culture.

I spoke him about us, our actions and visions. He is interested too much.

We need time. I shall make everything step by step informing you o­nly for any progress.

Ancient Ilis was the town, which restarted the old aces Olympics, o­n 770 b. C.

They were announcing the Olympics and controlled them.

I wish you good health.

With love




Hello, Leo,

Thank you for understanding my responsibility regarding Cyndy's care and my position about taking time for my own writing.

1. I am not comfortable changing the words of people other than yours, especially because those other writers have not asked me to edit their work. If you feel their words are unclear, I suggest that you send their writings back to them and ask them to clarify or ask them to find someone who speaks good English to help them. I think that a fair credit statement would be: "The English text written by Dr. Leo Semashko was edited by the writer Robert Weir."

2. Please do not add the additional statement about "only 12 times ...". I believe that number is incorrect. According to the web site you provided, it seems that a DoP bill was introduced either 99 or 100 times. I presume that you counted the number of times you saw the word "bill" and counted 12, including the five times by Dennis Kucinich. But then I presume that you also missed the number "Eighty-five ... bills" in the years 1955 to 1968.

· 1945: Representative Louis Ludlow (D-Indiana) re-introduced a bill to create a United States Department of Peace.

· 1946: Senator Jennings Randolph (D-West Virginia) re-introduced a bill to create a United States Department of Peace.

· 1947: Representative Everett Dirksen (R-Illinois) introduced a bill for “A Peace Division in the State Department”.

· 1955 to 1968: Eighty-five Senate and House of Representative bills were introduced calling for a United States Department of Peace.[5]

· 1969: Senator Vance Hartke (D-Indiana) and Representative Seymour Halpern (R-New York) re-introduced bills to create a U.S. Department of Peace in the House of Representatives and the Senate. The 14 Senate cosponsors of S. 953, "The Peace Act", included Birch Bayh (D-IN), Robert Byrd (D-WV), Alan Cranston (D-CA), Daniel Inouye (D-HI) and Edmund Muskie (D-ME). The 67 House cosponsors included Ed Koch of New York, Donald Fraser of Minnesota, and Abner Mikva of Illinois, as well as Republican Pete McCloskey of California.

· 1979: Senator Spark Matsunaga (D-Hawaii) re-introduced a bill to create a U.S. Department of Peace.

· 2001: Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) re-introduced a bill to create a U.S. Department of Peace. This bill has since been introduced in each session of Congress from 2001 to 2009. TOTAL OF FIVE BILLS It was re-introduced as H.R. 808 o­n February 3, 2009 and is currently supported by 72 cosponsors. In July 2008, the first Republican cosponsor, Rep. Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD) signed o­n.

· 2005: Senator Mark Dayton (D-Minnesota) introduced legislation in the Senate to create a cabinet-level department of peace a week after Dennis Kucinich introduced a similar bill in the House.

I will ask that you change the word "various" to "many" ("In the 20th century, many peace advocates in the US have attempted ...").

This is a good example of why I don't want to change the words of other writers without their knowledge and pre-approval. I don't want to risk introducing errors in their work.

3. Thank you. I will write the copy when my mind moves in that direction. The o­nly source for the DoP today is the Peace Alliance, which I mentioned in my copy. https://peacealliance.org/

4. Thank you.

5. I will promote the Gandhica and the Manifesto somehow. I still have to think about what I want to say to introduce your work. I will probably write something about how we met through John McConnell, working with you over the years, and my appreciation of your views and endeavors. I'll get to that when I get to it. Again, I have some other work and writing to do first.

6. Please send the finished Manifesto. I will not edit the words of your other contributors.

Robert Weir,



Dear Leo,

Kindly note that I will be sending my contribution latest by Monday please.

Had to take part in an urgent mediation sessions. Thanks for your understanding.






Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto:

Antinuclear Crown of the World Diamonds Synergy

Dear Norman,

I am inspired by the enthusiasm of your excellent in every way innovative scientific response (below), which demonstrates your deep understanding of the meaning and global significance of our Peace Manifesto. As the saying goes, an open-minded “sapienti sat / smart enough” to understand it and supplement it with a new, fundamental meaning of Kelso/Kurland economic equality: your achievements in it for 55 years give you every right to share this great paradigm with Kelso.

Economic equality is inaccessible to capitalism/communism, which deprived of any property, took away its legal right from 99% of the population, suppressing and ignoring it in every way. They turned out to be able o­nly to rob/exploit/impoverish the population, o­nly to increase economic inequality/abyss. They both are remained identical here that doomed them to collapse. But it is necessary and inevitable for the "Just/Spheral Third Way" (JSTW) of our Manifesto. You have become its fundamental theoretical contributor and its equal co-author.

JSTW recognizes the societal Gandhian spherons as the structural source of economic equality, the surplus value of which, created by them, provides the wealth of all peoples and reasonable property/ownership to each individual. Unfortunately, traditional political economy does not know/ignores this fundamental source of economic equality, because it does not even suspect the existence of spherons/varnas, known to Gandhi, who associated with them the economic revival of not o­nly India, but also humanity in a whole.

The idea of ​​spherons allowed him to be the first to begin to develop the fundamental concept of the "Economy based o­n love" of spherons, with the inalienable attributes of the JSTW: "Just Economy", "Economic Equality" and "Economic Nonviolence", starting since 1925 (http://gandhisevagramashram.org/pdf-books/my-religion.pdf, pp. 143-148; see also the GHA “Gandhica”, 2019: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848, pp. 161-163). It remains inaccessible to the Western/world economy for almost 100 years that makes it constantly crisis, disadvantaged for the population and doomed. o­nly Kelso and you have come close to the Gandhian economy of love, equality, non-violence and justice This colossal theoretical and practical issue we could discuss in detail later, in the economic chapter of the GHA new book "Gandhicracy" in September.

The importance of your economic equality paradigm is not limited to just o­ne sphere. It constitutes its holistic potential of all humanity/noosphere and its survival, without which global peace, overcoming economic conflicts, wars and economic causes of world militarism is impossible. Without a fundamentally grounded scientific perspective of the inevitable economic equality of Kelso/Kurland, it is impossible no ban o­n nuclear weapons, no general/complete disarmament and survival, like its other holistic potentials systematically presented in our Manifesto (paragraph 14.1.). It is, from my point of view, the most relevant global significance of your paradigm. But it, without synergy with others, will remain impossible/dead. You understood this well and joined the Manifesto co-authorship.

I was happy to translate your powerful intellectual contribution into Russian and publish it, for a start, o­n the corresponding pages of our Peace Manifesto here:

In English: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908

In Russian: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=819

The most valuable thing is that you inspired my reconstruction of the Manifesto's “cap”, which remained partial, fragmented and devoid of internal synergy. Together with your fundamental contribution, I saw how an ordinary “cap/top” of the Manifesto can/should be transformed into its “Antinuclear crown of the synergy of the world's intellectual diamonds” and become the semantic center of our Manifesto together with its respective co-authors. The prohibition of nuclear weapons, anti-nuclear focus is today a key, paramount problem of survival, which is relevant for every citizen and scientist, without exception that was brilliantly revealed by the leader of this movement (ICAN) Beatrice Fihn (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=943). My theoretical duty, I see, is to create the most convincing scientific anti-nuclear corona of our Manifesto, so that it becomes a large-scale conceptual instrument (strategic roadmap) for ICAN and puts the world's scientific achievements / diamonds at its service, ensuring its inevitable victory. The architecture and synergy of such diamonds has been formed for 15 years of the GHA's work. Now, we unconditionally recognize ICAN as their leader with all related organizations and their thinkers / theorists: IPPNW, Kahan, Kelso/Kurland, Wayman, Maguire, Galtung, Gandhi, Einstein, Wiener, Maturana, Vernadsky and others. We are convinced that their scientific synergy will undoubtedly overcome the resistance / misunderstanding of the ruling elites (1%) in banning nuclear weapons and upholding militarism, and will win support / recognition for the JSTW with an anti-nuclear goal among the population (99%).

In the coming days (or week, I am sick now) for discussion of all co-authors of the Manifesto antinuclear semantic crown its updated version will be presented to its co-authors with the key ideas of the contributors, whose documents I am now studying in search of the most expressive formulations. We would try to find consent in their central, semantic/value part, leaving aside the natural partial disagreements in the Manifesto detailed, theoretical part, which can be easily resolved in the future by step-by-step editing. The problem is not in them, but in the central, semantic part - in the Manifesto “crown”, which determines its humanistic, anti-nuclear value for the XXI century.

With love, deep gratitude and best wishes for health and creative success of global peace and ICAN,
Dr. Leo Semashko,

Dear Leo,

I loved your letter and the work that you and your colleagues in the Global Harmony Association have done for promoting a new paradigm that can unify all members of global society though universal moral, economic, and political principles that eliminate the roots of conflict at all levels of global society.

I've added with this email seven attachments to supplement the three I sent to you o­n July 8th evidencing the enormous respect I encountered when I was invited to Moscow for several weeks in the late 1980s from democratic-minded Russian political and academic leaders to explain how the Kelsonian Binary Economic paradigm and our Center's "Just Third Way" additions to Kelso's thoughts could solve basic economic root causes of poverty in Russia and throughout the world that lead to war. By the time I visited Russia, our CESJ team refined Kelso's paradigm, the following thought leaders: Marianist leader Fr. William Ferree, whose writings o­n Social Justice and Social Charity; Dr. Martin Luther King's search for a "people power personalist" paradigm beyond Communism and Monopoly; Buckminster Fuller and his advanced architectural designs for new cities and his refinement of Kelso's definition of the measurement of "money" as a "yardstick for measuring value" in all production and consumption transactions (e.g., Bucky suggested, as green energy systems continue to be advanced to cover the world, money values in economic transactions should be measured in the "Price of a Killowatt-hour", not gold or silver; and Garry Davis, who promoted "World Government of World Citizens" as well asa global central bank issuing "Mundos" as global money in his paper "Who Owns the World", which was based o­n Kelso's and CESJ's paradigm for global peace.

Louis Kelso and I worked together from 1965, when I worked as Director of Planning for the Citizens Crusade Against Poverty and then became executive director and his co-founder of the Institute for the Study of Economic Systems from 1968-1976. I also served as Kelso's legal and investment banking firm's Washington's Legal Counsel. I also designed an ESOP to save a union-organized globally famous lathe manufacturer was saved from bankruptcy. I also helped design the initial US Employee Stock Ownership (ESOP) laws in 1973 and 1984 that have enabled over 10 million American workers today to become capital owners, all conventional schools of economics ignore equality of ownership opportunity.

Despite the letters written to me to represent the Russian leaders I met with to seek support for Kelsonian privatizations in Russia from US government agencies, the State Department, USAID, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and U.S. political leaders, I found no enthusiasm to enable us to help Russia, despite my earlier success in developing the law that established the first ESOP in Egypt at the newly formed Alexandria Tire Company in 1968, in which workers acquired the large block of initial shares.

Now I know, thanks to your friend Vladislav Krasnov, why I was unable to work with the Russian leaders o­n their privatization problems.He brought to my attention the book Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe, 1980-1998, written by Professor Janine Wedel to explain the situation.One of the world's leading universities realized that Kelso's paradigm contradicted all conventional schools of economic thought (Keynesian, Chicago School, Austrian, Socialist, etc. The leaders of that U.S. university persuaded top Washington bureaucrats to supply Russia with millions of American tax dollars to convince Russian political leaders to ignore our ideas.

Our current team proposes the use of the same monetary, banking and tax reforms for ESOPs under our proposed Capital Homestead Act to enable every child, woman and man, from the poorest to the richest citizen, should receive equality of future capital ownership opportunity during every year of their lives. Just as adult citizens receive equality of voting opportunity for participating in a democratic political process, each citizen, as a consumer, should have an equal opportunity to participate and earn an independent income from their capital contributions to the production process in a free, just and competitive market system.To achieve such equality in ownership opportunities, each person, in a world economy where many jobs are being displaced by artificial intelligence, robotics, and advanced green energy and financing technologies, should receive equal future ownership opportunities,As proven by 100% worker-owned companies, equal citizen access to insured capital credit bank loans would enable each person to purchase new growth shares of well-managed corporations and cooperatives, repayable with the full stream of future profits in the form of tax-deductible corporate dividends.Eventually, when access to economic work disappears, citizen-owners whose capital earnings at least equal what they formally earned through salaries and wage incomes could then begin to afford to do what each person would love and choose to do, what Aristotle called "the work of civilization" (e.g., teaching, politics, medicine, invention, art, music, sports, etc. without being paid).

Leo, you asked for a o­ne-page paper. Please read the first attachment, "The Core Values of the Center for Economic and Social Justice." I believe that these values are consistent with the vision of your Global Harmony Association, as well as the Kelsonian paradigm.

Hopefully, the scholars working with you should also be interested in our work in establishing our global Justice University, which has been providing internet Zoom lessons without charge. (See the sixth attachment.)

When you have time, you should see our third attachment, "The Just Third Way: How We Can Create Green Growth, Widespread Prosperity and Global Peace."

Warm regards and highest respect for your relentless work for Global Peace,


Norman G. Kurland, J.D.

President, Center for Economic and Social Justice (CESJ)

P.O. Box 40711, Washington, DC 20016

(O) 703-243-5155, (F) 703-243-5935

(E) thirdway@cesj.org

(Web) http://www.cesj.org

(Personal) https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=414



Peace Manifesto External Discussion

Dear GHA members, friends,

After almost two months of work and polishing of our “Peace Manifesto from Cyberspheronics” (this is its last, but perhaps not the final name) with many new additions, corrections, editing by the American writer Robert Weir and epigraphs within the GHA framework, I am happy to send you its final version for external discussion in other organizations and for publication o­n other sites for the same purpose. I thank everyone who supported it and took part in its improvement. But work with it does not end, but o­nly begins with its entrance to the external arena.

I am happy to invite all its supporters to send it to the organizations, websites and networks accessible to you, including the most popular o­nes, this most important peace document of the 21st century, which we built in 15 years in the GHA o­n the basis of the fundamental cybernetic science “Cyberspheronics”, which is just another title for our “Global Peace Science”, created by 174 co-authors from 34 countries in 2016 (https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf).

It would be very valuable if you would accompany the distribution of our Manifesto with your introduction to its discussion, aiming it not at the details, but at a holistic, general, conceptual assessment of it with an answer to o­ne fundamental question: does the Cyberspheronics (Cybernetics of spheres/spherons or Third-Order Cybernetics) paradigm, presented in the Manifesto, deserve recognition and approval of its further development as a fundamental science of global peace? Yes or no?

Those who consider possible to recognize it right to life and development are invited to cooperate in it further research, application and promotion in accordance with its pragmatics. The first sign of this willingness to cooperate would be the author's epigraph to the Manifesto in 3-5 lines with a general assessment of the significance and prospects of Cyberspheronics. All epigraphs will be published in its updated version in 2 months, when it will be presented to members of the UN General Assembly in mid-September. A specific area of ​​cooperation within this paradigm will be identified with each in the process of individual contacts.

I thank in advance all the participants of these discussions, which, I am sure, will greatly stimulate the development of Global Peace Science, raising its scientific and social prestige.

All feedbacks from the discussions will be published o­n the GHA website “Peace from Harmony” o­n the Manifesto page: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908.

I am very grateful to all for supporting these discussions and facilitating them. Please, let me know if you plan to open your discussion of this historical peacemaking document within the framework of a fundamental innovative scientific paradigm.

With best wishes for your health and creative success.
Friendly, with love,

Dear CybCom Colleagues,

From the introduction: "The Manifesto Humanistic Essence is: Anti-nuclear, Anti-militaristic and Non-violent, based o­n the synergy of the holistic potentials of Gandhi, Wiener, Einstein and Vernadsky."

Attached is a manifesto from Leo Semashko. I am posting it at his request because Leo tells me he is persona non grata o­n CybCom. He would like to be reinstated as a contributor.

Leo invites answers to the question: Does the Manifesto of the Cyberspheronics paradigm (Cybernetics of spheres/spherons or as a form of Third-Order Cybernetics) deserve recognition, approval and its further development? Yes or no?

Leo is a Russian sociologist who has been developing his ideas for many years in virtual isolation. He is shunned by his fellow sociologists in Russia, who are mainly Marxist in orientation. As well as developing his theories, Leo, some 20 years ago, founded the Global Harmony Association (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=home), devoted to the pursuit of world peace, which has an international membership.

Increasingly in recent years, Leo has incorporated cybernetic concepts in his theorising. He would value some constructive feedback.


Bernard Scott,




Will there be a discussion? And if not, then why?

Dear Bernard,

Thank you so much for your brief but strong introduction to the discussion o­n our Peace Manifesto o­n the CybCom - Western cybernetics network. I posted your letter o­n the manifest page (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908). I am very grateful to you and greatly appreciate your concern for new cybernetic ideas. I am sure this will be a useful discussion for cybernetics, and useful for your group. Can I now, as a "persona non grata" write in it?

I hope that there will be at least 2-3 persons in it who will descend from the peak of their Western superiority and Russophobic racism to some unfortunate, beggar, clogged at homeland, self-proclaimed and unrecognized thinker. I wonder how right I will be in my sociological forecast? Here I am very pessimistic about and the Russians and the Westerners, but for various reasons.

But my rule is to use every chance to advance my “peace cybscience”, which I laid down my life. It is the fulfillment of the will of my heroic parents. My father was killed at 21 in the first days of the war in Grodno in June 1941, and my mother mourned him all life, and saved me (a baby) in weekly fascist bombings during the evacuation from Grodno, Western Belarus, where she lived with my father, lieutenant of the Red Army…

Therefore, I will carry out their testament until the last breath and go for it, for peace cybscience, excluding war, against any tank and machine gun, against any military/militaristic deadly force. I have been loyal for almost 50 years, ready to defend and give my life for the Gandhian "the greatest force of non-violence (spherons), more powerful than the most destructive weapon", for the soft peace-making force of spheral thinking/intellect.

Cybernetics is the best science for my peace science; therefore, I also call it “peace cybscience.” The fact that cybernetics is better than other sciences for peace, I was convinced of this at your will, at our first contacts 20 years ago, which I wrote to you many times about. I am very grateful to fate for our meeting 20 years ago…

However, the Western communities of cybernetics are also hostile, albeit secretly, to the peace cybscience, like the Russian o­nes, but in a different way. Therefore, I am ready to make an alliance with even the devil, like Faust, if he guarantees the advancement of this science either in the West or in Russia, where it is quietly cursed and chased, like the last dog, almost all.
Even those close to me turns away from me and are silent like strangers, obviously expecting the impending death of this madman who attacks at the almighty god of war/militarism so that he shut up with his useless non-monetary ideas of nonviolence/peace, from which they are tired…

Unfortunately, science and religion do not know the good/peaceful devil, and God is wisely silent and for a long, long time waiting for something. Maybe a nuclear end to put an end to the earthly tower of Babel and people? What is HE waiting for? What is His outcome for people? Peaceful or mortal? ...

Where can I get optimism between the Russian Marxist hammer (regardless of its maroon color up to Putin and its pink color at him) and the Western liberal anvil, which are identical in their admiration and fat feeding for their o­ne almighty god of militarism/war? Where and from whom, o­n which side to seek understanding and salvation in this tragedy, which I have been seeking for almost 50 years without success? Over these years, I have been convinced through the experience of all Russian and Western scientific and peacemaking communities that their traditional, militaristic, in essence, science and consciousness, deeply buried in oblivion, the great legacy of nonviolence/peace of Gandhi, Einstein, Wiener and Vernadsky (like a number of similar o­nes). They are sure that in a similar way they will bury and the legacy of their too zealous follower as Semashko. They did not have long to wait for this...

But enough of the sad things, I need and will move until my last breath with our Manifesto of peace cybscience.This is a question of my ethics of a scientist, which does not coincide with the traditional ethics of scientists...

I also thank you for your search recommendation of 'third order cybernetics', by which I find o­nly Lepsky's articles, long known to me. Do you personally know anyone from its other authors? I would be grateful if you tell me.
O­nce again, many thanks for your help and friendship.
Best wishes, with love,




Dear Leo,

Thank you Leo and all your family and friends for peace, harmony and disarmament in our world and your leadership towards fraternities among the people’s and all countries. Ending militarism and war is a wonderful purpose for us all to work towards, and the peace Manifesto is a shining light.

Peace and no killing,

Mairead Maguire,

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate

Web: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=678



Dear Leo,

I like to analyze your concepts…

COVID 19 has proved that the World state in the form of Globalization is not an end in itself, we have to proceed towards the universal goal where everybody will promote peace, happiness and world order … There will be virtual peace and happiness in the society will be no class structure in the universe, hence a uniform social structure will be the main aim of the GHA team. This is my understanding of the hemisphere and that will be our ultimate goal. I agree with your ideas.

Thank you.

Maitreyee Bardhan Roy





Ernesto Kahan



Dear Colleague,

It gives me great pleasure to inform you that for the first time in the history of the Lahore High Court Bar (LHCB), the President of the LHCB Association has constituted an International Peace and Democracy Forum of Lahore High Court Bar Association for year 2020-21. (Copy Attached)

All religions of the world preach similar truths and virtues, which, along with shared cultural and social values can be built upon to enhance interfaith harmony in Pakistan. Interfaith dialogue and harmony are possible o­nly o­n the basis of equality, respect and acceptance.

After independence in 1947, Pakistan was established as a parliamentary system based o­n elected forms of governance. However, the military has ruled for over three decades (1958-1971, 1977-1988, 1999-2008) instead and it has been difficult for a democracy to take root because of governing conflicts. The first five-year term of an elected government started in 2013 and 2018 signifies the first democratic transfer of power. However, civilian governments are subject to military influence and pragmatically accommodate the army in order to reduce the chances of a coup.

We want to learn from your experience and support you in the excellent work your organization does. Please feel free to contact us if you are interested in conducting training, workshop, seminar or a conference with Lahore High Court Bar Association.

We will be thankful if you could kindly include our name to your mailing list and inform us of any upcoming pieces of training, workshops, or conferences o­n human and minority rights and related topics arranged by you or any of your sister/partner organizations.

We look forward to a wonderful working relationship together and success for all concerned.

With best regards.

Waheed Ahmad

Advocate High Court

Human Rights Consultant

Chairman Child Protection Committee of Lahore Bar Association

Chairman of the International Peace & Democracy Forum of Lahore High Court Bar Association. (2020-21)

Cell # 0092-333-4639652 , 0092-300-4254329

Skype: waheedch1



BELLA Ventura,



Respected Dr. leo sahib,

Hope you are having a nice health and happy life.

I appreciate your efforts for peace and harmony. May God bless us to achieve the goals.

With regards and best wishes,

Dr Noor Muhammad Larik



Congrats to Leo and the GHA.

María Cristina Azcona




Admirable dr Leo and all!


Susana Roberts


Поздравляю с успешным окончанием Манифеста Мира из Киберсфероники.

За прошедших два месяца, была проделана огромная, очень сложная работа.

Конечно Манифест Мира из Киберсфероники заслуживает признания,

одобрения и дальнейшего развития как фундаментальная наука глобального мира.

Я говорю Да.

Вера Попович




Grata, por me oportunizar,participar destes momentos.

Delasnieve Daspet



De Mr. Leo :

Caros membros da GHA, amigos,

Depois de quase dois meses de trabalho e aperfeiçoamento do nosso “Manifesto de paz da cibersfera eletrônica” (este é o último, mas talvez não o nome final), com muitas novas adições, correções, edição do escritor americano Robert Weir e epígrafos no quadro da GHA, Fico feliz em enviar a sua versão final para discussão externa em outras organizações e para publicação em outros sites com a mesma finalidade. Agradeço a todos que o apoiaram e participaram de sua melhoria. Mas o trabalho com ele não termina, mas apenas começa com sua entrada na arena externa.

É com satisfação que convido todos os seus apoiadores a enviá-lo para as organizações, sites e redes acessíveis a você, incluindo os mais populares, este documento de paz mais importante do século XXI, que construímos em 15 anos na GHA com base da ciência cibernética fundamental "Cyberspheronics", que é apenas mais um título para a nossa "Global Peace Science", criada por 174 coautores de 34 países em 2016 (https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science- 2016.pdf).

Seria muito valioso se você acompanhasse a distribuição de nosso Manifesto com sua introdução à discussão, visando não aos detalhes, mas a uma avaliação holística, geral e conceitual do mesmo, com resposta a uma pergunta fundamental: a Cyberspheronics Paradigma (cibernética das esferas / spherons ou cibernética de terceira ordem), apresentado no manifesto, merece reconhecimento e aprovação de seu desenvolvimento posterior como uma ciência fundamental da paz global? Sim ou não?

Aqueles que consideram possível reconhecê-lo como direito à vida e ao desenvolvimento são convidados a cooperar nele com mais pesquisas, aplicações e promoções, de acordo com suas pragmáticas. O primeiro sinal dessa vontade de cooperar seria a epígrafe do autor para o Manifesto em 3-5 linhas, com uma avaliação geral da importância e perspectivas da ciberesfonia. Todas as epígrafes serão publicadas em sua versão atualizada em 2 meses, quando serão apresentadas aos membros da Assembléia Geral da o­nU em meados de setembro. Uma área específica de cooperação dentro desse paradigma será identificada com cada uma no processo de contatos individuais.

Agradeço antecipadamente a todos os participantes dessas discussões que, com certeza, estimularão muito o desenvolvimento da Ciência da Paz Global, aumentando seu prestígio científico e social.

Todos os feedbacks das discussões serão publicados no site da GHA “Peace from Harmony” na página do Manifesto: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908.

Sou muito grato a todos por apoiar essas discussões e facilitar suas discussões. Por favor, deixe-me saber se você planeja abrir sua discussão sobre este documento histórico de consolidação da paz dentro da estrutura de um paradigma científico inovador fundamental.

Com os melhores votos de sua saúde e sucesso criativo.

Delasnieve Daspet




Dear Professor Leo and Peace Colleagues;

Greetings from Nepal!

Congratulations to you all for your grand success of this Peace Manifesto from Cyberspheronics.

Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

Bishnu Pathak,



Dear Leo,
I do not know if your messages will be accepted o­n CybCom.
I do not like your reference to "the peaks of their Western superiority". This is churlish and unwarranted. CybCom members have a variety of backgrounds. They are scientists, each with differing interests but with a shared interest in cybernetic ideas. Expect any scientist to be sceptical, if you assert dogmatically that you have a unique claim to truth in your ideas. Modesty is o­ne of the highest virtues (Confucius).
Remember Scott's Laws: 1. there is always a bigger picture; there is always another level of detail; there is always another perspective; there is always error; there is always the unexpected.
I find this statement disturbing, "But I am ready to make an alliance with the devil, like Faust, if he guarantees the advancement of this science." As a Christian, you should never deny your God. Say your prayers. I will pray for you.
As for third order cybernetics, did you search Google in English?
Best regards,
Dear Leo,
I hope you find some peace. The eternal God is beyond our understanding. Seek Him and he will reveal Himself.
All negative thinking and feeling is a waste of energy. Here I include anger, bitterness, self-pity and pessimism. Feed yourself o­n the words of the great teachers.
I have little interest in third order cybernetics. Many theorists invoke a third (or higher) order cybernetics and do say in a variety of ways. Of this possibility, although it may be done, von Foerster states, “It would not create anything new, because by ascending into ‘second-order’, as Aristotle would say, o­ne has stepped into the circle that closes upon itself. o­ne has stepped into the domain of concepts that apply to themselves” (von Foerster, 2003, p. 301). I attach the source document.
When I googled 'third order cybernetics', I came across these links.
Best wishes,

Dear Leo,

In my opinion your recent letter to all and sundry is most unfortunate. You do not write as a scientist writing to fellow scientists. You mix up your message with polemic and politics.

Despite my warnings, you refer to"Western superiority and Russophobic racism." Such language is divisive and contradicts all you say about working for harmony.

Likewise your reference to 'a pact with the devil' is in appalling taste. You have made a mockery of my attempts to give your ideas a hearing within the CybCom community. You have damaged your own reputation and, likewise, damaged mine.

I do not wish to receive any more messages about your 'manifesto'.




Ditto! Good for you Bernard!

With my respect and love,




Dear all,

I am joining Bernard.





Дорогой Лев Михайлович!

Увы, думаю, что Вы правы в низкой оценке нынешнего духовного состояния российской интеллигенции, но не хотелось бы рассылать это мнение на весь мир. Боюсь, что это- последствие массового грехопадения наших прадедов в 1917 году, когда насилие было провозглашено законом науки и главным рычагом облегчения жизни простого народа в России и даже во всём мире (посмотрите на герб СССР!). Интеллигенции особенно трудно это признать и раскаяться и искать новые нравственные рычаги прогресса, как Ваша "кибер-этика."...

Думаю, что преодолевать преграды нам Господь завещал!



W George Krasnow (http://wiki-org.ru/wiki/Краснов,_Владислав_Георгиевич)

President, RAGA



Dear Leo and Bernard,

Unfortunately, no nation in today's world promotes Article 17 of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which reads:"Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. No o­ne shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property."

Please check out the Platform of the Unite America Party at http://www.uniteamericaparty.org .It offers "Economic Personalism" (a universally person-empowering paradigm beyond the power-concentrating paradigms of "Monopoly Capitalism" o­n the political right and all forms of "Socialism-Communism-Collectivism" o­n the political left. In my opinion, the Platform offers a missing agenda for our common goal of world peace.

The key is a new money system that democratizes access to insured capital credit from central banks, and local commercial and cooperative banks that enables every child, woman and man -- from the poorest to the richest -- to receive an equal credit allocation to purchase new full-dividend payout voting growth shares of well-managed production and services enterprises. The new money for purchasing new growth shares would be backed by the land, other natural resources, advanced green energy systems, artificial intelligence, automated technologies, infrastructure and energy systems needed by productive enterprises to meet the consumer goods and services of 21st century global market-based growth. The bank loans would be repaid from "future savings" from the full stream of future annual profits earned from the enterprises issuing each of the shares, free from corporate taxes. Where enterprises fail, capital credit feasibility charges added by capital credit insurance companies when the loans were first purchased would restore any new money created by lender banks and central banks under the new monetary system.The end result is a non-inflationary new and more democratic market economy, strengthening of private property rights and new opportunities for economic power and incomes to shift from the State or the .01% of wealthiest citizens in today's world to all citizens, without depriving current capital owners of their property rights during their lives.

Please visit our "global library" at www.cesj.org for books, articles, videos and accomplishments from the 55 years I first learned of this "Just Third Way" paradigm presented in books by San Francisco lawyer and investment banker Louis O. Kelso. Other giant 20th century thinkers with whom I met or worked with who were supportive of Kelso's paradigm was Pope John Paul II, Ronald Reagan; Hubert Humphrey; leading tax legislator Russell Long; leader world design scientist Buckminster Fuller; Great Books philosopher and co-author of Kelso's first two books Mortimer J. Adler; Marianist leader and head of Dayton University William Ferree; Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.; and Garry Davis (founder of "World Government of World Citizens" following WWII). There was also strong interest in Kelso's ideas from the Mikhail Gorbachev Foundation after he resigned from leadership of the USSR.

Please feel free to call me if you have any thoughts about the humanistic soundness of Economic Personalism.

Respectfully yours,

Norm Kurland

Norman G. Kurland, J.D.


Center for Economic and Social Justice (CESJ)

P.O. Box 40711, Washington, DC 20016

(O) 703-243-5155, (F) 703-243-5935

(E) thirdway@cesj.org

(Web) http://www.cesj.org

"Own or be owned."


Peace/Cyberspheronics Manifesto:

Kelso's Economic Ownership Addition

Dear Norman,

I am very happy and grateful for your constructive response and fundamental, ingenious contribution to our “Peace Manifest from Cyberspheronics” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908).

There was a gap of economic property/ownership, which I did not know how/whereby to close, and which you brilliantly filled with the idea of ​​dual ownership of Louis O. Kelso. This idea harmoniously fits into the Cyberspheronics paradigm of the four cybernetic (circular / direct / feedback) societal spherons of society and the corresponding equal spheral/necessary property rights (possession/own, use, disposal) of person/humanity. They are different in source / origin / foundation, but they are united/one in their societal necessity/synergy with all the differences in their implementation through the whole spectrum of individual abilities/needs of each person.

Four spheral cybernetic property rights/ownerships of person/humanity in Cyberspheronics:

1. From God: to be born and have the right to give birth, create children and own / care for them, as well as the right to receive their care in the sociosphere as a sociospheron. It is the right of humanitarian property within the framework of social autopoiesis of a human/social individual.

2. From society: to be thinking and thinking, have the right to think, to own self thoughts, take care of them, use and dispose them in the infosphere as an infospheron. It is the right of intellectual property within the framework of social autopoiesis of human/social information.

3. From society: to be governed / united / subordinate / partnering / organized by other people and have the right to manage/govern, unite, subordinate, partnership, organize other people in the orgsphere as an orgsferon. It is the right of organizational/political ownership within the framework of social autopoiesis of human/social/political organization/governance/management.

4. From society: to be economically/financially/materially secure/well-off and to have the right to economic property (to create, own, use and dispose of) material goods, things/services) in the technosphere as technospheron within the framework of social autopoiesis of human/social things, material goods/things.

(I systematically/cybernetically analyzed the spheral blocks of the needs, abilities, property and its rights of an individual in a separate paragraph 2.10., in a first approximation, almost 20 years ago, in my book Tetrasociology: Responses to Challenges, 2002: https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/2-1_eng.pdf, стр. 35-39).

Four spheral/societal property rights are also synergetic and cybernetic (circular in direct / feedback), like spheres/spherons of social autopoiesis (social reproduction) of person/humanity as a whole.

This is the general structural/model outline of Cyberspheronics, in which you and Kelso fill in the necessary niche of economic ownership and related human right. To the potentials of the societal/cybernetic integrity of Gandhi, Einstein, Wiener, Maturana and Vernadsky, updated in our Manifesto, you and Kelso complement the equally necessary economic societal integrity.

It acquires special significance in view of the historical antagonism and violent confrontation of its two forms/parts: private and public property. Their natural synergy/harmony in social evolution was transformed (made a bifurcation) into antagonism, violence, militarism and wars of two monistic, equally hostile/irreconcilable ideologies and political systems of capitalism and communism/socialism. Each of them has been striving for centuries for world domination and forcible affirmation of its own world order, both of which are genetically damaged, inferior and pathological.

Their militaristic confrontation led humanity until 100 seconds (Mecklin, 2020) to the very edge of complete nuclear genocide/ecocide, to the complete extinction of human. This proves the historical inconsistency of these two equal (with all their differences) pathological political and economic systems and paths of evolution. This proves the historical necessity and inevitability of the transition/bifurcation to the THIRD WAY of development, which Kelso, Gandhi, Einstein, Wiener, Maturana and Vernadsky predicted with ingenuity. This historical necessity/inevitability has been theoretically/synergistically comprehended in the GHA Cyberspheronics during 15 years with your participation in it all this time, finally and lapidary expressed in our Manifesto.

In connection with this and o­n the basis of this, we invite you to take part in our Manifesto, supplementing paragraph 7 “Spheral Third Way” (or another) with the corresponding paragraph (approximate title): “Harmonious/Just Kelso’s Economic Ownership” in short half page text with your signature. This your fundamental contribution will make you a full co-author of our Manifesto if you want it and if you consider it necessary and responsible to do so.

You are absolutely right that without the recognition and approval of Kelso’s economic ownership, it’s impossible to achieve global real peace and overcoming the traditional, insoluble economic antagonisms. Your synergetic fundamental contribution will fill this gap of the Peace Manifesto and will be useful to everyone: to you with your economic theory, and to all other spheral holistic potentials of integral Cyberspheronics.

Do you agree to make this contribution? When could you send your short text up to 1 page for our discussion? Thank you so much for it.
Friendly, with best wishes for your health, success and peace,


Dear Norman,

Thank you very much for calling our attention to Louis O Kelso (1913- 1991) and his ideas about a Third Way between Capitalism and Communism, between unrestrained money-hunting and lack of personal freedom, including private enterprise. Actually. Kelso's Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) was enacted in the USA.

I think there was a good chance for his ideas being adopted in Russia after the collapse of the USSR. However, the US meddled o­n behalf of neoliberal "shock therapy" reforms which degenerated into the rule by oligarchs. I have described it in my 2006 article Would Harvard Ever Help Russia? Professor Janine Wedel wrote a whole book about the team ofHarvard's "assistance":Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe, 1989-1998/

For a Russian version of the above events see my article: Владислав Краснов"Как медведя обучали" на сайте ПЕРЕПРАВА

According to Wikipedia, In the United States, there is a widespread practice of employee stock ownership. It began with industrial companies and today is particularly common in the technology sector but also companies in other industries, such as Whole Foods Market and Starbucks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_stock_ownership

What I am saying is that there need to try to advance Kelso's ideas right now both in Russia, and the USA, and world-wide.

Once again, thank you, Norman, for reviving Kelso's and other peoples' ideas for implementing the Third Way, includingthe Platform of the Unite America Party at http://www.uniteamericaparty.org before next Presidential election.


W George Krasnow (http://wiki-org.ru/wiki/Краснов,_Владислав_Георгиевич)

President, RAGA, www.raga.org





Personally, it sounds like deep and powerful esoteric to me. In the sense that it promises a lot, it talks about solving all problems and talks about powerful (half-secret) instruments. In fact, I do not mean the science criteria settlement (I do not know if it is most important now), more important for me is the lack of inquiry in this manifesto and his background. Ex: In political science, it was discovered a long time ago that too powerful weapons inhibit conflicts directly (replacement wars o­nes are being created or they are becoming a purely informational and economic domain). It is not possible to abstract "spherons" and treat them as coherent, with great autonomy, having a real mapping as independent (in analogy to many social systems that will rather meet these assumptions, and which spherons will not meet). I would also be afraid that this (manifesto) in itself by accident is not an instrument of information struggle (in the sense of infecting with the wrong focus of the minds of researchers). Personally, I feel these theories as infantile and destructive.


Mariusz Żabiński ,




I agree with you Mariusz,

I am aware of “the manifesto” some time ago and had the same kind of wonderings.

There is implicit guilt-by-association of Western Liberals and the described concept of Third Order Cybernetics strikes me as a God-like overarching authority.


Faisal L. Kadri, PhD

Email: flkadri26@gmail.com,


Tel. +514 714 7877



I find it hard to see and understand the content and the ideas in the manifesto. It seems to identify four realms and asserts that using this identification in some way (or doing some sort of statistics o­n its basis?) "guarantees humanity equality, justice, peace, love, brotherhood, freedom, non-violence and happiness of all peoples in their harmony". I didn't see anything that spoke to a social practice in which different ways of living are enacted in concrete situations. Things I am not following include: (1) I don't see how any sort of "science" guarantees anything; (2) if a system has a quality (like harmony), it does not mean that the parts of that system have the same quality - so "world harmony" does not mean that harmony exists at all levels of the world; (3) as soon as someone says harmony, my first thought is "harmony for who?"...

ben sweeting




Hello Bernard and Leo

I have just become engaged in your messages below and other musings

I found as others have that there are esoteric dimensions beyond my understanding.

However, some elements resonate with the Yin ~ Yang philosophy of ancient China?

Bucky Fuller created the term Tensegrity to describe such relationships as posted o­n the webpage you citedin regards to: "2.1 Definitions - 1 The CYBS Science” that refer to: simultaneously observed/observing and governed/governing within their circular causality, consciously organizing its object/subject and consciously self-organizing as its actor according to the measure/level of their knowledge.

As Raul reminded me Stafford Beer was inspired by Tensegrity to develop Syntegrity! His work is described by Espinosa, A. & Hardin, R. (2007). ‘Team syntegrity and democratic group decision-making: theory and practice’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58: 1056-1064, August,


The reference to Spherons possessing "chaos and ensuring its stable regularity” also resonates with the word coined by the founding CEO of VISA International He described the organisational architecture of VISA as “Charordic” by combining the words “Chaos” and “Order”. Refer to: Hock, D (1995) ‘The Chaordic Organization: Out of Control and Into Order’, World Business Academy Perspectives, 9(1) p.7, .


Hock apparently was not familiar with the concept of Holons coined by Koestler. A defining feature of holons is their dual contrary~ complement characteristics. The tilde “~” symbol was introduced by Kelso, J. A. S. & Engstrøm. D. A. (2006) The Complementary Nature, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Harvard cell biologist Donald Ingber describes Tensegrity aka "Charordic”. as "The architecture of life”. Refer to Ingber, D. E. (1998) ‘The architecture of life’, Scientific American, pp. 30-39, January,Quantum physicist Davie Bohm describes Tensegrity as anintrinsic property of the universe. I mapped this out in Table 3.8 “Holarchy: Hierarchy of Holons” o­n page 130 of my PhD dissertation posted at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=858244.

I have now hypothesised that Tensegrity is the driving force of evolution with future evolution dependent up any new emergent entity reproducing this characteristic. I see Tensegrity as both a manager of complexity and a driver of complexity.

If these thought generate any comments I may not respond until after presenting my global webinar next Wednesday o­n “The case for radical reform of corporate governance”. Free registration is available at https://www.grfcg.in/

This month I also have a cover story published in hard copy by The European Financial Review o­n “Rebuilding infected economies: Without deficits, debt or taxes" also posted at: https://www.europeanfinancialreview.com/rebuilding-infected-economies-without-deficits-debt-or-taxes

Cover of print edition:

Kind regards


Shann Turnbull PhD; Principal: International Institute for Self-governance

PO Box 266, Woollahra, Sydney Australia, 1350

Ph:+612 9327 8487; Cell: +61 (0) 418 222 378

Skype and Google ID: shann.turnbull

Bibliography/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MJjAJXa1k5fhP2dNo3ze0eBUoU5qUJ2S/view?usp=sharing




Dear Shann,

Thank you for your interesting comments.

Leo is very much the creator and owner of his theory. I merely responded to his request to post his manifesto o­n CybCom for discussion. Leo is no longer a member of CybCom.I suggest that you, or any other CybCom colleague who wishes to communicate with Leo, shouldemail him directly at leo.semahsko@gmail.com.





Congratulation to Leo and GHA!

Takis Ioannides,




Dear friends


Thank you sooo much for your email; Sooo happy!!!

Nepal´s problem is also going o­n very high now, just like a rocket... Quarantine! Death! Suicide cases! and many more. OMG!!! We have over 4 months total lock down! How to survive???

However, we should believe in our own inner power. Its the time to be more Positive, Creative, Productive and Cooperative... Trying my best to give various programs to different sectors at national, international level through webinar for awareness, consciousness and selfless serve...

Pls keep in touch. Namaste to all of your family and friends. Smile!!!


CM Yogi


Peace Service USA | Spreading Spiritual Awareness Globally




Final Manifesto, Birthday and Future Agenda

TO: Ms. Mairead Maguire, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate

Dear Mairead,

Thank you very much for your warm birthday greeting, which was published along with 37 similar o­nes from 19 countries here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=649. I also heartily thank all others for their warm congratulations.

Along with this, you supported our final “Spherons/Humanity Manifesto XXI” as a Manifesto of peace, love, harmony and non-violence of our century, offering the Third Way, alternative to all militaristic systems of the past that lead humanity to the very edge of the global nuclear disaster 75 years after the World War II and Victory over fascism. For more than a month of discussion and corrections, it found the support of 30 GHA members from 16 countries, the responses of which are published together with your o­n the final Manifest page here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908

I am sincerely grateful to you and all for your strong support, which demonstrates the urgent need in strong, fundamental scientific alternative to the militaristic threat of the “shameful self-destruction" of humankind and the biosphere.

Of course, our Manifesto is far from perfect, but it offers an alternative to the shameful impotence, both intellectual and political, before the dictatorial militaristic Damocles sword of modernity, before which humanity is like a lamb o­n the scaffold. Our Manifesto is a strong mental protest against the dictatorship of militarism, to the protest of which you make a powerful contribution.

I am happy to send everyone the final Manifesto in the attachment (see also its web publication) with o­ne agenda for the future: to translate it into other languages ​​and publish it as widely as possible with a view to its further discussion and promotion to new public organizations and political structures, including the UN. We can and must shift by this Manifesto the question of a fundamental alternative to deadly militarism and its accelerating race of nuclear supersonic weapons from a dead center. There is nothing more to do. The pacifist calls are dead and degenerated; they do not interfere in any way with militarism and the arms race, which o­nly mock pacifist attempts. We can no longer live into non-alternatively doomed, shameful, and humiliating 75-year-old status quo of sheep o­n the scaffold ofmilitarism. Humanity can no longer be held hostage to terrorist militarism o­n its scaffold. It requires not o­nly intelligence, but also a strong will and courage, which you, Mairead, have been vividly demonstrating since 1976, when you boldly stopped the brutal terror in Belfast. Therefore, we very much hope for your strong promotion of our Manifesto, which will be an example of civil responsibility for peace for others.

With love and gratitude,



Dear Leo
Many thanks to and all your family for your lives and great leadership in
The service of love, nonviolence, harmony and peace the path to building
a new humanity and happy world.
Mairead Maguire
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
North Ireland,


Spherons Manifesto Final:

discussion/approval by June 21

Dear GHA members, friends,

In search of a satisfactory form and measure, after numerous discussions and reflections, for the fifth time I rewrote our “Spherons Manifesto” (20 pages), preserving its key content. In this regard, I am happy to present to you for final discussion and approval in 2 days, until June 21 inclusively, an updated version of the Manifestoin the attachment and published here:


It takes into account and saves all the support voices in the previous discussions, starting from May 17. During the month of discussion, the Manifesto did not meet a single objection in principle, but many (19 from 12 countries) positive comments published with it. Therefore, your silence will be a sign of consent, so as not to be repeated. Final amendments to the Manifesto will be made only o­n the basis of your feedback.

Our Manifesto is the shortest synopsis of our Gandhica in its practical refraction, both scientific and political/business. This is our most worthy intellectual peacemaking result in 15 difficult years of searching. This is the GHA's best farewell gift for Global Harmony Day o­n June 21, with which I am happy to congratulate you, and o­n my birthday o­n June 20.

I am happy to thank all the GHA members and its friends, who have remained faithful to it and its mission: Global Peace from Spherons Harmony, who supported it and contributed to it! As I reported, after the completion of the GHA last book: “Gandhicracy” at the end of the year, from January I completely switch to spheral business, to the pragmatism of our Manifesto as a guide to action. I will report o­n this in detail later, at the end of the year.

With love, best wishes for health and peace from harmony,




Dear Leo,

I would like to wish you a very happy Birthday.

I hope you have a wonderful day with your family.

Thank you for all you do for peace and harmony in the world.

Warmest wishes,

Mairead Maguire,

Nobel Peace Laureate,

North Ireland,




Dear Leo:

I approve the Manifesto. Great work. Thank you.

Best wishes,

Your Rudi from the House of Mir,

Prof. Rudolf Siebert,

Michigan University,




Уважаемый Лео, друзья, доброго всем здоровья на весь век!

Уточненный и утвержденный Манифест надо опубликовать и в моём журнале. (см. прикрепление).
Аудитория должна знать об этом документе, об его авторах, предыдущих выпусках на портале Лео.

Надеюсь на посылку и в мой адрес окончательного варианта текста Манифеста.

Спасибо, друзья.

С уважением,

Владимир Иванович Оноприенко,

Главныйредакторжурнала «Ноосфера»,



Dear Leo and all, this manifesto is excellent.

I approve it, obviously

Prof. Emeritus Dr. Ernesto Kahan, MD University Professor - Poet – Physician

Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Global Harmony Association (GHA) - Laureate "World Creator Harmony",

Academician - Real European Academy of Doctors. International Editorial Board,

Academician - International Academy of Sciences, Technology, Education and Humanities (AICTEH),

Academic Director of Health Courses - Galilee Institute,

1st Vice President - World Academy of Arts and Culture – WAAC/WCP



Dear Leo, I approve it.

With peace via nonviolence and harmony

Takis D Ioannides,



I approve the Manifesto, which is excellent.

María Cristina Azcona,



Yes from my side.

Thank you so much Prof Leo for your hard works in this endeavors.

Bishnu Pathak,



Yes, approved.


Pravat Kumar Dhal, PhD



Дорогой Лев Михайлович!

Дорогой Лев!

С Днём Рождения!

Желаю тебе здоровья, энергии для продолжения твоего благородного пути по созиданию Глобальной Гармонии в мире!!!

Пусть твои мудрые мысли доходят до сердец наибольшего числа людей во всех странах!

Пусть российский менталитет перестраивается под формат Глобальной Гармонии ГСГ!

Счастья и любви тебе!!!

Кубок тебе - в знак Победы Гармонии и Разума над безумием и войной в мире!

Большой привет Вере Ивановне!

Твоя Нина Новикова



Dear Leo,

I am glad to join those who have already signed your noble Manifesto. I am especially happy to do so that this coincides with your 79th birthday. So I wish you many healthy, happy and productive years ahead. However, in good faith, I wish to suggest removing o­ne short paragraph <<prehistoric India, which provided it with prosperity and world cultural leadership for a millennium, intuitively used by him in the practice of non-violent liberation of India from colonial slavery, become through the CYBS the scientifically conscious property of all

humanity. They open before it the Era of true being in the conscious realm of harmony, peace, equality, partnership service, love and non-violence of all nations.>>

After talking with you o­n the phone, I understand your desire to connect your spheron theory with the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi in a conceptual way. However, Gandhi's own attitude to the varnas system of ancient India was more complex than just accepting without question.

For reference, just read this recent article by an Indian scholar who is generally approving of Gandhi's Non-Violence.

In Good Faith: Gandhi and the varna question

It is easy to cherry-pick from his writings to paint him a racist and anti-Dalit. But Gandhi’s views evolved, reflected his ethical project.

Written by K.P. Shankaran | Updated: February 25, 2019 12:55:07 am


I am sure that without the above short paragraph, your eloquent pro-Peace and pro-Harmony Manifesto will serve even its better its noble purpose.

o­nce again, thank you for your leadership o­n a Happy 79th birthday.


W George Krasnow (http://wiki-org.ru/wiki/Краснов,_Владислав_Георгиевич)

President, RAGA, www.raga.org



Dear Vladislav,

I am very grateful to you for the strong support of the Spherons Manifesto. But there is o­ne very sensitive phrase in your letter in Russian: “You illegally connect your modern theory of spherons with the traditional caste system of ancient India, to which the Mahatma himself was ambiguous.” (In the English answer, you formulate it a little differently.) As proof, you refer to the article by Professor of the University of Delhi K. Shankaran, “In Good Faith: Gandhi and the varna question”.

I carefully studied this article, translated it into Russian, published it in two languages ​​in the section “Discussions about Gandhi” (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=862 and http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=799) and provided it with a brief comment. The question of varnas and castes is the most complex and difficult in the legacy of Gandhi. Its complexity is determined by both the history of the subject itself and the history of Gandhi's views o­n them. The historical difficulty lies in the fact that Varnas existed in ancient Indian society as equal social groups that divided the entire population into four clusters that lived in peace and harmony and ensured the prosperity and world cultural leadership of ancient India over the millennia of its life, which is reflected in the numerous Vedas.

For the millennium of social equality of Varna was followed the millennium of their evolutionary deformation and their transformation into a hierarchical caste system. Gandhi's views also evolved from a partial recognition of the value of the caste system in Hinduism to its complete denial and rejection of Hinduism o­n this issue. By 1927, he firmly and without hesitation distinguished them, in every possible way praised equal Varnas as the universal law of the revival of humankind and completely rejected castes as a "monster" and social ugliness, which he considered the cause of extreme poverty and decline of India.

Professor Shankaran defends this point of view, protecting Gandhi from numerous falsifications, representing him as a racist and “casteist”, who identified castes and varnas. This is a gross distortion and falsification of Gandhi, which cannot be acceptable to any honest scientist who has studied the works of Gandhi and does not judge them firsthand. This is the subject of my comment below. I hope it convinced you of the unfoundedness of your accusation that I “unlawfully bind them.” Following Gandhi, I associate spherons with equal varnas, but I have never connected, like Gandhi, spherons/varnas with castes.

Best wishes for your health and peace from the Gandhian varnas/spherons harmony,


Дедушка, я с тобой частично согласна.

Тему Манифеста нужно затрагивать в университетах и прочих ВУЗах. Мне было трудно осознать его,

но часть я поняла. Могу сказать, что это невозможно, но попытаться стоит. Всегда будет насилие, воины, презрение одной расы другими, всегда будет тот, кто выше остальных.

С любовью,

Полина Семашко, 14 лет,



Всем доброго времени суток.

'Манифест сферонов’ поддерживаю и утверждаю.Идеи и теории, описанные в манифесте,

близки мне по духу. Особенно идеи разоружения для сохранения жизни человечества и планеты; "честная" демократия и политика в целом.И еще многие идеи, изложенные в манифесте.

С уважением,

Семашко Андрей,



Dear Leo,

Yes, I approve the Manifesto.


Ayo Ayoola-Amale



My YES for approval.





Yes I approve the manifesto. Congratulations.

Peace and all good,

Adam Greenwell,

New Zealand,



Dear Leo

I approve the manifesto.

All the Best

With love

Théa Marie Robert



Дорогие коллеги,

Манифест — это наша программа к действию. Идеи и принципы ГСГ четко отражены и не вызывают сомнение. Мое замечание к стилистике и форме самого документа. Манифест — это публичное заявление и должно быть понятно каждому. Он похож на обращение ученого к научному миру и больше похож на научный трактат и не цепляет за душу, а это должен быть призыв, боевой клич или набат, который разбудит каждого. Мне кажется манифест должен отражать интересы каждой сферы и как квинтэссенция каждого человека. Если мы в своем манифесте не можем кратко и понятным языком изложить свою точку зрения, значит мы еще не доработали нашу теорию. Наш путь тернист, но мы не отступим. Самое главное, что у нас есть фундамент - сферный подход и какое здание мы построим на этом фундаменте это зависит только от нас.

С уважением,

Александр Семашко




I approve!

Susana Roberts,




Mr. Leo Semashko

Sei que o assunto já foi decidido.

Mas reitero o meu apoio.

Delasnieve Daspet



Г-н Лев Семашко,

Я знаю, что вопрос уже решен.

Но я повторяю свою поддержку.

Деласниве Дашпет




I approve the manifesto.


Celia Altschuler,

Puerto Rico,



Thanks Dr Leo,

I have gone through the Spherons Manifesto.

Very comprehensive indeed and excellent for scientific and academic discourse.

I endorse it even though it late. I have thinking if we do an abridged version of the manifesto targeting ordinary people who may not understand the highly technical nature of the document? I guess this way; we could reach out also to the ordinary man with these great Spheron ideas. In any case, o­ne sentence I found in the manifesto very illuminating is this definition of Spheron “the Spherons sun belongs to everyone”. I found this statement very heart warming hence this idea of an abridged version to reach as many as possible with this manifesto.

Stephen Amoah,



I am agree with the Spherons Manifesto.

Surendra Pathak,





GHA 78th, final, farewell and starting project.

Approval up to June 8

Dear GHA members, friends,

I am glad to offer you the final, 78th GHA Project “Cyberspheronics Manifesto” for your discussion and approval by your YES or NO during 3 days, up to June 8 inclusively. It is in the attachment (12 pages) and o­n the website: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908The question is complex, so my farewell message is longexcuse me.

This is a special project - the GHA swan song. He summarizes and completes 15 years of our intellectual innovative searches, which were found in 10 unique/unprecedented, unparalleled books, 78 peace projects and hundreds of articles in 16 languages, which are found in almost all the world's largest libraries and universities in all continents and which received more than 15 million views o­n the GHA website “Peace from Harmony”. (The GHA results for 15 years are summarized in more detail and evaluated in comparison with the intellectual giants here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=927. Our books/projects are the GHA seeds of “a substantially new [non-violent, holistic, harmonious, cybernetic, asymmetric] manner of thinking” (Einstein) by the Gandhian spheres/spherons, which will certainly find favorable soil and give their fruitful shoots in the coming years and decades, becoming “the greatest shift in human thought of the last millennia” (Vernadsky).

The GHA made this shift in 15 years, which other academies cannot make in a century. As Gandhi wrote, “the world may ignore [the law of varnas/spherons] today but it will have to accept it in the time to come... Today, nations are living in ignorance and breach of that law”. Varnas/spherons reveal to us the eternal, immutable, genetic law of our being at Gandhi. It is still unknown to humanity; o­nly in the GHA did it receive sufficient theoretical and empirical/statistical evidence in all of its 10 books combined, especially in Gandhica, which focuses o­n 12 pages of the Cyberspheronics Manifesto, in the final, 78th GHA Project.

Thinking as a philosopher about the GHA 15-year history and the fate of its unprecedented intellectual heritage ahead of time, I realized that the traditional GHA has exhausted its intellectual potential, it’s inaccessible to the transition to practice, to the transformation of global governance and democracy, to business, to fundamental statistical research of spherons, which o­nly 12 people were able to do. As Schiller would say, "the Moor has done his work, the Moor may go." Everything has its time and everything comes to an end. Therefore, the 78th GHA project is its final and farewell project. In its logic, it remains o­nly to complete the GHA 10th book, “Gandhicracy”, the material for which is fully compiled (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=907) and it remains o­nly to assemble it in a small book of 150 pages and publish it at the year end. This will be done without fail. Who wanted to make statistics of spherons in it and write articles and reviews in it, he/she wrote. Waiting for no o­ne else is pointless. Here is the finish. The GHA 78th project will be the “Introduction” of the 10th book and the start of a new, young GHA, with new tasks for the practical implementation of its unique mental heritage.

As you know, "new wine requires new furs." The new, youth GHA will begin to be created in January 2021 based o­n the strategic pragmatics that are formulated in the second part of the “Cyberspheronics Manifesto”. Its practical implementation requires not o­nly higher thinking in spheres/spherons, but also organizing will and inspiring motivation, embodied in the first intellectual test of the new GHA - in the statistical scientific research of spherons (SSRS) of any level. This test is a criterion for higher, spheral intelligence, the corresponding mental abilities of the new century and at the same time an indicator of the pragmatic will of their implementation at the level of higher politics and business, including global. Without scientific, theoretical and empirical knowledge of spherons in the new century, there can be no true and practical peacemaking from harmony. SSRS is an individual discovery for o­neself of the true reality / substance of global peace from harmony at all levels. Therefore, SSRS is an intellectual test of each member in the new GHA.

Naturally, all those “old men - the last of the Mohicans” who conducted or will conduct SSRS before the end of the year and those young people who will pass this test by presenting their SSRS will be invited to the renewed GHA. The “Cyberspheronics Manifesto”, as you see, will become a bridge from the past to the future, from the old to the new GHA. It consists of a finish and a start at the same time, but in different dialectical relations and different realistic contextual meanings.

Therefore, it requires an ambivalent assessment/recall of each GHA member from the standpoint of its past/future, if he/she has not parted with it for any reason for a long time: age, health, intellectual reachless of the GHA achievements, apathy to everything, etc. In any case, all your feedbacks, as always, according to the GHA democratic tradition, will be saved for history in their publication, with thanks, o­n the page of our "Manifesto". We have done a lot, but more needs to be done with the new force of non-violence and intelligence of the new generation.

As for my personal fate, I will continue, until the end, my life’s mission of global peace, which excludes by the spherons the very possibility of war, which is “killed” by them that my parents was bequeathed to me, o­ne of whom died in the war. I will keep my mission under any conditions of Marxist suppression/persecution in the USSR/Russia, in which for 40 years there has not been a scientist, institute, Academy capable of listening, discussing, understanding and recognizing the fundamental nature of the spherons discovery, as well as Western racist, liberal Russophobia ignored it 10 years. I am full of optimism in the spherons triumph as the third way, in which history has already broken the Marxist anvil (USSR/communism) and is completing the destruction from within the liberal hammer (capitalism/militarism). All thinkers are well aware that capitalism is also destitute of the future (Wallerstein et al., 2013). Therefore, for me and for Gandhi/my spherons, as the third way - do not worry, please. They will live forever. This is my life-long experiment.

Best wishes to you all good health, love of life, summer holidays and global peace from the Gandhian spherons harmony,

Dr. Leo Semashko,

GHA Founder and Honorary President,

The ISA RC51 Sociocybernetics Honourary Lifetime Member,




Dear Professor Leo;

Greetings from Nepal!

Thank you for your innovative paper. A acquired a huge knowledge from this and you are the philosophical master o­n this Cyberspheronics. Please keep author introduction at the footnote of the page 1, rather just below the heading. You nicely portrait Love, Harmony, Peace and Non-violence. This paper has mentioned existence in some places, but if you could manage the words "non-existence", "empathy" and "dukha" are also the core instruments of Gandhian Philosophy. Security and dignity shall also be useful o­n this endeavor.

Many thanks o­nce again for your outstanding paper.

Sincerely yours,


Professor Bishnu Pathak, PhD

Former Commissioner

Commission of Investigation o­n Enforced Disappeared Persons, Nepal

Resume: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=910


Dear Professor Bishnu,

Greetings from Russia!

Thank you very much for your strong support of Cyberspheronics (CYBS) and your suggestions in it, o­n which we will think and discuss.

Your suggestions and support would be fundamentally stronger if you could do a statistical research of spherons (SRS) of Nepal for any year. It o­nly takes three hours, and you promised it. I could help you with it o­n Skype. Your SRS will open your wide path for the practical application / use of our Gandhica and CYBS in Nepal, and it will preserve our cooperation with you in the new GHA from next year, when it will work o­nly based o­n SRS.

SRS is an intellectual shift of the traditional, partial, egoistic "EGO thinking" into "substantial new" according to Einstein, holistic "ECO thinking" by the spheres/spherons. Could you try this intellectual shift for yourself?

I also call o­n all others who support CYBS to a similar intellectual shift, who would like to work with the GHA from the new year: Lucas from Austria, Ernesto from Israel, Lana and Roger from the USA, Michael from Australia and others. I do not think that it is not intellectually available to you. I am ready to help you o­n Skype as I can. The whole problem is finding three hours of time for it. Is it soluble for you?

With hope and best wishes,




Дорогой Лео Семашко!

Я думаю, вкладывать меч в ножны рановато. Реальные битвы только начинаются!

Мне недавно исполнился 81 год, но силы отнюдь не иссякли. Думаю, что немалую роль в этом сыграл препарат L-карнозин, который сегодня признан лучшим в мире геропротектором (информация во вложении).

Если Вы сочтете возможным, учтите при разработке Киберсфероники мои наработки

1.Трехчленный состав Ноосферы (Техносфера — Социосфера — Идеосфера), в котором Идеосфера — Дух Ноосферы — является самым важным

2.Числовую (аритмологическую) классификацию типов мировоззрений (базовых мифов) в Ноосфере (во вложенной книге — стр. 78).

Желаю Вам неувядающей бодрости Духа и крепости тела.

Вы делаете очень важное для всего Человечества дело!


Борис Режабек,



Дорогой Борис!

Спасибо за поддержку и добрые пожелания!

Что касается Ваших трех сфер ноосферы/человечества/общественного производства в целом (аутопоэзиса по Матуране), то в теоретической социологии, начиная с раннего Маркса, Броделя, Парсонса, Тоффлера, Ганди, Бурдье, включая мои книги за 30 лет, начиная с "Сферный подход" и кончая "Гандикой", и других твердо доказана их четырехсферная структура, от которой нет никаких оснований отступать. Почитайте об этом внимательно Гандику и напишите рецензию на нее с Вашими аргументами, без которых Ваше предложение совсем непонятно.

Если бы у Вас хватило Духа потратить 3 часа (с моей помощью по скайпу) на статисследование сферонов, например, Москвы за любой год, то Вы получили бы полное эмпирическое доказательство истинности четырехсферной структуры, поглощающей Ваши три сферы. Они, очевидно, у Вас из христианской традиции. Но эта песня вне науки, хотя не менее важна по другим основаниям, чем наука. Согласны?

Всего доброго,



Dear Leo,

I happily agree with our Cyberspheronics Manifesto!I also agree that with Lana that an attitude of resentment towards the USA does not further. The USA needs peace guidance right now! Do we have members with whom we can cooperate in the USA?


Lucas Pawlik,



Dear Lucas,

Thank you for your support of the Cyberspheronics Manifesto. You reply is published along with others o­n its page.

Unfortunately, American colleagues remain deeply silent for many reasons: pandemic, dangerous protests, torn partial thinking, etc. Indeed, the United States is most in need of “peace guidance right now!" But they are unable to accept it because of the torn "EGO-thinking", therefore they are doomed to violence, as always in their militaristic history. The bridge to peace through a holistic, “substantially new”, according to Einstein, non-violent “ECO-thinking” by spheres/spherons, at least for a start/example of the GHA members, could be their statistical research of spherons (SRS) of any state/city of the USA for any year. It takes o­nly 3 hours.

SRS is an intellectual shift from the traditional, partial, egoistic “EGO-thinking” into “substantial new”, holistic “ECO-thinking”. Could you and Lana try this intellectual shift for yourself, together, and with my help, if you want? Without such an example, no new "peace guidance right now!" in America is possible. Should someone show the first example? WHO? If everyone in America hid in their "EGO-thinking"? WHO will make a shift from it to peacemaking and non-violent "ECO-thinking" by spheres/spherons? Can we wait for this shift from Trump, as Lana comically advises? If we do not give it, we will have to wait for it o­nly from Trump. How will similar expectation end? It’s not difficult to predict.

Best regards,



Donald Trump.

Lana Yang,




Dear Leo,

I have already sent my article for Gandhicracy, about the real and truth Greek Democracy, which worked in the past producing amazing humanitarian and social achievements in all levels of culture and civilization.

You use the 'democracy' expression of West Europe and America, an ugly o­ne, which is completely different from the Greek Democracy.

So many countries admire and use the turn Democracy to show a quality face.

With love,

Takis D Ioannides,





Dear Leo,

I analyzed the Marxist ideology which inserted capitalism in a dialectical historical process. Lenin was a practical politician and Stalin a strong dictator who was in a tremendous society under internal and external war. I suspect that Marx could disagree with such evolution of the Russian Revolution. But this is o­nly an hypothesis. What is sure, is that Marx did not explain how socialism should be.

I think that, if we criticize the Soviet or Mao Societies, Marx must be excluded from that. In the same way, Jesus must be excluded from the Christian Inquisition.


Ernesto Kahan,



Dear Léo,

You traced a lasting furrow of tens of years, you knew to surround you by multiple researchers of the various continents and today, the proposals for a our network penetrate in all the continents.

Like, o­ne should not too much hope o­n the official Institutions to develop our work ,..

With our work, we propose to the people a new alternative, …

Nowadays, (and climatic disordered state and the state of the world based o­n the power struggle and the militarization) they are neither Communism, nor capitalism the future, but what we propose, and which Léo initiated. Thank you with him.



Social observant French writer


Dear Leo,


I include my article below, which you may be interested in.

Warm Wishes,


Michael Ellis,



Dear Leo,

I approve your concept.

My colleagues in the University want you to talk o­n Gandhica in a webinar.

Are you ready to do that? I will ask them to organize a talk through webinar.

Thank you.

Maitreyee Bardhan Roy,



Dear Leo:


Here is a new, improved copy of the Third Way.

It contains a new paragraph about Ossip Flechtheim, the founder of the critical Futurology.

The GHA Third Way is indeed needed today more than ever.

We shall have a worldwide Skype discourse via Boston College about the Third Way,

including GHA. You are remembered in the USA!!!

Best wishes,

Your Rudi from the House of Mir,

Prof. Rudolf Siebert,

Michigan University,







Andrey Smirnov

Any critical era urgently needs breakthrough strategic projects to address the global challenges it faces. For example, such a project for the 19th century was the famous “Manifesto of the Communist Party” written by K. Marx and F. Engels at the request of the communists of that time. In our opinion, along with innovative advantages, it also contained a number of methodological errors, which were most clearly recognized o­nly in the next century.

Firstly, this is the priority of the part over the whole, that is, the interests of the proletariat engaged in industrial production, over the interests of all other classes and social strata of society.

Secondly, the call for social revolutions, which, according to the authors, are the “locomotives of history”, that is, the call for violence as a universal means of resolving social contradictions.

Thirdly, the recognition of a number of classes as reactionary, such as the peasantry.

Fourth, the recognition of the need for the dictatorship of o­ne class over others, in order to suppress their resistance, and as a necessary means of transition to a future classless society.

Our transitional era, overloaded with violence of all types and colors, accompanied by a crisis of the civilizational foundations themselves, needs a fundamentally new ideology and new strategic projects.

In our opinion, such a breakthrough ideology and such a project found its most complete expression in the GHA "Global Governance MegaScience Manifesto." It outlines the main provisions of similar radically new direction in the transition from differential scientific subdisciplines to their holistic alternative, as “Cyberspheronics” (CYBS: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908). The fundamental novelty of this direction is that not o­ne sphere or area of human being is taken as an object of research but the universal societal wholeness of the noosphere, biosphere and cosmos.

The scientific ideas about this integrity allow us to build adequate models for its governance and strategic projects for its transformation, functioning and development. It should be noted that so far Russia has no such strategic projects, because modern socio-economic plans and national programs have nothing to do with the strategy, but relate to the tactical, short-term level of governance. For strategic design and strategic management, we need to be able to build objects of a different type, but in modern practice of public administration they still do not know how to do this, and no digitalization will help here.

It is also fundamentally important that CYBS is based not o­nly o­n a systemic, but o­n a metasystem (universumal) approach to research, forecasting and designing solutions to global problems facing humanity. The CYBS highest practical goal is the 21st century most important goal: the humanity survival and saving the bio- and noosphere from the global ecocide/genocide, overcoming the civilization crisis through the Third (outside of capitalism/communism) Way of harmonizing the joint existence of various civilizations based o­n their societally/genetically equal spheres/spherons.

In addition, a number of unique technologies are offered in Cyberspheronics, for example, technologies of spheral statistics unified for all countries, technologies for creating spheral Internet, technologies of a digital platform for new, non-violent democracy, technologies for solving global environmental and economic problems, technologies of the smartphones applications ensuring successful personal and professional growth of each person. As it is known from The Theory of Activity and Thinking* (Anisimov, 1991), o­nly technology provides the transition to the most effective options for human activity.

All this allows us to evaluate the “Global Governance MegaScience Manifesto” and its Cyberspheronics as a fundamentally innovative and promising response to the most pressing challenges of our time, as a kind of Gospel of a harmonious and intelligent life o­n Earth in our century.

*Anisimov O.S. New Governing Thinking: Essence and Ways of Formation. - M .: Economics, 1991 .-- 352 p. (In Russian)

Andrey Smirnov, Ph.D.,

Head of the "Novgorod Thought-Technical School O.S. Anisimov,



Two Manifestos: Ingenious Comparison.

Dear Andrey,

Thank you very much for your brilliant academic review at the highest professional level below. It was published in two languages ​​on the CYBS page (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908) along with all other responses from many countries there.

Especially valuable in your review, I would say, is a delicate, but principled, murderous criticism of the Marxist communist manifesto and an impeccable demonstration, o­n its outdated background, the indisputable historical advantages of our “CYBS Manifesto”. It is the genetically equal spherons Manifesto of their conscious/scientific, a substantially newThird Way to the era of peace, love, harmony and non-violence, to which the humanity science of self-knowledge has finally come after Gandhi.

The key sociological/methodological significance is emphasizing the dominance of a part over the whole, leading to the death of the whole (primarily the USSR and its camp), in the first manifesto and the priority of the holistic spheres/spherons over their parts in the second that ensures the humanity/whole survival and prosperity in global peace from them harmony.

Your fundamental review encourages some principled additions to our Manifesto, which will be presented in its final version.

We greatly appreciate and deeply gratitude your unique philosophical review.

Friendly, with best wishes for health and peace,




Ну что же... Как говорили в средневековой Франции, "Король умер... Да здравствует Король!!!" Новый Король. Однозначно "ДА" Вашему проекту и Вашему прощальному письму, Лев. Действительно, нам и нашим единомышленникам ровесникам осталось не так уж много времени оставаться ЗДЕСЬ. Поэтому нужны новые молодые силы, способные подхватить факел из пока ещё крепкой, но, всё-таки, не вечно молодой руки лидера. Это должны быть люди у которых впереди 20-30, а то и 50 лет активной жизни. Которые начнут воплощать в жизнь проекты ГСГ. Не исключено что некоторые из них окажутся у руля управления обществом. И это облегчит их усилия. А идеи, которые опередили своё время ждёт полный триумф!

Вот так, господа.

C уважением,

Александр Трубачёв,